Skip to content
International Refugee Assistance Project Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

International Refugee Assistance Project Inc

Irap is a global legal aid and advocacy organization working to create a world where refugees and all people seeking safety are empowered to claim their right to freedom of movement and a path to lasting refuge.

$3.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$220kCrime & Legal$57k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $6,750, the rows itemized in this filing. The $3,396,607 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $3,389,857 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$6,750
Median grant
1
States reached
$70M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LAS AMERICAS IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY CENTER$6,750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $220k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ASYLUM SEEKER ADVOCACY PROJECT: $110k → 17%ASYLUM SEEKER ADVOCACY PROJECT: $110k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $3.3M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 7 regions, $3.3M to organizations and $30k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$2.7M · 81% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: ASSISTANCE AND AID FOR REFUGEES

Sub-Saharan Africa$230k · 7% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: ASSISTANCE AND AID FOR REFUGEES · WORK TOGETHER TO CO-DESIGN A PROJECT THAT WILL STRENGTHEN SERVICES FOR DISPLACED PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES IN KENYA.

North America (Canada and Mexico)$160k · 5% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: PARTNER TO ADVANCE FAMILY REUNIFICATION AND REFUGEE RESETTLEMENT EFFORTS IN LATIN AMERICA AND CARRIBEAN THROUGH PROVIDING INFORMATION, TRAINING AND ADVOCACY. · PROVIDE LEGAL SERVICES, COMMUNITY EDUCATION AND REPRESENTATION TO INDIVIDUALS IN NORTHERN MEXICO SEEKING ADMISSION, PAROLE OR ASYLUM/REFUGEE PROTECTIONS IN THE U.S. · PROVIDE LEGAL INFORMATION TO MIGRANTS IN THE AMERICAS ABOUT ACCESSING SAFE AND LEGAL PATHWAYS IN THE UNITED STATES.

Central America and the Caribbean$85k · 3% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: PARTNER TO ADVANCE FAMILY REUNIFICATION AND REFUGEE RESETTLEMENT EFFORTS IN LATIN AMERICA AND CARRIBEAN THROUGH PROVIDING INFORMATION, TRAINING AND ADVOCACY.

Middle East and North Africa$75k · 2% · 1 grant · 297 people

Stated purpose: CONDUCTING TRAINING TO PARTNER ORGANIZATIONS ON AVAILABLE PATHWAYS TO RESETTLEMENT/RLOCATION, ADVOCACY AND COLLABORATION THROUGH THE COMPLEMENTARY PATHWAYS WORKING GROUP, COLLABORATION ON SECURE DATA MANAGEMENT PLATFORMS, AND PROVIDING PSYCHOSOCIAL SUPPORT SERVICES TO INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE RESETTLING. · DIRECT CASH ASSISTANCE

South America$60k · 2% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: PARTNER TO ADVANCE FAMILY REUNIFICATION AND REFUGEE RESETTLEMENT EFFORTS IN LATIN AMERICA AND CARRIBEAN THROUGH PROVIDING INFORMATION, TRAINING AND ADVOCACY. · ASSISTANCE AND AID FOR REFUGEES

East Asia and the Pacific$30k · 1% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: CREATE ACCESSIBLE ONLINE RESOURCES THAT EXPLAIN COMPLEX RESETTLEMENT PROCESSES IN EASY TERMS FOR REFUGEES AND RESPOND TO ENQUIRIES WITH INFORMATION AS REQUIRED.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
2/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ASYLUM SEEKER ADVOCACY PROJECT INC: $220,000 · Human ServicesASYLUM SEEKER ADVOCACY PROJECT INCCATHOLIC LEGAL IMMIGRATION NETWORK INC: $50,000 · Civil RightsCATHOLIC LEGAL IMMIG…LAS AMERICAS IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY CENTER: $6,750 · Other
Human Services$220,000Civil Rights$50,000Other$6,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetASYLUM SEEKER ADVOCACY PROJECT INC: $220,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetCATHOLIC LEGAL IMMIGRATION NETWORK INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLAS AMERICAS IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY CENTER: $6,750 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization International Refugee Assistance Project Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from International Refugee Assistance Project Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 3 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on International Refugee Assistance Project’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home