Skip to content

· Public charity

International Union of Operating Engineers Local No 501

To provide representation to members in matters related to employment in accordance with the collective bargaining agreement and fair employment standards.

$67k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$50kHealth$46kEducation$39kPublic Benefit$35kEmployment$34kCommunity Improvement$31kArts & Culture$15kMembership Benefit$6k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $13,300, the rows itemized in this filing. The $66,956 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $53,656 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$7,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IUOE LOCAL 12 CHARITY GOLF COMMITTEE$7,000
ORANGE COUNTY LABOR FEDERATION$6,300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ORANGE COUNTY LABOR FEDERATION: $6k → 10%OPERATING ENGINEER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $7k → 10%NO ON PROP 6 - STOP THE ATTACK: $25k → 12%LA COUNTY FEDERATION OF LABOR BUILDING ASSOCIATION: $12k → 14%ST PATRICK'S DAY FOUNDATION NYC: $15k → 9%MARCH OF DIMES: $15k → 17%WE ARE MISSOURI: $10k → 10%LA COUNTY FEDERATION OF LABOR BUILDING ASSOCIATION: $8k → 14%MARCH OF DIMES: $15k → 17%LA COUNTY FEDERATION OF LABOR BUILDING ASSOCIATION: $8k → 14%MARCH OF DIMES: $10k → 17%la county FEDERATION OF LABOR BUILD: $6k → 14%MARCH OF DIMES: $6k → 17%LOS ANGELES TRADE-TECH COLLEGE - LATTC: $14k → 14%LOS ANGELES TRADE TECH COLLEGE: $10k → 14%LOS ANGELES TRADE TECH COLLEGE: $8k → 14%BOMA OF GREATER LOS ANGELES: $6k → 14%IUOE LOCAL 12 CHARITY GOLF COMMITTEE: $7k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$148k · 4 repeat orgs$108k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
7

Total granted

$148k
$95k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-41%
-17%

Still filing today

100%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MARCH OF DIMES INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $46k · revenue -41%
  • IL
    IUOE LOCAL 12 CHARITABLE GOLF COMMITTEE INC
    5× · 2018–2023 · $36k · revenue +14%
  • AL
    AFLCIO Los Angeles County Federation of Labor Building Assoc
    4× · 2019–2023 · $34k · revenue -64%

Funded once

  • NS
    NEVADA STATE DEMOCRATIC PARTY
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • CF
    Californians for Safe Reliable Infrastructure
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue -96%
  • SP
    ST PATRICKS DAY FOUNDATION NYC
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue -61%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Union of Operating Engineerslocal 68

Labor organization

—
2
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 18

Local 18 iuoe is a labor organization that has been instrumental in negotiating progressive contracts for the residential & heavy highway & building industry.

—
3
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 428

The organization is a labor union, organized under an International Charter, to provide and promote benefits for its members and represent them in labor negotiations and contract issues.

—
4
San Diego and Imperial Counties Labor Council Afl-Cio

The Labor Council offers an avenue for local unions to come together as one group.

—
5
United Assoc of Journeymen&Apprentices Lu #696

Labor union organization

—
6
Iuoe Local 420

To elevate the trade of operating engineers and improve the social, economic, and working conditions of its members.

Employment
7
Laborers' Int'l Union of North America District Council of Chicago

To promote unity of action in dealing with employers and to coordinate and consolidate the activities of its various affiliated local unions so they can work in a harmonious and united way.

—
8
The Laborers Pacific Southwest Regional Organizing Coalition

to organize workers in the laborers international union of north America, afl-cio pacific southwest region through a coordinated program to maintain and improve employment opportunities for affiliated local union members and to recruit new…

Employment
9
Los Angelesorange Counties Building and Construction Trades Council

To organize, increase collective bargaining support and publicize labor issues related to the construction industry within los angeles and orange counties.

—
10
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 4

The union improves working conditions and living standards of members through collective bargaining, education, training and employee benefits and establishes necessary procedures for the amicable adjustment of all disputes which may arise…

—
11
California Labor Federation Afl-Cio

The primary purposes of the organization are the study of economic and social conditions; the pursuit of policies aimed at effecting a more equal distribution of wealth; and the promotion of full employment.

—
12
International Union of Operating Engineers' Local 324

To anticipate for, and capitalize on the ever-changing economic, social, political and legal challenges facing our union; to provide an unmatched level of services to members through a dedicated, loyal team of professionals.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Californians for Safe Reliable Infrastructure. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
1/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AFLCIO Los Angeles County Federation of Labor Building Assoc: $34,200 · OtherAFLCIO Los Angeles County Federation of Labor Building A…LOS ANGELES TRADE TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $31,676 · OtherLOS ANGELES TRADE TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATIONNEVADA STATE DEMOCRATIC PARTY: $25,000 · OtherNEVADA STATE DEMOCRATIC PARTYWE ARE MISSOURI: $10,000 · OtherWE ARE MISSOURIMIGUEL ISLAS: $7,100 · OtherMIGUEL ISLASINTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 12: $7,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 12ORANGE COUNTY LABOR FEDERATION AFL-CIO: $6,300 · OtherBUILDING OWNERS & MANAGERS ASSOCIATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES: $5,750 · OtherMARCH OF DIMES INC: $45,850 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INCIUOE LOCAL 12 CHARITABLE GOLF COMMITTEE INC: $36,000 · PhilanthropyIUOE LOCAL 12 C…Californians for Safe Reliable Infrastructure: $25,000 · Community ImprovementCalifornian…ST PATRICKS DAY FOUNDATION NYC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureOPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NO 3 SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $7,000 · Education
Other$127,026Health$45,850Philanthropy$36,000Community Improvement$25,000Arts & Culture$15,000Education$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $45,850 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetIUOE LOCAL 12 CHARITABLE GOLF COMMITTEE INC: $36,000 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetAFLCIO Los Angeles County Federation of Labor Building Assoc: $34,200 over 4y, 16% of budgetLOS ANGELES TRADE TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $31,676 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetST PATRICKS DAY FOUNDATION NYC: $15,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetINTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 12: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NO 3 SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetORANGE COUNTY LABOR FEDERATION AFL-CIO: $6,300 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBUILDING OWNERS & MANAGERS ASSOCIATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES: $5,750 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization International Union of Operating Engineers Local No 501 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from International Union of Operating Engineers Local No 501. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on International Union of Operating Engineers Local No 501’s filings →

    More from the funding graph