Skip to content

· Private foundation

Irving a Hansen Memorial Fdn Xxxxx4004

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$415k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0181% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$878kScience & Tech$573kInternational$310kEducation$270kRecreation & Sports$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $325k
$50,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$7.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AVERA FOUNDATION$100,000
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERS$75,000
COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY$50,000
MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER$50,000
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$50,000
DOWNTOWN CLINIC$30,000
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH$25,000
NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION$25,000
CAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $413k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER: $70k → 6%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $52k → 6%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $52k → 6%MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER: $50k → 6%MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER: $50k → 6%MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER: $50k → 6%Lustgarten Foundation: $50k → 6%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $40k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.0M · 13 repeat orgs$65k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
2

Total granted

$3.0M
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+59%

Still filing today

62%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthScience & TechHuman ServicesInternationalEducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY
    8× · 2018–2025 · $325k · revenue +10%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $310k · revenue +89%
  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2018–2025 · $220k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +59%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
2
North Shore University Hospital

North shore university hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…

Health
3
South Shore University Hospital

South shore university hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…

Health
4
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
5
Cancer Research and Biostatistics

To help conquer cancer and other diseases through the application of biostatistical principles and innovative data management methods.

Health
6
Glen Cove Hospital

Glen cove hospital is part of northwell health, inc. ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality geriatric care; educating the current and future…

Health
7
Northwell Health Inc

Northwell health is the parent company of a fully integrated health system that is committed to promote clinical care, health education, conduct biomedical research, and caring for the community regardless of ability to pay.

Community Improvement
8
Lenox Hill Hospital

Lenox hill hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future generations…

Health
9
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
10
The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research

The feinstein institute for medical research ("the institute") is the research branch of northwell health ("northwell"). through its affiliation with northwell, the institute's mission is to bridge the gap between biomedical research and…

Health
11
Northwell Healthcare Inc

Northwell healthcare inc. coordinates policy making and strategic planning by providing advisory and administrative support services to affiliated health care organizations within northwell health; whose mission is to improve the health of…

Health
12
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; the most unlike its peers is Downtown Clinic. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AVERA FOUNDATION: $672,500 · OtherAVERA FOUNDATIONMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERS: $370,000 · OtherMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERSTEMPLE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH: $75,000 · OtherTEMPLE UNIVERSITY RESEARCHRESEARCH FOUNDATION OF THE CITY: $50,000 · OtherCOLUMBIA UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF: $50,000 · Other+1 more: $20,000 · OtherCancer Care Inc: $180,000 · HealthCancer Care IncCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $140,000 · HealthCANCER RESEARCH …DOWNTOWN CLINIC: $110,000 · HealthDOWNTOWN CLINICNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $25,000 · HealthNORTHWELL HEALTH…COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY: $325,000 · Science & TechCOLD SPRING HARB…The Salk Institute for Biological Studies: $122,500 · Science & TechThe Salk Institu…MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $413,000 · Human ServicesMARC LUSTGARTEN…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $310,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SA…JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $220,000 · EducationCAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$1,237,500Health$455,000Science & Tech$447,500Human Services$413,000International$310,000Education$220,000Recreation & Sports$10,000Public Safety & Disaster$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $413,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY: $325,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $310,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $220,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCancer Care Inc: $180,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $140,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe Salk Institute for Biological Studies: $122,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDOWNTOWN CLINIC: $110,000 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Cancer Care Inc ↗
  • Who funds CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds The Salk Institute for Biological Studies ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Irving a Hansen Memorial Fdn Xxxxx4004 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Irving a Hansen Memorial Fdn Xxxxx4004. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Irving a Hansen Memorial Fdn Xxxxx4004?

Find your warmest path to Irving a Hansen Memorial Fdn Xxxxx4004 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Irving a Hansen Memorial Fdn Xxxxx4004’s filings →

More from the funding graph