Skip to content

· Public charity

International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 731 Union

The organization is a labor union formed to organize all workers for the economic, moral, and social advancement of their condition and status.

$86k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Employment$182kHealth$110kEducation$80kReligion$75kPhilanthropy$57kHousing & Shelter$50kRecreation & Sports$50kYouth Development$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $10,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $85,928 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $75,928 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$8.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WORKING PARTNERSHIPS$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 86% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS: $10k → 11%TEAMSTERS LOCAL 25 STRIKE FUND: $10k → 16%WORKING PARTNERSHIPS: $10k → 11%JAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $25k → 14%IN SEARCH OF A CURE: $25k → 7%TEAMSTERS LOCAL 330: $10k → 8%IRISH FELLOWSHIP CLUB OF CHICAGO: $17k → 14%HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS: $10k → 11%JAMES R HOFFA MERMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $20k → 14%IN SEARCH OF A CURE: $25k → 7%IRISH FELLOWSHIP CLUB OF CHICAGO: $15k → 14%HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS: $10k → 11%TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $20k → 14%IN SEARCH OF A CURE: $10k → 7%IRISH FELLOWSHIP CLUB OF CHICAGO: $14k → 14%HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS: $10k → 11%TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $15k → 14%IN SEARCH OF A CURE: $10k → 7%IRISH FELLOWSHIP CLUB OF CHICAGO: $10k → 14%HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS: $10k → 11%IN SEARCH OF A CURE: $10k → 7%IRISH FELLOWSHIP CLUB OF CHICAGO: $10k → 14%TEAMSTERS JOINT COUNCIL 25 CHARITABLE TRUST: $10k → 14%TEAMSTERS JOINT COUNCIL 25 CHARITABLE TRUST: $10k → 14%TEAMSTERS JOINT COUNCIL 25 CHARITABLE TRUST: $10k → 14%CHICAGO ST PATRICK'S DAY PARADE: $10k → 14%CHICAGO ST PATRICK'S DAY PARADE: $10k → 14%GARDINER FAMILY FUND: $7k → 14%JAMES M SWEENEY GOLF CLASSIC: $10k → 14%JAMES M SWEENEY GOLF CLASSIC: $10k → 14%JAMES M SWEENEY GOLF CLASSIC: $10k → 14%JAMES M SWEENEY GOLF CLASSIC: $10k → 14%JAMES M SWEENEY GOLF CLASSIC: $10k → 14%JSE3AL FAMILY FOUNDATION - JAMES M SWEENEY GOLF CLASSIC: $7k → 14%EASTERSEALS: $10k → 14%MARCH OF DIMES INC: $10k → 14%IRISH FELLOWSHIP CLUB OF CHICAGO: $10k → 14%CHICAGO FEDERATION OF LABOR: $27k → 14%CHICAGO FEDERATION OF LABOR: $26k → 14%CHICAGO FEDERATION OF LABOR: $25k → 14%CHICAGO FEDERATION OF LABOR: $25k → 14%CHICAGO FEDERATION OF LABOR: $25k → 14%CHICAGO FEDERATION OF LABOR: $25k → 14%IN SEARCH OF A CURE: $10k → 14%TEAMSTERS JOINT COUNCIL 25 CHARITABLE TRUST: $10k → 14%TEAMSTERS JOINT COUNCIL 25 CHARITABLE TRUST: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$575k · 9 repeat orgs$82k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
6

Total granted

$575k
$72k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+24%

Still filing today

89%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationPublic BenefitHousing & ShelterEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CHICAGO FEDERATION OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL UNION COUNCIL
    6× · 2017–2022 · $152k · revenue +6%
  • IF
    IRISH FELLOWSHIP CLUB OF CHICAGO
    6× · 2017–2023 · $75k · revenue +64% · 44% of their budget
  • HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $50k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • JW
    JESSE WHITE FOUNDATION LTD
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -58%
  • MARCH OF DIMES INC
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -35%
  • TU
    TEAMSTERS UNION LOCAL 25 AFFILIATED WITH IBTgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +37%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 2010

To organize clerical employees of the university of california system in order to secure fair wages and better working conditions.

—
2
International Brotherhood of Teamsters

The objectives of this international union are to organize under one banner all workers engaged in industry; to educate them to cooperate in every movement which tends to benefit the organization; and to impress upon our membership,…

—
3
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union 137

Labor organization for various industries; ensuring fair wages and proper benefits for its members.

—
4
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union No 238

To organize all workers for the economic, moral and social advancement of their condition and status.

—
5
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Chauffers Warehousemen Local No 554

The organization is a local teamsters union whose mission is to represent their union members in negotioations with employers.

—
6
General Teamstersprofessional & Technical Employees Local Union 916

To provide support for its members through labor negotiations, collective bargaining agreements and by working towards eliminating unfair labor practices.

—
7
International Brotherhood of Teamsters

The mission of teamsters local 959 is to provide its members with representation in the workplace and to support the interests of labor everywhere.

—
8
Teamsters Local 1932

It is the mission of teamsters local 1932 to provide the best possible service to all our members with integrity and equality; to advance the social, economic, and educational welfare of the membership; to promote professional working…

—
9
International Brotherhood of 856 Tcwh Freight Checkers Clerical

Labor Union

—
10
Intl Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 252

The local union's mission is to organize and educate workers so that they have a voice in the workplace and know their workplace rights; involve workers in the political process and to negotiate with employers so that each worker is…

—
11
Chauffeurs Teamsters & Helpers Local 391

Labor union local-see form 990 part iii, line 4a

—
12
United Food and Commercial Workers International Union

To organize all workers for the economic, moral, and social advancement of their condition and status.

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Easter Seals Metropolitan Chicago Inc; the most unlike its peers is Jesse White Foundation Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
8/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHICAGO FEDERATION OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL UNION COUNCIL: $152,400 · OtherCHICAGO FEDERATION OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL UNION COUNCI…IRISH FELLOWSHIP CLUB OF CHICAGO: $75,400 · OtherIRISH FELLOWSHIP CLUB OF CHICAGOTEAMSTERS JOINT COUNCIL NO25 CHARITABLE TRUST: $50,000 · OtherTEAMSTERS JOINT COUNCIL NO25 CHARITABLE TRUSTST PATRICKS DAY PARADE COMM OF CHICAGO co James Coyne President: $20,000 · OtherST PATRICKS DAY PARADE COMM OF CHICAGO co James Coyne P…+3 more: $26,500 · Other+3 moreIN SEARCH OF A CURE: $90,000 · HealthIN SEARCH OF A CUR…MARCH OF DIMES INC: $10,000 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INCEASTER SEALS METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC: $10,000 · HealthEASTER SEALS METRO…JAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $45,000 · EducationJAMES R HOFFA MEMO…INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $35,000 · EducationINTERNATIONAL BROT…JESSE WHITE FOUNDATION LTD: $25,000 · EducationJESSE WHITE FOUNDA…SEAL-NSW FAMILY FOUNDATION: $57,400 · Public BenefitSEAL-NSW …HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterWorking Partnerships Inc: $10,000 · Employment
Other$324,300Health$110,000Education$105,000Public Benefit$57,400Housing & Shelter$50,000Employment$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHICAGO FEDERATION OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL UNION COUNCIL: $152,400 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetIN SEARCH OF A CURE: $90,000 over 6y, 6.4% of budgetIRISH FELLOWSHIP CLUB OF CHICAGO: $75,400 over 6y, 44% of budgetSEAL-NSW FAMILY FOUNDATION: $57,400 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTEAMSTERS JOINT COUNCIL NO25 CHARITABLE TRUST: $50,000 over 5y, 10% of budgetJAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $45,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetJESSE WHITE FOUNDATION LTD: $25,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEAMSTERS UNION LOCAL 25 AFFILIATED WITH IBT: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEASTER SEALS METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWorking Partnerships Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO 330: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 731 Union funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 731 Union. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 731 Union?

    Find your warmest path to International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 731 Union through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 731 Union’s filings →

    More from the funding graph