Skip to content

· Community foundation

Iowa Area Development Group Community Foundation

The mission of the IOWA AREA DEVELOPMENT GROUP COMMUNITY FOUNDATION is to foster economic development and community betterment by providing public policy research and promotion; education and training; and community based and guided philanthropy.

$67k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$35k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

64% of Iowa Area Development Group Community Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Community Fdn Of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

2
’17
0
’18
1
’19
1
’20
1
’21
1
’22
1
’23
0
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$260kCommunity Improvement$73kEducation$25kEmployment$10kPublic Benefit$10k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $55,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $66,750 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $11,750 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER DES MOINES$35,000
HANCOCK COUNTY FOUNDATION (CO COMM FDN GTR DES MOINES)$10,000
KEOKUK COUNTY COMMUNITY ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 91% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Rural Development Council: $8k → 5%Rock Valley School Foundation: $10k → 8%Iowa Lakes Corridor Initiative: $10k → 9%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER DES MOINES: $35k → 10%CITY OF POSTVILLE: $10k → 12%KEOKUK COUNTY COMMUNITY ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%Upper Iowa University: $5k → 13%IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%IOWA RURAL DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL: $5k → 5%Community Foundation of Greater Des Moines: $35k → 10%KEOKUK COUNTY COMMUNITY ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%Iowa Rural Development Council: $5k → 5%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER DES MOINES: $35k → 10%Iowa Rural Development Council: $5k → 5%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER DES MOINES: $35k → 10%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER DES MOINES: $35k → 10%Community Foundation of Greater Des Moines: $35k → 10%Community Foundation of Greater Des Moines: $25k → 10%Community Foundation of Greater Des Moines: $25k → 10%HANCOCK COUNTY FOUNDATION (CO COMM FDN GTR DES MOINES): $10k → 10%Iowa Economic Development Authority Foundation: $10k → 10%IOWA AREA DEVELOPMENT GROUP: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 51% of Iowa Area Development Group Community Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Iowa Area Development Group Community Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
04Its field
05the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
2/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY FDN OF GREATER DES MOINES F/K/A GREATER DES MOINES COMMUNITY FDN: $260,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FDN OF GREATER DES MOINES F/K/A GREATER DES MOINES COMMUNITY FDNKEOKUK COUNTY COMMUNITY ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherKEOKUK COUNTY COMMUNITY…Iowa Economic Development Authority Foundation: $10,000 · OtherIowa Economic Developme…IOWA AREA DEVELOPMENT GROUP LC: $10,000 · OtherIOWA AREA DEVELOPMENT G…Individual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipi…HANCOCK COUNTY FOUNDATION (CO COMM FDN GTR DES MOINES): $10,000 · OtherHANCOCK COUNTY FOUNDATI…Rock Valley School Foundation: $10,000 · OtherRock Valley School Foun…Rural Development Council: $8,000 · OtherRural Development Counc…IOWA RURAL DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL: $15,000 · Community ImprovementIOWA LAKES CORRIDOR INITIATIVE: $10,000 · Community ImprovementIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationUPPER IOWA UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · Education
Philanthropy$260,000Other$78,000Community Improvement$25,000Education$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FDN OF GREATER DES MOINES F/K/A GREATER DES MOINES COMMUNITY FDN: $260,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetIOWA RURAL DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL: $15,000 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIOWA AREA DEVELOPMENT GROUP LC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetIOWA LAKES CORRIDOR INITIATIVE: $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetUPPER IOWA UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY FDN OF GREATER DES MOINES F/K/A GREATER DES MOINES COMMUNITY FDN ↗
  • Who funds IOWA RURAL DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds IOWA AREA DEVELOPMENT GROUP LC ↗
  • Who funds IOWA LAKES CORRIDOR INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds UPPER IOWA UNIVERSITY ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Iowa Area Development Group Community Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Iowa Area Development Group Community Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Iowa Area Development Group Community Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Iowa Area Development Group Community Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Iowa Area Development Group’s filings →

    More from the funding graph