· Public charity
International Brotherhood of 26 Neca Labor Mngmt Coop Comm Tr Fu
The organization is engaged in education and information programs designated to improve communications between representatives of labor and management for a local union of electrical workers.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 6 grants below total $162,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $179,808 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $17,308 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $80k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Foundation for Fair Contracting | $75,000 |
| Naval Academy Athletic Association | $30,000 |
| Md Center for Construction Education and Innovatio | $25,000 |
| Mobilizing and organizing virginians for engagemen | $15,000 |
| Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Washington | $10,000 |
| FAIRFAX NAACP | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 75% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +65% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MCMARYLAND CENTER FOR CONSTRUCTION EDUCATION AND INNOVATION3× · 2022–2024 · $60k · revenue +527%
- NVNorthern Virginia CLC AFL-CIO2× · 2020–2022 · $36k · revenue +31%
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER WASHINGTON FOUNDATION2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +65%
Funded once
- EWELECTRICAL WELFARE TRUST FUNDone grant, 2023 · $12k · revenue +19%
- TBTHE BAYARD RUSTIN FUND INCone grant, 2020 · $11k · revenue -44%
- CYCAPITAL YOUTH EMPOWERMENT PROGRAM INCone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +9%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Bargaining representative
The organization supports electrical contractors via apprenticeship programs and membership
Labor union maintaining and improving the benefit and working conditions of members engaged in the carpentry trade.
Education and training for electrical contractor members. labor relations regarding international brotherhood of electrical workers.
The Union and its employees work for the benefit of its membership including negotiations of wages, benefits, and working conditions.
The Virginia AFL-CIO monitors all legislation affecting the working people of Virginia. To keep the state's labor standards on a progressive track for all working people, we work to win the fight against passage of laws that would have a…
The general betterment of the electrical industry and trade, and for the exchange of ideas and information to better conditions in the electrical industry, and doing of all things necessary or incidental to, or in the futherance of, any or…
Trade association for electric cooperatives
To provide information to individuals about current issues in the industry and to provide education in the construction trade.
To support electrical contractors through information, education, training, and representation during negotiations with labor unions and other labor related matters.
To provide labor relations and contract administration for members of local 442
Negotiation between employers & unions.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northern Virginia Clc Afl-Cio and the most unlike its peers is The Bayard Rustin Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR FAIR CONTRACTING - MID-ATLANTIC REGION ↗
- Who funds MARYLAND CENTER FOR CONSTRUCTION EDUCATION AND INNOVATION ↗
- Who funds Northern Virginia CLC AFL-CIO ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MOBILIZING AND ORGANIZING VIRGINIANS FOR ENGAGEMENT ↗
- Who funds ELECTRICAL WELFARE TRUST FUND ↗
- Who funds THE BAYARD RUSTIN FUND INC ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL YOUTH EMPOWERMENT PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds A PHILIP RANDOLPH EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOC WASHINGTON DC CHAPTER ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization International Brotherhood of 26 Neca Labor Mngmt Coop Comm Tr Fu funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Maryland Center for Construction Education and Innovation — 29% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.