Skip to content
International Brotherhood of 26 Neca Labor Mngmt Coop Comm Tr Fu at a glance

· Public charity

International Brotherhood of 26 Neca Labor Mngmt Coop Comm Tr Fu

The organization is engaged in education and information programs designated to improve communications between representatives of labor and management for a local union of electrical workers.

$180k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Employment$384kRecreation & Sports$75kYouth Development$30kCommunity Improvement$29kCivil Rights$16kPhilanthropy$11k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $162,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $179,808 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $17,308 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $80k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Foundation for Fair Contracting$75,000
Naval Academy Athletic Association$30,000
Md Center for Construction Education and Innovatio$25,000
Mobilizing and organizing virginians for engagemen$15,000
Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Washington$10,000
FAIRFAX NAACP$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 75% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Hill-Murphy-Hill Partners Inc: $8k → 17%Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Washington: $10k → 14%Mobilizing and organizing virginians for engagemen: $15k → 6%CAPITAL YOUTH EMPOWERMENT PROGRAM INC: $10k → 9%Naval Academy Athletic Association: $30k → 6%ELECTRICAL WELFARE TRUST FUND: $12k → 11%Md Center for Construction Education and Innovatio: $25k → 11%Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Washington: $10k → 14%Northern Virginia Labor Federation: $25k → 6%NAVAL ACADEMY ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION: $25k → 6%MD CENTER FOR CONSTRUCTION EDUCATION AND INNOVATIO: $25k → 11%Foundation for Fair Contracting: $75k → 14%Northern Virginia Labor Federation: $11k → 6%NAVAL ACADEMY ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION: $20k → 6%MD CENTER FOR CONSTRUCTION EDUCATION AND INNOVATIO: $10k → 11%Foundation for Fair Contracting: $75k → 14%NECA Washington DC Chapter: $6k → 6%Foundation for Fair Contracting: $75k → 14%Foundation for Fair Contracting: $50k → 14%A Philip Randolph Educational Fund: $9k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$466k · 5 repeat orgs$79k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +65% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
6

Total granted

$466k
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
+8%

Still filing today

80%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EmploymentEducationCivil RightsYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MARYLAND CENTER FOR CONSTRUCTION EDUCATION AND INNOVATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $60k · revenue +527%
  • NV
    Northern Virginia CLC AFL-CIO
    2× · 2020–2022 · $36k · revenue +31%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER WASHINGTON FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +65%

Funded once

  • EW
    ELECTRICAL WELFARE TRUST FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $12k · revenue +19%
  • TB
    THE BAYARD RUSTIN FUND INC
    one grant, 2020 · $11k · revenue -44%
  • CY
    CAPITAL YOUTH EMPOWERMENT PROGRAM INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Electrical Contractors of Assn Inc

Bargaining representative

—
2
Central Virginia Electrical Contractors Associatio

The organization supports electrical contractors via apprenticeship programs and membership

—
3
Eastern Atlantic States Regional Council of Carpenters

Labor union maintaining and improving the benefit and working conditions of members engaged in the carpentry trade.

—
4
National Electrical Contractors Association of Santa Clara

Education and training for electrical contractor members. labor relations regarding international brotherhood of electrical workers.

—
5
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 606

The Union and its employees work for the benefit of its membership including negotiations of wages, benefits, and working conditions.

—
6
Virginia Afl-Cio

The Virginia AFL-CIO monitors all legislation affecting the working people of Virginia. To keep the state's labor standards on a progressive track for all working people, we work to win the fight against passage of laws that would have a…

Employment
7
Independent Electrical Contractors of Greater Cincinnati

The general betterment of the electrical industry and trade, and for the exchange of ideas and information to better conditions in the electrical industry, and doing of all things necessary or incidental to, or in the futherance of, any or…

—
8
Virginia Maryland and Delaware Association of Electric Cooperatives

Trade association for electric cooperatives

—
9
Maryland Building Industry Assoc Inc

To provide information to individuals about current issues in the industry and to provide education in the construction trade.

Community Improvement
10
Cascade Chapter Neca

To support electrical contractors through information, education, training, and representation during negotiations with labor unions and other labor related matters.

—
11
Washington Federation of State Employees Local 443

To provide labor relations and contract administration for members of local 442

—
12
Construction Employers Association of North Central Wv Inc

Negotiation between employers & unions.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northern Virginia Clc Afl-Cio; the most unlike its peers is The Bayard Rustin Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FOUNDATION FOR FAIR CONTRACTING - MID-ATLANTIC REGION: $275,000 · EmploymentFOUNDATION FOR FAIR CONTRACTING - MID-ATLANTIC REGIONNAVAL ACADEMY ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION: $75,000 · OtherNAVAL ACADEMY ATHLETIC ASSOCIATIONNorthern Virginia CLC AFL-CIO: $36,109 · OtherNorthern Virginia CLC AFL-CIOBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER WASH…ELECTRICAL WELFARE TRUST FUND: $12,493 · OtherELECTRICAL WELFARE TRUST FUNDTHE BAYARD RUSTIN FUND INC: $11,194 · OtherTHE BAYARD RUSTIN FUND INCHill-Murphy-Hill Partners Inc: $8,000 · OtherNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE: $7,500 · Other+1 more: $5,810 · OtherMARYLAND CENTER FOR CONSTRUCTION EDUCATION AND INNOVATION: $60,000 · EducationMARYLAND CEN…MOBILIZING AND ORGANIZING VIRGINIANS FOR ENGAGEMENT: $15,000 · Community ImprovementCAPITAL YOUTH EMPOWERMENT PROGRAM INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentA PHILIP RANDOLPH EDUCATIONAL FUND: $8,806 · Civil Rights
Employment$275,000Other$176,106Education$60,000Community Improvement$15,000Youth Development$10,000Civil Rights$8,806

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOUNDATION FOR FAIR CONTRACTING - MID-ATLANTIC REGION: $275,000 over 4y, 25% of budgetMARYLAND CENTER FOR CONSTRUCTION EDUCATION AND INNOVATION: $60,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetNorthern Virginia CLC AFL-CIO: $36,109 over 2y, 17% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetMOBILIZING AND ORGANIZING VIRGINIANS FOR ENGAGEMENT: $15,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetELECTRICAL WELFARE TRUST FUND: $12,493 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL YOUTH EMPOWERMENT PROGRAM INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetA PHILIP RANDOLPH EDUCATIONAL FUND: $8,806 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetNATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOC WASHINGTON DC CHAPTER: $5,810 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization International Brotherhood of 26 Neca Labor Mngmt Coop Comm Tr Fu funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from International Brotherhood of 26 Neca Labor Mngmt Coop Comm Tr Fu. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 29%
  • Maryland Center for Construction Education and Innovation: 29% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on International Brotherhood of 26 Neca Labor Mngmt Coop Comm Tr Fu’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home