· Public charity
International Union of Operating Engineers Local No 501
To provide representation to members in matters related to employment in accordance with the collective bargaining agreement and fair employment standards.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 50% of INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NO 501’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 2 grants below total $13,300 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $66,956 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $53,656 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| IUOE LOCAL 12 CHARITY GOLF COMMITTEE | $7,000 |
| ORANGE COUNTY LABOR FEDERATION | $6,300 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
4 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
MARCH OF DIMES INC4× · 2018–2021 · $46k · revenue -41%- ILIUOE LOCAL 12 CHARITABLE GOLF COMMITTEE INC5× · 2018–2023 · $36k · revenue +14%
- ALAFLCIO Los Angeles County Federation of Labor Building Assoc4× · 2019–2023 · $34k · revenue -64%
Funded once
- NSNEVADA STATE DEMOCRATIC PARTYone grant, 2018 · $25k
- CFCalifornians for Safe Reliable Infrastructureone grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue -96%
- SPST PATRICKS DAY FOUNDATION NYCone grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue -61%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Labor organization
Local 18 iuoe is a labor organization that has been instrumental in negotiating progressive contracts for the residential & heavy highway & building industry.
The organization is a labor union, organized under an International Charter, to provide and promote benefits for its members and represent them in labor negotiations and contract issues.
The Labor Council offers an avenue for local unions to come together as one group.
Labor union organization
To elevate the trade of operating engineers and improve the social, economic, and working conditions of its members.
To promote unity of action in dealing with employers and to coordinate and consolidate the activities of its various affiliated local unions so they can work in a harmonious and united way.
to organize workers in the laborers international union of north America, afl-cio pacific southwest region through a coordinated program to maintain and improve employment opportunities for affiliated local union members and to recruit new…
To organize, increase collective bargaining support and publicize labor issues related to the construction industry within los angeles and orange counties.
The union improves working conditions and living standards of members through collective bargaining, education, training and employee benefits and establishes necessary procedures for the amicable adjustment of all disputes which may arise…
The primary purposes of the organization are the study of economic and social conditions; the pursuit of policies aimed at effecting a more equal distribution of wealth; and the promotion of full employment.
To anticipate for, and capitalize on the ever-changing economic, social, political and legal challenges facing our union; to provide an unmatched level of services to members through a dedicated, loyal team of professionals.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc and the most unlike its peers is Californians for Safe Reliable Infrastructure. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
- Who funds IUOE LOCAL 12 CHARITABLE GOLF COMMITTEE INC ↗
- Who funds AFLCIO Los Angeles County Federation of Labor Building Assoc ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES TRADE TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Californians for Safe Reliable Infrastructure ↗
- Who funds ST PATRICKS DAY FOUNDATION NYC ↗
- Who funds OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NO 3 SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 12 ↗
- Who funds ORANGE COUNTY LABOR FEDERATION AFL-CIO ↗
- Who funds BUILDING OWNERS & MANAGERS ASSOCIATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization International Union of Operating Engineers Local No 501 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.