Skip to content

· Public charity

Iron Range Tourism Bureau

Tourism To promote travel and tourism in order to generate overnight lodging and economic impact for its service area

$112k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $98,126, the rows itemized in this filing. The $111,952 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $13,826 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $84k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$291k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Ranger Snowmobile Club$24,808
Pequaywan Area Trail Blazers$18,780
City of Chisholm$10,000
City of Eveleth$10,000
North Country Trail Association$10,000
Pathblazers Snowmobile Club$10,000
Iron Range Partnership for Sustainability$7,938
City of Buhl$6,600
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Pequaywan Area Trail Blazers: $19k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
03the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 7 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
2/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF CHISHOLM: $10,000 · OtherCITY OF CHISHOLMPathblazers Snowmobile Club Inc: $10,000 · OtherPathblazers Snowmobile Club IncCITY OF EVELETH: $10,000 · OtherCITY OF EVELETHCity of Buhl: $6,600 · OtherCity of BuhlRANGER SNOWMOBILE ATV CLUB INC: $24,808 · Recreation & SportsRANGER SNOWMOBILE ATV CLUB I…PEQUAYWAN AREA TRAIL BLAZERS INC: $18,780 · Human ServicesPEQUAYWAN AREA TRAIL …IRON RANGE PARTNERSHIP FOR SUSTAINABILITY: $17,938 · EnvironmentIRON RANGE PARTNERSH…
Other$36,600Recreation & Sports$24,808Human Services$18,780Environment$17,938

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRANGER SNOWMOBILE ATV CLUB INC: $24,808 over 1y, 14% of budgetPEQUAYWAN AREA TRAIL BLAZERS INC: $18,780 over 1y, 26% of budgetIRON RANGE PARTNERSHIP FOR SUSTAINABILITY: $17,938 over 1y, 14% of budgetPathblazers Snowmobile Club Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Iron Range Tourism Bureau funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Iron Range Tourism Bureau. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Iron Range Tourism Bureau?

    Find your warmest path to Iron Range Tourism Bureau through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Iron Range Tourism Bureau’s filings →

    More from the funding graph