Skip to content
International Brotherhood of 848 Tcwh at a glance

· Public charity

International Brotherhood of 848 Tcwh

To organize all workers and to secure improved wages, hours, working conditions and other economic advantages through organization, negotiations and collective bargaining.

$62k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Employment$49kCivil Rights$28kPhilanthropy$23kEducation$16kYouth Development$6kReligion$5k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $10,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $61,872 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $51,872 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 848 ALL CHARITIES FUND$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Labor Community Services: $9k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

50%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$63k · 3 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
7

Total granted

$63k
$63k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
+89%

Still filing today

100%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyHealthEducationReligionCivil RightsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LA
    LOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY
    3× · 2017–2021 · $32k · revenue +19%
  • T8
    TEAMSTERS 848 ALL CHARITIES FUND INC
    2× · 2020–2024 · $16k
  • JR
    JAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC
    2× · 2019–2022 · $16k · revenue +107%

Funded once

  • WF
    WORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +11%
  • NO
    No On Prop 22 sponsored by L
    one grant, 2020 · $13k
  • LC
    LABOR COMMUNITY SERVICES PROGRAM OF LOS ANGELESgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $9k · revenue +337%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Laborers International Union of 341 Hcl

Union hall devoted to the betterment of members compensation and working conditions, to secure recognition of workers rights to engage in collective bargaining, and to promote the development and maintenance of on-the-job safety practices…

—
2
Laborers' International Union of North America Local No 5

Labor union

—
3
The Laborers Pacific Southwest Regional Organizing Coalition

to organize workers in the laborers international union of north America, afl-cio pacific southwest region through a coordinated program to maintain and improve employment opportunities for affiliated local union members and to recruit new…

Employment
4
Local Union 890 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

Local union 890 of the international brotherhood of electrical workers was chartered on february 6, 1919 as a labor organization under the terms of the constitution of the international brotherhood of electrical workers and has…

—
5
Laborers International Union Local 4

Improvement of Workers Conditions, wages and benefits

—
6
Laborers International Union of North America - Local 1076

The local is a nonprofit organization established to represent its members in wage and fringe benefits matters in the construction industry. the local's primary areas of jurisdiction are oakland and livingston counties.

—
7
Laborers International Union of North America Local Union 44

Provide benefits of union membership

—
8
Teamsters Local 1932

It is the mission of teamsters local 1932 to provide the best possible service to all our members with integrity and equality; to advance the social, economic, and educational welfare of the membership; to promote professional working…

—
9
California State Council of Service Employees

The council coordinated the efforts of affiliated local unions and assisted their organizations work, bettering the working conditions of their members.

—
10
United Association of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plmbng & Pipe 353 Ppf

Operation of steamfitters' local union for the benefit of its members

—
11
Laborers International Union of Na Sewer and Tunnel Miners Union Local 2

Secure fair compensation and working conditions for all members.

—
12
Laborers Afl-Cio Local 1035

To organize all workers for the economic, moral, and social advancement of their condition and status.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Teamsters 848 All Charities Fund Inc; the most unlike its peers is Youth Helpers Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY: $32,300 · HealthLOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A N…No On Prop 22 sponsored by L: $13,078 · OtherNo On Prop 22 sponsored…International Brotherhood of 42 Joint Council: $7,500 · OtherInternational Brotherho…Victory Outreach: $5,320 · OtherVictory OutreachTEAMSTERS 848 ALL CHARITIES FUND INC: $15,600 · PhilanthropyTEAMSTERS 848 ALL CH…The Southern California & Southern Nevada Teamsters JC 42 Charity Fund Inc: $7,000 · PhilanthropyThe Southern Califor…JAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $15,500 · EducationJAMES R HOFFA…WORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC: $15,000 · Civil RightsWORKING FAMIL…LABOR COMMUNITY SERVICES PROGRAM OF LOS ANGELES: $9,480 · Human ServicesYOUTH HELPERS INC: $5,980 · Religion
Health$32,300Other$25,898Philanthropy$22,600Education$15,500Civil Rights$15,000Human Services$9,480Religion$5,980

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY: $32,300 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTEAMSTERS 848 ALL CHARITIES FUND INC: $15,600 over 2y, 8.9% of budgetJAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $15,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetWORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLABOR COMMUNITY SERVICES PROGRAM OF LOS ANGELES: $9,480 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetInternational Brotherhood of 42 Joint Council: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Southern California & Southern Nevada Teamsters JC 42 Charity Fund Inc: $7,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetYOUTH HELPERS INC: $5,980 over 1y, 5.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Teamsters Local 1932International Brother…International Brother…Teamsters Local 986 C…
Teamsters Local 1932CA15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Teamsters Local 1932 · International Brotherhood of 572 TCWH · International Brotherhood of 063 TCWH · Teamsters Local 986 Charity Fund Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization International Brotherhood of 848 Tcwh funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from International Brotherhood of 848 Tcwh. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to International Brotherhood of 848 Tcwh?

    Find your warmest path to International Brotherhood of 848 Tcwh through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on International Brotherhood of 848 Tcwh’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home