· Public charity
Int'L Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftsmen Admin District Council
The purpose of the local is to organize all workers for the economic, moral and social advancement of their condition and status.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
How this is measured
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHICAGO FEDERATION OF LABOR | $17,500 |
| INTERNATIONAL MASONRY INSTITUTE | $15,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +13% since the first grant, against -15% for those funded once.
4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- CFCHICAGO FEDERATION OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL UNION COUNCIL7× · 2019–2025 · $143k · revenue -7%
- IMINTERNATIONAL MASONRY INSTITUTE6× · 2020–2025 · $59k · revenue +16%
- IIIllinois Institute of Technology2× · 2021–2022 · $25k · revenue +13%
Funded once
- PBPEGGY BROWNING FUNDone grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue -27%
- VYVOTE YES FOR WORKERS RIGHTSone grant, 2022 · $10k
- NPNAVY PIER INCone grant, 2024 · $8k · revenue 0%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
International labor union
Labor organization representing members in a variety of industries including construction, construction material production, steel mill services/slag processing, landscaping and many others principally in illinois, indiana and iowa. the…
Union hall devoted to the betterment of members compensation and working conditions, to secure recognition of workers rights to engage in collective bargaining, and to promote the development and maintenance of on-the-job safety practices…
Collective bargaining representation on behalf of members.
The organization is a trade union that represents operating engineers, who work as heavy equipment operators, mechanics,and surveyors in the construction industry, and stationary engineers, who work in operations and maintenance in…
Federation of Labor Organizations.
The work of the union, as the representative of its members, is to provide for the continuous employment of labor, to bring about stable conditions in the industry, and to establish necessary procedures for resolutions of disputes between…
To create a better working environment for the construction industry and its members.
Labor union maintaining and improving the benefit and working conditions of members engaged in the carpentry trade.
Labor union - electrical workers
How this is measured
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: International Union of Operating Engineers Local No 399 · Great Lakes Region Organizing Committee
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Int'L Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftsmen Admin District Council funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Int'L Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftsmen Admin District Council. Bigger dots raise more.
- International Masonry Institute: 35% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Int'L Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftsmen Admin District Council?
Find your warmest path to Int'L Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftsmen Admin District Council through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.