Skip to content

· Public charity

International Documentary Foundation Inc

We are dedicated to the vision of a world where documentary creators flourish.

$9.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
61
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$1.5M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$42MPhilanthropy$7.2MCommunity Improvement$2.0MEnvironment$1.6MPublic Benefit$1.4MHealth$1.2MHuman Services$1.1MScience & Tech$629kOther$0
02FY2025 · 61 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 61 grants below total $5,876,580, the rows itemized in this filing. The $9,884,039 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $4,007,459 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $92k
  • $10k–50k24 grants · $564k
  • $50k–250k21 grants · $2.4M
  • $250k+4 grants · $2.8M
$29,538
Median grant
13
States reached
$7.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DEMETRIUS LLC$1,480,000
NICK MOLLE PRODUCTIONS INC$585,968
BULLER FILMS LLC$390,114
RONALD M BLATMAN INC$343,735
TEN THOUSAND X WISCHES LLC$246,719
COMPLEXLY LLC$232,500
SPECTROTECHNICS LLC$213,900
TERRACE FILMS LLC$185,000
UNAFF$160,803
ERA DOCUMENTARY LLC$140,177
C2C MEDIA LLC$105,818
ISKANDER FILMS INC$102,300
GRAHAM STREET PRODUCTIONS LLC$102,221
237 THOMPSON STREET LLC$99,385
ARCHIVAL PRODUCERS ALLIANCE LLC$96,155
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 90% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%College Innovation Project LLC: $351k → 14%BRAND RENEWABLE LLC: $538k → 10%NICK MOLLE PRODUCTIONS INC: $586k → 11%Fighting in the Dark LLC: $290k → 18%MM FILMS LLC: $594k → 7%BULLER FILMS LLC: $390k → 11%Ben Loeterman Productions Inc: $434k → 16%BRAND RENEWABLE LLC: $494k → 10%NICK MOLLE PRODUCTIONS INC: $409k → 11%MM Films LLC: $356k → 7%RONALD M BLATMAN INC: $344k → 10%BRAND RENEWABLE LLC: $357k → 10%MIRA STUDIOS LLC: $261k → 23%Leroy & Morton Productions LLC: $763k → 17%O'MALLEY CREADON PRODUCTIONS: $943k → 14%O'Malley Creadon Productions: $711k → 14%O'Malley Creadon Productions: $471k → 14%O'Malley Creadon Productions: $277k → 14%110TH STREET FILMS LLC: $385k → 17%110TH STREET FILMS LLC: $355k → 17%The Ebony Project LLC: $519k → 20%Medical Revolution in Progress View Film Inc: $319k → 14%Medical Revolution: $272k → 14%Race To Save The World LLC: $264k → 14%DEMETRIUS LLC: $1.5M → 17%The Mosaic Group Inc: $601k → 17%UPPER EAST FILMS LLC: $458k → 17%KEN ROSENBERG: $348k → 17%Upper East Films: $332k → 17%KEN ROSENBERG: $287k → 17%Ojeda Films Inc: $282k → 17%Us Four Productions LLC: $816k → 17%Us Four Productions LLC: $571k → 17%TEN THOUSAND X WISCHES LLC: $285k → 14%Disclosure Films LLC: $395k → 14%Tremolo Productions: $570k → 14%And She Could Be Next LLC: $300k → 14%And She Could Be Next LLC: $300k → 14%AND SHE COULD BE NEXT LLC: $278k → 14%CONMOTO CREATIVE COMPANY LLC: $466k → 14%IQ190 Productions LLC: $323k → 14%O'Malley Creadon Productions: $947k → 14%Firethorne Films LLC: $645k → 14%Firethorne Films LLC: $497k → 14%ONE LAST HUG 2: $298k → 14%Teflon Film LLC: $559k → 14%UBANTU MOTION PICTURES: $366k → 14%LAURA GABBERT: $422k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
WA
MT
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of International Documentary Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

International Documentary Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$45M · 194 repeat orgs$14M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +91% since the first grant, against -2% for those funded once.

194 repeat relationships: 32 still active in FY2025, 162 since wound down; 29 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

194
266

Total granted

$45M
$11M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+91%
-2%

Still filing today

3%
6%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureCivil RightsEducationCommunity ImprovementInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • U
    UNAFF
    8× · 2017–2025 · $852k · revenue +91% · 98% of their budget
  • JV
    Just Vision Inc
    2× · 2019–2021 · $85k · revenue +9%
  • TG
    The George Washington University
    2× · 2022–2023 · $70k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • TM
    The Mosaic Group Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $601k
  • TP
    Tremolo Productions
    one grant, 2017 · $570k
  • CC
    CONMOTO CREATIVE COMPANY LLC
    one grant, 2024 · $466k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Independent Film Alliance F/K/a Stage 18
—
2
Dc Dox

Dc dox is a major international film festival in the nation's capital dedicated to promoting documentary film as a leading art form, championing new voices and innovations in non-fiction storytelling, and using film as a catalyst to engage…

—
3
The Filmmaker Fund
Philanthropy
4
American Documentary Inc

A national non-profit media arts organization, american documentary strives to make essential documentaries accessible as a catalyst for public discourse. we collaborate with passionate filmmakers to amplify their voices, nuture the…

Arts & Culture
5
WorkingFilms Inc

Recognizing the power of film to inspire, Working Films positions documentaries to increase civic engagement and shift culture at the local, state, and national level.

Arts & Culture
6
Breaking Through the Lens

Advocate for gender equality in the film industry.

Arts & Culture
7
Exemplary Film Inc
—
8
Art of Brooklyn Festival

The Art of Brooklyn Film Festival is an annual event that brings Brooklyns celebrated film and media makers together with their peers across the country and around the world. AoBFF is a filmmaker-focused event, platform and showcase for…

Arts & Culture
9
Moonshot Initiative Inc

Promote gender equity in the film & television industry

Arts & Culture
10
Cinespeak
Arts & Culture
11
Center for Emerging Media Inc
Arts & Culture
12
Mamafilm Inc
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Independent Documentary Inc; the most unlike its peers is Level Ground. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 490 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
11/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

O'Malley Creadon Productions: $3,419,802 · OtherO'Malley Creadon Productions+192 more: $47,716,935 · Other+192 moreUNAFF: $851,932 · Arts & CultureTHE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC: $100,000 · Arts & CultureINDEPENDENT FEATURE PROJECT INC: $100,000 · Arts & CultureCAMERA NEWS INC: $65,000 · Arts & CultureWOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC: $60,000 · Arts & CultureJust Vision Inc: $85,000 · InternationalThe George Washington University: $70,000 · Education
Other$51,136,737Arts & Culture$1,176,932International$85,000Education$70,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNAFF: $851,932 over 8y, 98% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC: $100,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetINDEPENDENT FEATURE PROJECT INC: $100,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetJust Vision Inc: $85,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetThe George Washington University: $70,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC: $60,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNAFF ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sundance InstituteUT89.2× affinity58 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sundance Institute · The Film Collaborative Inc · Utah Film Center · Redford Center Inc · The Ford Foundation · Chicken & Egg Films Inc · Firelight Media Inc · Threshold Foundation · Field of Vision Inc · Video Veracity Inc · Center for Asian American Media · Perspective Media Initiatives Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization International Documentary Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from International Documentary Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Center for Independent Documentary Inc: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 490 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on International Documentary’s filings →

More from the funding graph