· Public charity
Inter-Tribal Council of Michigan Inc
To provide health & human services, as well as educational, energy assistance, and environmental programs for affiliated native american families in michigan.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $24k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $38k
- $50k–250k10 grants · $1.1M
- $250k+9 grants · $5.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BAY MILLS INDIAN COMMUNITY | $817,486 |
| HANNAHVILLE INDIAN COMMUNITY | $736,697 |
| KEWEENAW BAY INDIAN COMMUNITY | $661,541 |
| HANNAHVILLE INDIAN COMMUNITY | $641,896 |
| POKAGON BAND OF POTAWATOMI INDIANS | $632,655 |
| SAULT TRIBE INDIAN COMMUNITY | $465,517 |
| LAC VIEUX DESERT BAND OF LAKE | $393,867 |
| LITTLE TRAVERSE BAY BANDS OF ODAWA | $384,029 |
| SAGINAW CHIPPEWA INDIAN TRIBE | $258,382 |
| GRAND TRAVERSE BAND OF OTTAWA AND | $227,488 |
| HURON POTAWATOMI NATION | $226,252 |
| POKAGON BAND OF POTAWATOMI INDIANS | $125,380 |
| KEWEENAW BAY INDIAN COMMUNITY | $89,779 |
| LITTLE TRAVERSE BAY BANDS OF ODAWA | $85,033 |
| LITTLE RIVER BAND OF OTTAWA INDIANS | $80,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY24–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2024–2024.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2024 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: First Nations Development Institute · Great Lakes Fishery Trust Inc · National Indian Health Board
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Inter-Tribal Council of Michigan Inc?
Find your warmest path to Inter-Tribal Council of Michigan Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Inter-Tribal Council of Michigan’s filings →