Skip to content

· Public charity

International Interior Design Assn

Iida represents designers whose mission is the advancement of the commercial design profession through advocacy, education, networking and public relations.

$111k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Membership Benefit$440kCommunity Improvement$408kHealth$45kEducation$32kPublic Benefit$8k
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $93,883, the rows itemized in this filing. The $111,382 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $17,499 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $78k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $16k
$7,500
Median grant
10
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COUNCIL FOR INT DESIGN ACCREDITATION$16,000
IIDA NORTHERN CALIFORNIA CHAPTER$7,500
IIDA CAROLINAS CHAPTER$7,500
IIDA SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CHAPTER$7,500
IIDA NORTH FLORIDA CHAPTER$7,500
IIDA MICHIGAN CHAPTER$7,500
IIDA MID-AMERICA CHAPTER$7,397
IIDA OREGON CHAPTER$7,020
IIDA ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHAPTER-V$7,000
IIDA NEW YORK CHAPTER-V$6,716
IIDA MID-ATLANTIC CHAPTER$6,250
IIDA OHIO KENTUCKY CHAPTER$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 85% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%IIDA SOUTHWEST CHAPTER: $15k → 11%IIDA GREAT PLAINS CHAPTER: $12k → 12%IIDA NEW ENGLAND CHAPTER: $12k → 11%IIDA PANJDE CHAPTER: $18k → 11%IIDA NORTHERN CALIFORNIA CHAPTER: $8k → 10%IIDA NEW YORK CHAPTER-V: $23k → 17%IIDA TEXAS- OKLAHOMA CHAPTER: $7k → 14%REPUBLICATION STATE LEADERSHIP: $8k → 14%IIDA SOUTH FLORIDA: $8k → 15%COUNCIL FOR INT DESIGN ACCREDITATION: $16k → 11%IIDA MID-AMERICA CHAPTER: $7k → 16%IIDA MID-AMERICA CHAPTER: $7k → 15%IIDA WISCONSIN CHAPTER: $16k → 10%IIDA CAROLINAS CHAPTER: $8k → 10%IIDA INTERMOUNTAIN CHAPTER: $24k → 8%IIDA ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHAPTER: $38k → 12%IIDA OHIO KENTUCKY CHAPTER: $6k → 15%IIDA OHIOKENTUCKY CHAPTER: $34k → 16%IIDA OHIOKENTUCKY CHAPTER: $41k → 17%IIDA ILLINOIS CHAPTER: $9k → 7%IIDA GREAT PLAINS CHAPTER-V: $8k → 14%IIDA VIRGINIAWEST VIRGINIA CHAPTER: $8k → 22%IIDA SOUTHWEST CHAPTER: $5k → 11%IIDA MID-ATLANTIC CHAPTER: $8k → 11%IIDA NORTHERN CALIFORNIA CHAPTER: $7k → 10%IIDA NEW YORK CHAPTER-V: $7k → 17%COUNCIL FOR INT DESIGN ACCREDITATION: $16k → 11%IIDA WISCONSIN CHAPTER: $14k → 10%IIDA ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHAPTER: $18k → 12%IIDA OHIOKENTUCKY CHAPTER: $41k → 17%IIDA GREAT PLAINS CHAPTER: $8k → 14%IIDA NEW ENGLAND CHAPTER: $24k → 11%IIDA NEW YORK CHAPTER-V: $6k → 17%IIDA WISCONSIN CHAPTER: $12k → 10%IIDA ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHAPTER-V: $7k → 12%IIDA OHIOKENTUCKY CHAPTER: $23k → 17%IIDA CENTRAL FLORIDA CHAPTER: $7k → 14%IIDA NEW ENGLAND CHAPTER: $8k → 11%IIDA WISCONSIN CHAPTER: $8k → 10%IIDA ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHAPTER-V: $7k → 12%IIDA GATEWAY CHAPTER: $7k → 14%IIDA NEW ENGLAND CHAPTER: $20k → 11%IIDA INDIANA CHAPTER: $7k → 11%IIDA NORTHLAND CHAPTER: $6k → 11%IIDA MID-ATLANTIC CHAPTER: $6k → 11%IIDA NEW ENGLAND CHAPTER: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
OR
OH
PA
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
VA
AZ
KS
NC
DC
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$826k · 17 repeat orgs$107k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
9

Total granted

$826k
$77k

Still filing today

6%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IO
    IIDA OHIOKENTUCKY CHAPTER
    5× · 2017–2024 · $143k
  • IT
    IIDA TEXASOKLAHOMA CHAPTER
    6× · 2017–2022 · $106k
  • IW
    IIDA WISCONSIN CHAPTER
    5× · 2017–2022 · $70k

Funded once

  • IP
    IIDA PANJDE CHAPTER
    one grant, 2017 · $18k
  • II
    IIDA ILLINOIS CHAPTER
    one grant, 2018 · $9k
  • IV
    IIDA VIRGINIAWEST VIRGINIA CHAPTER
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
1/1
Grantees still filing
1/1
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IIDA OHIOKENTUCKY CHAPTER: $143,000 · OtherIIDA OHIOKENTUCKY CHAPTERIIDA TEXASOKLAHOMA CHAPTER: $106,000 · OtherIIDA TEXASOKLAHOMA CHAPTERIIDA WISCONSIN CHAPTER: $69,964 · OtherIIDA WISCONSIN CHAPTERIIDA ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHAPTER: $69,500 · OtherIIDA ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHAPTERIIDA NEW ENGLAND CHAPTER: $69,045 · OtherIIDA NEW ENGLAND CHAPTERIIDA SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CHAPTER: $58,355 · OtherIIDA SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CHAPTERIIDA CENTRAL FLORIDA CHAPTER: $49,500 · OtherIIDA CENTRAL FLORIDA CHAPTERIIDA INTERMOUNTAIN CHAPTER-V: $47,337 · OtherIIDA DELTA CHAPTER: $40,000 · OtherIIDA NEW YORK CHAPTER-V: $35,309 · Other+19 more: $213,091 · Other+19 moreCOUNCIL FOR INTERIOR DESIGN ACCREDI: $32,000 · Education
Other$901,101Education$32,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOUNCIL FOR INTERIOR DESIGN ACCREDI: $32,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COUNCIL FOR INTERIOR DESIGN ACCREDI ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization International Interior Design Assn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from International Interior Design Assn. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on International Interior Design Assn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph