· Public charity
Interlinc Family Foundation
The foundation's mission is to align our youth with people who will help them to realize their self-worth and encourage them to achieve a life of great hope, direction, and opportunity, and thereby, contribute to the betterment of the communities in which they live.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 3 grants below total $89,810 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $131,598 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $41,788 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $72k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CY-FAIR EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION | $72,000 |
| KIDS MEALS INC | $10,000 |
| BRADY BRIDGE INC | $7,810 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $313k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
11 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HAHouston Area Women's Center5× · 2017–2022 · $130k · revenue +110%
- HJHouston Junior Forum Inc4× · 2018–2022 · $42k · revenue +13%
- KMKIDS' MEALS INC4× · 2020–2024 · $35k · revenue +106%
Funded once
- PEPRO-VISION EDUCATIONAL SERVICES INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $41k · revenue +40%
- FRFrazier Revitalization Incone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue -27%
- LFLIGHTHOUSE FOR STUDENTSgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +82%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.
Homemade Hope provides weekly cooking sessions, holiday celebrations, and community field trips to at-risk children living in the Houston area.
The mission of Target Hunger is to alleviate hunger and its root causes in the Houston neighborhoods we serve. Target Hunger is on the front lines of hunger every day through its food distribution system that includes multiple food…
Kidz Grub's objective is to provide a nutritious dinner, educational assistance and a stable after school environment to the At Risk children of Houston.
Trees of hope transforms lives with fundraising and outreach activities for the exclusive benefit of childrens programs at star of hope, houston's largest mission for the homeless.
Seeking to put God's love into action, Houston Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to provide a world where everyone has a decent place to live.
Houston revision works to transform the lives of at risk youth by connecting them to positive adult role models, building a new community around strong, affirming peer groups, and preparing the youth for promising futures through education…
LifeHouse is a Christ-centered ministry ensuring life for unborn children by providing opportunities for housing, help, and hope for young women during their pregnancies and beyond.
The mission of the charity is to support causes related to children. this includes providing vehicles and other types of support to other organizations which provide direct support to children.
The children's fund, inc. is organized and operated to support all types of organizations formed to provide medical and social care for the needy and deserving children in the greater houston metropolitan area. recipient organizations are…
The mission of Family Service Center of Houston and Harris County (Family Houston) is to create a stronger community for tomorrow by helping individuals and families meet the challenges they face today. We help others help themselves.
We are a one hundred percent volunteer organization working to help meet the needs of underprivileged children in Hunt County Texas.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Children's Hunger Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Aum Capital Group Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 17 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CY-FAIR EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Houston Area Women's Center ↗
- Who funds Theatre Under the Stars Inc ↗
- Who funds INSPIRATION RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds Houston Junior Forum Inc ↗
- Who funds PRO-VISION EDUCATIONAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds OPERATION CARE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS' MEALS INC ↗
- Who funds The Kind Mouse Productions Inc ↗
- Who funds Frazier Revitalization Inc ↗
- Who funds AUM CAPITAL GROUP CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BRADY S BRIDGE INC ↗
- Who funds LIGHTHOUSE FOR STUDENTS ↗
- Who funds HIDE IN PLAIN SIGHT ↗
- Who funds HUDSON FAMILY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS COUNTRY OF HOUSTON INC ↗
- Who funds PRO-VISION INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED SPECIAL SPORTSMAN ALLIANCE I ↗
- Who funds BOOKS BETWEEN KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds HOUSTON WELCOMES REFUGEES ↗
- Who funds HOUSTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Hope Street of Tampa Inc ↗
- Who funds STORYBOOK FARM INC ↗
- Who funds RAHABS RETREAT AND RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds WEST NASHVILLE DREAM CENTER ↗
- Who funds DAILY BREAD COMMUNITY KITCHEN ↗
- Who funds HARNETT COUNTY AQUATIC CLUB ↗
- Who funds The Josh Willingham Foundation ↗
- Who funds GRACE KLEIN COMMUNITY INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HUNGER PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds JASON DUFNER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HARRIS HOME FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds JACKSON IN ACTION 83 FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INC OF DOTHAN ↗
- Who funds MISSION GREENSPOINT ↗
- Who funds DALLAS HOPE CHARITIES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Houston Community Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Houston Livestock Show and Rodeo Educational Fund · The Zions Bancorporation Foundation · Baker Hughes Foundation · Jack H & William M Light Charitable Trust · Dan L Duncan Foundation · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Strake Foundation · Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation · The Brown Foundation Inc · Centerpoint Energy Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Interlinc Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Kind Mouse Productions Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Interlinc Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Interlinc Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.