Skip to content
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No 292 at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No 292

To organize all workers for the economic, moral and social advancement of their condition and status.

$247k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Civil Rights$210kEducation$205kEmployment$167kFood & Nutrition$38kEnvironment$22kPublic Safety & Disaster$17kMembership Benefit$15kPublic Benefit$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $100,892, the rows itemized in this filing. The $247,398 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $146,506 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $89k
$14,250
Median grant
3
States reached
$29M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MINNESOTA STATEWIDE LIMITED ENERGY APPRENTICESHIP & TRAINING FUND$40,000
IBEW 292 RETIREES CLUB$35,000
UNION SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE$14,250
BUILDING STRONG COMMUNITIES$6,350
IBEW UNITY FUND$5,292
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 71% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MINNESOTA STATEWIDE LIMITED ENERGY APPRENTICESHIP & TRAINING FUND: $120k → 7%MINNEAPOLIS REGIONAL LABOR FEDERATION: $25k → 11%EAST CENTRAL AREA LABOR COUNCIL: $11k → 11%BUILDING STRONG COMMUNITIES: $6k → 14%INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS: $21k → 14%ELECTRICAL WORKERS HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $10k → 17%UNION SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE: $14k → 10%MINNESOTA STATEWIDE LIMITED ENERGY APPRENTICESHIP & TRAINING FUND: $45k → 7%IBEW LOCAL 292 RETIREES CLUB: $18k → 11%BUILDING STRONG COMMUNITIES: $6k → 14%INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS: $10k → 14%UNION SPORTSMEN ALLIANCE: $8k → 10%MINNESOTA STATEWIDE LIMITED ENERGY APPRENTICESHIP & TRAINING FUND: $40k → 7%IBEW LOCAL 292 RETIREES CLUB: $15k → 11%NORTH STAR POLICY INSTITUTE: $50k → 14%INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS: $6k → 14%WORKING PARTNERSHIPS: $11k → 11%NORTH STAR POLICY INSTITUTE: $50k → 14%IBEW UNITY FUND: $5k → 14%MINNEAPOLIS REGIONAL LABOR FEDERATION: $10k → 11%NORTH STAR POLICY INSTITUTE: $50k → 14%MINNEAPOLIS REGIONAL LABOR FEDERATION: $10k → 11%MINNEAPOLIS REGIONAL LABOR FEDERATION: $10k → 11%IBEW LOCAL 292 RETIREE'S CLUB: $48k → 11%IBEW LOCAL 292 RETIREE'S CLUB: $41k → 11%IBEW 292 RETIREES CLUB: $35k → 11%IBEW LOCAL 292 RETIREES CLUB: $20k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$663k · 8 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
3

Total granted

$663k
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+17%

Still filing today

75%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
EmploymentEducationEnvironmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MINNESOTA STATEWIDE LIMITED ENERGY APPRENTICESHIP & TRAINING TR FUND
    3× · 2023–2025 · $205k · revenue +16%
  • IB
    INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO 292
    3× · 2022–2025 · $124k · revenue +36%
  • IB
    INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS
    4× · 2017–2025 · $42k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FEDERATIN OF LABOR & CONGRESS OF INDUSTRIAL ORG EAST CENTRAL MN AREA LABOR COUNCIL
    one grant, 2024 · $11k · revenue -5%
  • WP
    Working Partnerships Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $11k · revenue +124%
  • EW
    ELECTRICAL WORKERS HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +17%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers 194 Local

Labor union - electrical workers

—
2
Laborers International Union of 341 Hcl

Union hall devoted to the betterment of members compensation and working conditions, to secure recognition of workers rights to engage in collective bargaining, and to promote the development and maintenance of on-the-job safety practices…

—
3
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 342

Labor union representing the electrical worker force

—
4
Laborers International Union of North America Local #165

Operation of local union.

—
5
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 606

The Union and its employees work for the benefit of its membership including negotiations of wages, benefits, and working conditions.

—
6
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union 72

Local Labor Union Representing Members of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

—
7
Iowa Laborers' Employers Cooperation & Education Trust

Improve communications between employers and local unions.

—
8
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No 110

Labor union

—
9
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 349

Maintain labor relations and promote the interest of its members in their employment as electrical workers.

—
10
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 77 & Subs

To provide the membership quality labor conditions.

—
11
Laborers' International Union of North America Laborers' Local #43

Promote and protect the interests of the members of the local

—
12
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers 0681 Local

Local Labor Union Representing Members of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers.

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Minneapolis Regional Labor Federation; the most unlike its peers is North Star Policy Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTH STAR POLICY INSTITUTE: $150,000 · OtherNORTH STAR POLICY INSTITUTEMinneapolis Regional Labor Federation: $55,000 · OtherMinneapolis Regional Labor FederationIBEW LOCAL 292 RETIREES CLUB: $53,000 · OtherIBEW LOCAL 292 RETIREES CLUBINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS: $42,292 · OtherINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERSAMERICAN FEDERATIN OF LABOR & CONGRESS OF INDUSTRIAL ORG EAST CENTRAL MN AREA LABOR COUNCIL: $11,000 · OtherMINNESOTA STATEWIDE LIMITED ENERGY APPRENTICESHIP & TRAINING TR FUND: $205,100 · EducationMINNESOTA STATEWIDE LIMITED ENERG…INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO 292: $124,000 · EmploymentINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOO…BUILDING STRONG COMMUNITIES INC: $12,350 · EmploymentBUILDING STRONG COMMUNIT…Working Partnerships Inc: $11,000 · EmploymentWorking Partnerships IncUNION SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE: $21,750 · EnvironmentELECTRICAL WORKERS HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$311,292Education$205,100Employment$147,350Environment$21,750Arts & Culture$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMINNESOTA STATEWIDE LIMITED ENERGY APPRENTICESHIP & TRAINING TR FUND: $205,100 over 3y, 7.4% of budgetINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO 292: $124,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMinneapolis Regional Labor Federation: $55,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS: $42,292 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNION SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE: $21,750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBUILDING STRONG COMMUNITIES INC: $12,350 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN FEDERATIN OF LABOR & CONGRESS OF INDUSTRIAL ORG EAST CENTRAL MN AREA LABOR COUNCIL: $11,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetWorking Partnerships Inc: $11,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetELECTRICAL WORKERS HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No 292 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No 292. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No 292’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home