Skip to content

· Private foundation

International Theos Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$9k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

International$18kEducation$4kEnvironment$4kReligion$2kCivil Rights$2kHousing & Shelter$2kHuman Services$1kFood & Nutrition$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,375
Median grant
5
States reached
$17k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
World Hope Int'l - Support for Hait$4,000
Doctor's Without Borders$2,000
Moravian University$1,375
The Carter Center$500
Carpenter's Shelter$500
Wounded Warriors Project$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SAM RELIEF INC: $1k → 8%Sam Relief Inc: $300 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$28k · 8 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
4

Total granted

$28k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+26%

Still filing today

75%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WH
    World Hope International Inc
    2× · 2020–2021 · $7k · revenue +32%
  • MU
    MORAVIAN UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2021–2024 · $4k · revenue +34%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • CU
    CENTRAL UNION MISSIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +26%
  • SW
    SPEAKING WITH A PURPOSE
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • CH
    CHRIST HOUSE CATHOLIC CHARITIES
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Charity Global Inc

Charity: water is a non-profit organization bringing clean and safe water to people around the world. continued on schedule o.

Human Services
2
Corus International Inc

TO MANAGE AN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, HEALTH, AND RELIEF FOCUSED FAMILY OF ORGANIZATIONS HELPING PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES LIFT THEMSELVES OUT OF POVERTY, SUPPORT WELL-BEING OF INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES, AND PROVIDE…

Human Services
3
Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International
4
United Way Worldwide

To improve lives by mobilizing caring power of communities around the world to advance common good.

Philanthropy
5
World Vision Inc

World vision, inc. is a christian humanitarian organization dedicated to working with children, families, and their communities worldwide to reach their full potential by tackling the causes of poverty and injustice. (continued on schedule…

International
6
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
7
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
8
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
9
International Crisis Group

Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…

International
10
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
11
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
12
Catholic Medical Mission Board Inc

Catholic medical mission board (cmmb) is an international, faith-based nonprofit that believes in healthier lives worldwide. we work in partnerships globally to deliver locally sustainable, quality health solutions, (continued on schedule…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sam Relief Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

World Hope Int'l - Support for Hait: $10,000 · OtherWorld Hope Int'l - Support for HaitMORAVIAN UNIVERSITY: $4,216 · OtherMORAVIAN UNIVERSITYSPEAKING WITH A PURPOSE: $1,650 · OtherSPEAKING WITH A PURPOSECHRIST HOUSE CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $1,000 · OtherCHRIST HOUSE CATHOLIC CHARITIES+2 more: $900 · OtherWorld Hope International Inc: $7,000 · InternationalWorld Hope International IncMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $2,300 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $1,000 · InternationalTHE CARTER CENTER INCCENTRAL UNION MISSION: $2,000 · Housing & ShelterCENTRAL UNI…CARPENTER'S SHELTER INC: $1,500 · Housing & ShelterCARPENTER'S…SAM RELIEF INCORPORATED: $1,300 · Human ServicesVIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA INC: $500 · Public Benefit
Other$17,766International$10,300Housing & Shelter$3,500Human Services$1,300Public Benefit$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWorld Hope International Inc: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMORAVIAN UNIVERSITY: $4,216 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $2,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL UNION MISSION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARPENTER'S SHELTER INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAM RELIEF INCORPORATED: $1,300 over 2y, 19% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization International Theos Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from International Theos Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on International Theos’ filings →

    More from the funding graph