Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

International Refugee Assistance Project Inc

Irap is a global legal aid and advocacy organization working to create a world where refugees and all people seeking safety are empowered to claim their right to freedom of movement and a path to lasting refuge.

$3.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Human Services$220kCrime & Legal$57k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $6,750 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,396,607 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $3,389,857 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$6,750
Median grant
1
States reached
$70M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LAS AMERICAS IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY CENTER$6,750
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $220k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ASYLUM SEEKER ADVOCACY PROJECT: $110k → 17%ASYLUM SEEKER ADVOCACY PROJECT: $110k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Grants abroad, by region — $3.3M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 7 regions, $3.3M to organizations and $30k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$2.7M · 81% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: ASSISTANCE AND AID FOR REFUGEES

Sub-Saharan Africa$230k · 7% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: ASSISTANCE AND AID FOR REFUGEES · WORK TOGETHER TO CO-DESIGN A PROJECT THAT WILL STRENGTHEN SERVICES FOR DISPLACED PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES IN KENYA.

North America (Canada and Mexico)$160k · 5% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: PARTNER TO ADVANCE FAMILY REUNIFICATION AND REFUGEE RESETTLEMENT EFFORTS IN LATIN AMERICA AND CARRIBEAN THROUGH PROVIDING INFORMATION, TRAINING AND ADVOCACY. · PROVIDE LEGAL SERVICES, COMMUNITY EDUCATION AND REPRESENTATION TO INDIVIDUALS IN NORTHERN MEXICO SEEKING ADMISSION, PAROLE OR ASYLUM/REFUGEE PROTECTIONS IN THE U.S. · PROVIDE LEGAL INFORMATION TO MIGRANTS IN THE AMERICAS ABOUT ACCESSING SAFE AND LEGAL PATHWAYS IN THE UNITED STATES.

Central America and the Caribbean$85k · 3% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: PARTNER TO ADVANCE FAMILY REUNIFICATION AND REFUGEE RESETTLEMENT EFFORTS IN LATIN AMERICA AND CARRIBEAN THROUGH PROVIDING INFORMATION, TRAINING AND ADVOCACY.

Middle East and North Africa$75k · 2% · 1 grant · 297 people

Stated purpose: CONDUCTING TRAINING TO PARTNER ORGANIZATIONS ON AVAILABLE PATHWAYS TO RESETTLEMENT/RLOCATION, ADVOCACY AND COLLABORATION THROUGH THE COMPLEMENTARY PATHWAYS WORKING GROUP, COLLABORATION ON SECURE DATA MANAGEMENT PLATFORMS, AND PROVIDING PSYCHOSOCIAL SUPPORT SERVICES TO INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE RESETTLING. · DIRECT CASH ASSISTANCE

South America$60k · 2% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: PARTNER TO ADVANCE FAMILY REUNIFICATION AND REFUGEE RESETTLEMENT EFFORTS IN LATIN AMERICA AND CARRIBEAN THROUGH PROVIDING INFORMATION, TRAINING AND ADVOCACY. · ASSISTANCE AND AID FOR REFUGEES

East Asia and the Pacific$30k · 1% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: CREATE ACCESSIBLE ONLINE RESOURCES THAT EXPLAIN COMPLEX RESETTLEMENT PROCESSES IN EASY TERMS FOR REFUGEES AND RESPOND TO ENQUIRIES WITH INFORMATION AS REQUIRED.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
2/3
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ASYLUM SEEKER ADVOCACY PROJECT INC — $220,000 · Human ServicesASYLUM SEEKER ADVOCACY PROJECT INCCATHOLIC LEGAL IMMIGRATION NETWORK INC — $50,000 · Civil RightsCATHOLIC LEGAL IMMIG…LAS AMERICAS IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY CENTER — $6,750 · Other
Human Services$220,000Civil Rights$50,000Other$6,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetASYLUM SEEKER ADVOCACY PROJECT INC — $220,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetCATHOLIC LEGAL IMMIGRATION NETWORK INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLAS AMERICAS IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY CENTER — $6,750 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization International Refugee Assistance Project Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 3 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph