Skip to content
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants: funding profile →

Washington, D.C. · Public charity

International Association for the Study of Pain

Iasp brings together scientists, clinicians, health-care providers, and policymakers to stimulate and support the study of pain and to translate that knowledge into improved pain relief worldwide.

$198k
Granted FY2023
2
Itemized grants FY2023
1
Organizations funded FY2023
100%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2023
$20k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2023
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2023
$10,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 3
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2023
1
Total assets, FY2023
$9.3M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 100% of the organizations International Association for the Study of Pain funded were first-time grantees, receiving 100% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
EducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20231$20k100%
FY20222$35k100%
FY20212$120k100%
FY20201$20k100%
FY20193$39k100%
FY20182$115k100%
FY20171$20kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Education$255kHealth$79kScience & Tech$55k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
NY
OH
PA
CT
CA
MO
TN
NC
GA

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
New York University$100,00010%
Duke University$100,00010%
Emory University$20,00010%
Children's Hospital Medical Center$20,00010%
St Louis University$20,00010%
Seattle Children's Hospital$20,00010%
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Foundation Inc$20,00010%
University of California Davis$15,0001n/a
Duquesne University of the Holy Spirit$15,00010%
University of Minnesota Foundation$15,00010%
Show all 12 grantees
All grantees of International Association for the Study of Pain by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
New York University$100,00010%
Duke University$100,00010%
Emory University$20,00010%
Children's Hospital Medical Center$20,00010%
St Louis University$20,00010%
Seattle Children's Hospital$20,00010%
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Foundation Inc$20,00010%
University of California Davis$15,0001n/a
Duquesne University of the Holy Spirit$15,00010%
University of Minnesota Foundation$15,00010%
Vanderbilt University Medical Center$15,00010%
Wizehive Inc$9,3201n/a

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget International Association for the Study of Pain supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNew York University: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDuke University: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Medical Center: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSt Louis University: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSeattle Children's Hospital: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Foundation Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDuquesne University of the Holy Spirit: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Minnesota Foundation: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 10.

Compare International Association for the Study of Pain with peer funders

About International Association for the Study of Pain

How much does International Association for the Study of Pain give?
International Association for the Study of Pain reported 2 itemized grants totaling $20,000, out of $198,239 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2023 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 3 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does International Association for the Study of Pain fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2023, its largest causes are Education (65%), Health (20%), Science & Tech (14%).
Who are International Association for the Study of Pain's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2023: New York University ($100k), Duke University ($100k), Emory University ($20k).
Does International Association for the Study of Pain fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 100% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Where is International Association for the Study of Pain based?
International Association for the Study of Pain is based in DC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $367k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on International Association for the Study of Pain’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home