Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer

Be the multidisciplinary world authority on lung and other thoracic cancers through colllaborative science, education, and advocacy in order to ensure optimal prevention and patient care.

$1.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$425k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$1.1MEducation$62k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 6 grants below total $712,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,321,050 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $608,550 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k5 grants · $288k
  • $250k+1 grant · $425k
$50,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$36M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LUNG CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION$425,000
LUNG CANCER FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$87,500
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA$50,000
MAYO CLINIC$50,000
FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CTR$50,000
DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 33% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $50k → 16%LUNG CANCER FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $100k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $50k → 14%UT SOUTHWESTERN CASH MANAGEMENT: $20k → 14%MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $25k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER - ANSCHUTZ MEDICAL CAMPUS: $63k → 10%FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $50k → 9%LUNG CANCER FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $88k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
MA
PA
CA
CO
TX

Grants abroad, by region — $609k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 4 regions, $601k to organizations and $8k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$300k · 49% · 6 grants

Stated purpose: TRAINING

East Asia and the Pacific$158k · 26% · 2 grants · 1 person

Stated purpose: TRAINING · RESEARCH CONFERENCE ENTRY

Australia$100k · 16% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: TRAINING

South America$51k · 8% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: TRAINING

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LUNG CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $425,000 · HealthLUNG CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATIONLUNG CANCER FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $187,500 · HealthLUNG CANCER FOUNDATION OF AMERICADana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $50,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute IncMAYO CLINIC GROUP RETURN — $50,000 · HealthMAYO CLINIC GROUP RETURNM D ANDERSON SERVICES CORPORATION — $25,000 · HealthREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO — $62,500 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSI…FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER — $50,000 · OtherFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER …REGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA — $50,000 · OtherREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFOR…FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CTR — $50,000 · OtherFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER …THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTE — $20,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS…Indiana University School of Medicine — $11,682 · OtherJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $177,500 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNI…
Health$737,500Other$244,182Education$177,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLUNG CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $425,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetLUNG CANCER FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $187,500 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $177,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC GROUP RETURN — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetM D ANDERSON SERVICES CORPORATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University12% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2024

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph