Skip to content

· Public charity

Iowa Association of Regional Councils

The association has worked with member councils of governments to bring new state-wide programs to iowa including affordable housing options and 5-2-1-0 healthy choices count program to 15 different communities.

$640k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$91k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Public Benefit$3.1MHousing & Shelter$299kCommunity Improvement$66kEnvironment$66kYouth Development$28k
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k13 grants · $398k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $242k
$30,588
Median grant
3
States reached
$280k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REGION XII COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS$90,588
PATHFINDERS STRATEGIC PARTNERS$50,588
IOWA NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL OF$50,588
NORTHWEST IOWA PLANNING & DEVELOPM$50,588
NORTH IOWA AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNM$40,588
METROPOLITAN AREA PLANNING AGENCY$40,588
EAST CENTRAL IOWA COUNCIL OF GOVERN$40,588
EAST CENTRAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL ASSO$40,588
REGION 6 PLANNING COMISSION$30,588
SOUTHEAST IOWA REGIONAL PLANNING CO$30,588
BISTATE REGIONAL COMMISSION$30,588
SOUTHWEST IOWA PLANNING COUNCIL$30,588
SIOUXLAND INTERSTATE METROPOLITAN P$30,588
SOUTHERN IOWA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENT$20,588
UPPER EXPLORELAND REGIONAL PLANNING$20,588
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 76% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%METROPOLITAN AREA PLANNING AGENCY: $45k → 12%REGION XII COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS: $91k → 9%EAST CENTRAL IOWA COUNCIL OF GOVERN: $45k → 9%NORTHWEST IOWA PLANNING & DEVELOPM: $59k → 9%CAPTURE MARKETING SOLUTIONS: $28k → 10%EAST CENTRAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL ASSO: $50k → 11%REGION 6 PLANNING COMISSION: $45k → 11%UPPER EXPLORELAND REGIONAL PLANNING: $51k → 12%NORTH IOWA AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNM: $45k → 12%PATHFINDERS STRATEGIC PARTNERS: $51k → 13%SOUTHERN IOWA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENT: $61k → 13%SOUTHWEST IOWA PLANNING COUNCIL: $31k → 14%CHARITON VALLEY PLANNING & DEVELOP: $46k → 14%SOUTHEAST IOWA REGIONAL PLANNING CO: $53k → 15%AREA 15 REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSIO: $70k → 16%IOWA NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL OF: $51k → 17%METROPOLITAN AREA PLANNING AGENCY: $41k → 12%REGION XII COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS: $53k → 9%EAST CENTRAL IOWA COUNCIL OF GOVERN: $41k → 9%NORTHWEST IOWA PLANNING & DEVELOPM: $51k → 9%EAST CENTRAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL ASSO: $41k → 11%REGION 6 PLANNING COMISSION: $38k → 11%UPPER EXPLORELAND REGIONAL PLANNING: $30k → 12%NORTH IOWA AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNM: $43k → 12%PATHFINDERS STRATEGIC PARTNERS: $45k → 13%SOUTHERN IOWA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENT: $38k → 13%SOUTHWEST IOWA PLANNING COUNCIL: $30k → 14%CHARITON VALLEY PLANNING & DEVELOP: $30k → 14%SOUTHEAST IOWA REGIONAL PLANNING CO: $31k → 15%AREA 15 REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSIO: $38k → 16%IOWA NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL OF: $32k → 17%METROPOLITAN AREA PLANNING AGENCY: $26k → 12%REGION XII COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS: $50k → 9%EAST CENTRAL IOWA COUNCIL OF GOVERN: $30k → 9%NORTHWEST IOWA PLANNING & DEVELOPM: $25k → 9%EAST CENTRAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL ASSO: $25k → 11%REGION 6 PLANNING COMISSION: $31k → 11%UPPER EXPLORELAND REGIONAL PLANNING: $23k → 12%NORTH IOWA AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNM: $41k → 12%PATHFINDERS STRATEGIC PARTNERS: $26k → 13%SOUTHEAST IOWA REGIONAL PLANNING CO: $30k → 15%IOWA NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL OF: $25k → 17%METROPOLITAN AREA PLANNING AGENCY: $25k → 12%REGION XII COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS: $40k → 9%EAST CENTRAL IOWA COUNCIL OF GOVERN: $24k → 9%REGION 6 PLANNING COMISSION: $30k → 11%NORTH IOWA AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNM: $25k → 12%PATHFINDERS STRATEGIC PARTNERS: $25k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.5M · 16 repeat orgs$39k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
2

Total granted

$3.5M
$39k

Still filing today

6%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SI
    SOUTHERN IOWA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENT
    9× · 2017–2025 · $398k
  • RX
    REGION XII COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $299k · revenue +228%
  • SI
    SIOUXLAND INTERSTATE METROPOLITAN P
    9× · 2017–2025 · $226k

Funded once

  • CM
    CAPTURE MARKETING SOLUTIONS
    one grant, 2022 · $28k
  • SI
    SOUTHERN IOWA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
    one grant, 2017 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
1/1
Grantees still filing
1/1
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOUTHERN IOWA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENT: $398,306 · OtherSOUTHERN IOWA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTSIOUXLAND INTERSTATE METROPOLITAN P: $225,719 · OtherSIOUXLAND INTERSTATE METROPOLITAN PNORTHWEST IOWA PLANNING & DEVELOPM: $222,425 · OtherNORTHWEST IOWA PLANNING & DEVELOPMNorth IA Council of Governments: $218,104 · OtherNorth IA Council of GovernmentsAREA 15 REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSIO: $217,053 · OtherAREA 15 REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSIOMidas Council of Governments: $211,476 · OtherMidas Council of GovernmentsREGION SIX RESOURCE PARTNERS: $208,333 · OtherREGION SIX RESOURCE PARTNERSEAST CENTRAL IOWA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS: $204,343 · OtherEAST CENTRAL IOWA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTSEAST CENTRAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL ASSO: $202,309 · OtherEAST CENTRAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL ASSOMETROPOLITAN AREA PLANNING AGENCY: $201,160 · OtherMETROPOLITAN AREA PLANNING AGENCYUPPER EXPLORELAND REGIONAL PLANNING: $189,590 · OtherUPPER EXPLORELAND REGIONAL PLANNINGBI-STATE REGIONAL COMMISSION: $189,486 · OtherBI-STATE REGIONAL COMMISSIONIOWA NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL OF: $187,388 · OtherIOWA NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL OFCHARITON VALLEY PLANNING & DEVELOP: $184,760 · OtherCHARITON VALLEY PLANNING & DEVELOPSOUTHWEST IOWA PLANNING COUNCIL: $145,014 · Other+2 more: $39,176 · OtherREGION XII COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS INC: $298,728 · Housing & ShelterREGION XI…
Other$3,244,642Housing & Shelter$298,728

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetREGION XII COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS INC: $298,728 over 9y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds REGION XII COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Iowa Association of Regional Councils funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Iowa Association of Regional Councils. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Iowa Association of Regional Councils’ filings →

    More from the funding graph