Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

International Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers Local Union No 1

Collective bargaining representation on behalf of members.

$2.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$531k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 100% of INTERNATIONAL UNION OF BRICKLAYERS & ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS LOCAL UNION NO 1’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 17 grants below total $2,759,652 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,864,102 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $104,450 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $142k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $541k
  • $250k+5 grants · $2.1M
$63,058
Median grant
3
States reached
$51M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$530,925
Rad & DAprile Inc$525,795
Berardi Stone Setting Inc$398,223
Individual grant recipient$318,698
SAL-VIO Const Corp$295,272
Individual grant recipient$248,044
The Grenadier Corp$95,226
Individual grant recipient$84,484
James McGowan & Son Masonry$63,058
Miller Druck Specialty Contra$50,484
Individual grant recipient$42,172
Vespa Stone LLC$33,643
Atlantic Exterior Wall System$22,911
Stone Truss Systems Inc$17,654
Petrone$15,563
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 64% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Rad & DAprile Inc: $526k → 6%MasterCraft Masonery Inc: $271k → 6%Sessa Plastering Corporation: $120k → 7%Darante Construction Ltd: $66k → 9%Hull Const & Restoration: $179k → 13%Northeastern Masonry & Restor: $332k → 14%James McGowan & Son Masonry: $64k → 16%Broad Construction: $165k → 20%SAL-VIO Const Corp: $1.3M → 28%Acranom Masonry: $248k → 7%Back Brook Masonry LLC: $900k → 5%Rad & DAprile Inc: $184k → 6%Sessa Plastering Corporation: $45k → 7%Berardi Stone Setting Inc: $398k → 9%Hull Const & Restoration: $57k → 13%Northeastern Masonry & Restor: $319k → 14%James McGowan & Son Masonry: $63k → 16%Broad Construction: $119k → 20%SAL-VIO Const Corp: $1.3M → 28%Back Brook Masonry LLC: $276k → 5%Rad & DAprile Inc: $94k → 6%Giaquinto Masonry: $531k → 7%MasterCraft Masonery Inc: $89k → 9%James McGowan & Son Masonry: $40k → 16%SAL-VIO Const Corp: $1.1M → 28%Back Brook Masonry LLC: $247k → 5%Rad & DAprile Inc: $89k → 6%Giaquinto Masonry: $400k → 7%A Ottavino Corporation: $205k → 13%Del Savio Masonry Corporation: $379k → 28%Giaquinto Masonry: $343k → 7%Commodore Const Corp: $482k → 9%Del Savio Masonry Corporation: $337k → 28%Giaquinto Masonry: $209k → 7%Commodore Const Corp: $329k → 9%SAL-VIO Const Corp: $295k → 28%Silnap Corp: $49k → 7%Commodore Const Corp: $137k → 9%The Grenadier Corp: $95k → 28%Giaquinto Masonry: $100k → 7%Miller Druck Specialty Contra: $78k → 17%Miller Druck Specialty Contra: $50k → 17%Elite Wall Systems: $47k → 7%Broad Construction: $168k → 17%Vespa Stone LLC: $205k → 17%Nico Construction Group: $84k → 7%Pirraglia Sons Inc: $56k → 7%Eurotech Construction: $42k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$13M · 24 repeat orgs$865k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
13

Total granted

$13M
$439k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-3%
+13%

Still filing today

13%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $426k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Membership BenefitPublic BenefitEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SAL-VIO Const Corp
    4× · 2021–2024 · $4.0M
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.6M
  • BB
    Back Brook Masonry LLC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $1.4M

Funded once

  • AO
    A Ottavino Corporation
    one grant, 2019 · $205k
  • DC
    Darante Construction Ltd
    one grant, 2023 · $66k
  • PS
    Pirraglia Sons Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $56k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
2/6
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SAL-VIO Const Corp — $4,001,669 · OtherSAL-VIO Const CorpIndividual grant recipient — $1,583,568 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBack Brook Masonry LLC — $1,422,906 · OtherBack Brook Masonry LLCCommodore Const Corp — $947,311 · OtherCommodore Const CorpRad & DAprile Inc — $892,525 · OtherRad & DAprile IncDel Savio Masonry Corporation — $715,616 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $650,449 · Other+32 more — $3,513,174 · Other+32 moreNY HELMETS TO HARDHATS INC — $22,520 · Public BenefitWOMEN BUILDERS COUNCIL INC — $7,500 · Membership BenefitEmploying Bricklayers Association — $5,850 · Employment
Other$13,727,218Public Benefit$22,520Membership Benefit$7,500Employment$5,850

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPLASTERING & SPRAY FIREPROOFING CONTRACTORS OF GREATER NEW YORK INC — $164,688 over 2y, 35% of budgetBUILDING CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION INC — $28,100 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNY HELMETS TO HARDHATS INC — $22,520 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetWOMEN BUILDERS COUNCIL INC — $7,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetEmploying Bricklayers Association — $5,850 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetNEW YORK STATE POLICE INVESTIGATORS ASSOCIATION — $5,250 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PLASTERING & SPRAY FIREPROOFING CONTRACTORS OF GREATER NEW YORK INC
  • Who funds BUILDING CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds NY HELMETS TO HARDHATS INC
  • Who funds WOMEN BUILDERS COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds Employing Bricklayers Association

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization International Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers Local Union No 1 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to International Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers Local Union No 1?

    Find your warmest path to International Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers Local Union No 1 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph