Skip to content

· Public charity

International Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers Local Union No 1

Collective bargaining representation on behalf of members.

$2.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$531k
Largest
01What it funds
0180% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Employment$6.7MArts & Culture$2.5MHuman Services$772kReligion$728kScience & Tech$466kMembership Benefit$402kYouth Development$278kHealth$151kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 17 grants below total $2,759,652, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,864,102 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $104,450 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $142k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $541k
  • $250k+5 grants · $2.1M
$63,058
Median grant
3
States reached
$51M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$530,925
Rad & DAprile Inc$525,795
Berardi Stone Setting Inc$398,223
Individual grant recipient$318,698
SAL-VIO Const Corp$295,272
Individual grant recipient$248,044
The Grenadier Corp$95,226
Individual grant recipient$84,484
James McGowan & Son Masonry$63,058
Miller Druck Specialty Contra$50,484
Individual grant recipient$42,172
Vespa Stone LLC$33,643
Atlantic Exterior Wall System$22,911
Stone Truss Systems Inc$17,654
Petrone$15,563
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 64% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Rad & DAprile Inc: $526k → 6%MasterCraft Masonery Inc: $271k → 6%Sessa Plastering Corporation: $120k → 7%Darante Construction Ltd: $66k → 9%Hull Const & Restoration: $179k → 13%Northeastern Masonry & Restor: $332k → 14%James McGowan & Son Masonry: $64k → 16%Broad Construction: $165k → 20%SAL-VIO Const Corp: $1.3M → 28%Acranom Masonry: $248k → 7%Back Brook Masonry LLC: $900k → 5%Rad & DAprile Inc: $184k → 6%Sessa Plastering Corporation: $45k → 7%Berardi Stone Setting Inc: $398k → 9%Hull Const & Restoration: $57k → 13%Northeastern Masonry & Restor: $319k → 14%James McGowan & Son Masonry: $63k → 16%Broad Construction: $119k → 20%SAL-VIO Const Corp: $1.3M → 28%Back Brook Masonry LLC: $276k → 5%Rad & DAprile Inc: $94k → 6%Giaquinto Masonry: $531k → 7%MasterCraft Masonery Inc: $89k → 9%James McGowan & Son Masonry: $40k → 16%SAL-VIO Const Corp: $1.1M → 28%Back Brook Masonry LLC: $247k → 5%Rad & DAprile Inc: $89k → 6%Giaquinto Masonry: $400k → 7%A Ottavino Corporation: $205k → 13%Del Savio Masonry Corporation: $379k → 28%Giaquinto Masonry: $343k → 7%Commodore Const Corp: $482k → 9%Del Savio Masonry Corporation: $337k → 28%Giaquinto Masonry: $209k → 7%Commodore Const Corp: $329k → 9%SAL-VIO Const Corp: $295k → 28%Silnap Corp: $49k → 7%Commodore Const Corp: $137k → 9%The Grenadier Corp: $95k → 28%Giaquinto Masonry: $100k → 7%Miller Druck Specialty Contra: $78k → 17%Miller Druck Specialty Contra: $50k → 17%Elite Wall Systems: $47k → 7%Broad Construction: $168k → 17%Vespa Stone LLC: $205k → 17%Nico Construction Group: $84k → 7%Pirraglia Sons Inc: $56k → 7%Eurotech Construction: $42k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13M · 24 repeat orgs$865k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
13

Total granted

$13M
$439k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-6%
+13%

Still filing today

13%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $426k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Membership BenefitPublic BenefitEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SAL-VIO Const Corp
    4× · 2021–2024 · $4.0M
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.6M
  • BB
    Back Brook Masonry LLC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $1.4M

Funded once

  • AO
    A Ottavino Corporation
    one grant, 2019 · $205k
  • DC
    Darante Construction Ltd
    one grant, 2023 · $66k
  • PS
    Pirraglia Sons Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $56k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
2/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAL-VIO Const Corp: $4,001,669 · OtherSAL-VIO Const CorpIndividual grant recipient: $1,583,568 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBack Brook Masonry LLC: $1,422,906 · OtherBack Brook Masonry LLCCommodore Const Corp: $947,311 · OtherCommodore Const CorpRad & DAprile Inc: $892,525 · OtherRad & DAprile IncDel Savio Masonry Corporation: $715,616 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $650,449 · Other+32 more: $3,513,174 · Other+32 moreNY HELMETS TO HARDHATS INC: $22,520 · Public BenefitWOMEN BUILDERS COUNCIL INC: $7,500 · Membership BenefitEmploying Bricklayers Association: $5,850 · Employment
Other$13,727,218Public Benefit$22,520Membership Benefit$7,500Employment$5,850

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPLASTERING & SPRAY FIREPROOFING CONTRACTORS OF GREATER NEW YORK INC: $164,688 over 2y, 35% of budgetBUILDING CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION INC: $28,100 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNY HELMETS TO HARDHATS INC: $22,520 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetWOMEN BUILDERS COUNCIL INC: $7,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetEmploying Bricklayers Association: $5,850 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetNEW YORK STATE POLICE INVESTIGATORS ASSOCIATION: $5,250 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PLASTERING & SPRAY FIREPROOFING CONTRACTORS OF GREATER NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds BUILDING CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NY HELMETS TO HARDHATS INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN BUILDERS COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds Employing Bricklayers Association ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization International Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers Local Union No 1 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from International Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers Local Union No 1. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to International Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers Local Union No 1?

    Find your warmest path to International Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers Local Union No 1 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on International Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers Local Union No 1’s filings →

    More from the funding graph