Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

International Foundation for Electoral Systems

Ifes is dedicated to extending democracy worldwide through providing technical assistance in voter education, election administration, civil society, governance, rule of law and political processes.

$5.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$989k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Public Benefit$3.5MArts & Culture$1.0MCrime & Legal$795kInternational$410kHealth$20k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 5 grants below total $1,983,229 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $5,680,526 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $3,697,297 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $57k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $143k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.8M
$143,016
Median grant
4
States reached
$37M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERNEWS NETWORK$988,551
AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION$794,996
GLOBAL HUNGER PROJECT$143,016
FREE RUSSIA FOUNDATION$31,666
ETHNIC NATIONALITIES$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ETHNIC NATIONALITIES: $25k → 11%INTERNEWS NETWORK: $989k → 18%GLOBAL HUNGER PROJECT: $143k → 17%FREE RUSSIA FOUNDATION: $32k → 14%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $12k → 14%MOBILE ACCORD INC: $30k → 12%INTERNEWS NETWORK: $497k → 18%GLOBAL HUNGER PROJECT: $88k → 17%NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS: $108k → 14%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $8k → 14%NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS: $65k → 14%NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS: $6k → 14%AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION: $1.0M → 14%AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION: $909k → 14%AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION: $813k → 14%AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION: $795k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Grants abroad, by region — $3.7M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 8 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

East Asia and the Pacific$1.3M · 36% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: PROGRAMMATIC AND TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES

Middle East and North Africa$898k · 24% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: PROGRAMMATIC AND TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES

Russia and Neighboring States$511k · 14% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: PROGRAMMATIC AND TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES

South Asia$456k · 12% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: PROGRAMMATIC AND TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES

Sub-Saharan Africa$234k · 6% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: PROGRAMMATIC AND TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES

Central America and the Caribbean$126k · 3% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: PROGRAMMATIC AND TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$102k · 3% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: PROGRAMMATIC AND TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES

South America$69k · 2% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: PROGRAMMATIC AND TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.7M · 5 repeat orgs$86k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
1

Total granted

$5.7M
$30k

Still filing today

80%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $57k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AB
    American Bar Association
    4× · 2021–2024 · $3.5M · revenue +92%
  • IN
    INTERNEWS NETWORK
    5× · 2019–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +67%
  • ND
    NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS
    3× · 2021–2023 · $179k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • MA
    Mobile Accord Inc (TA GeoPoll)
    one grant, 2021 · $30k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
3/5
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

American Bar Association — $3,530,724 · OtherAmerican Bar Association+3 more — $74,748 · OtherINTERNEWS NETWORK — $1,703,321 · Arts & CultureINTERNEWS NETWORKTHE GLOBAL HUNGER PROJECT — $230,831 · InternationalNATIONAL DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS — $179,318 · InternationalFREE RUSSIA FOUNDATION — $31,666 · International
Other$3,605,472Arts & Culture$1,703,321International$441,815

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAmerican Bar Association — $3,530,724 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetINTERNEWS NETWORK — $1,703,321 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetTHE GLOBAL HUNGER PROJECT — $230,831 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetNATIONAL DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS — $179,318 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFREE RUSSIA FOUNDATION — $31,666 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds American Bar Association
  • Who funds INTERNEWS NETWORK
  • Who funds THE GLOBAL HUNGER PROJECT
  • Who funds NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS
  • Who funds FREE RUSSIA FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCA5.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization International Foundation for Electoral Systems funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph