Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Int'L Assoc of H&F Insul & Allied Wkrs

The object of the international association of heat and frost insulators and allied workers shall be to assist its membership in securing employment, to defend the rights of members and advance their interests as working men and women, and by education and co-operation, to raise them to that position in society to which they are justly…

$77k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Employment$88kHealth$38kEducation$25kPhilanthropy$24kCivil Rights$22kRecreation & Sports$10kArts & Culture$6k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 2 grants below total $18,100 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $77,493 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $59,393 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$34M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TVTLC TVA LABOR MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE$10,000
INSULATORS INTERNATIONAL NON-FEDERAL POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$8,100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 88% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY: $10k → 9%IRISH PEACE FOUNDATION INC: $6k → 14%DIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%UNION SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE: $10k → 10%TVTLC TVA LABOR MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: $10k → 12%DELBARTON SCHOOL: $25k → 4%INSULATION INDUSTRY'S INTERNATIONAL APPRENTICE & TRAINING FUND: $31k → 11%TOYS FOR TOTS: $13k → 10%FRIENDS OF LONNIE STEPHENSON: $6k → 14%TVTLC TVA LABOR MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: $10k → 12%TISSUE BANK ASBESTOS RESEARCH CHARITABLE TRUST: $18k → 11%CMRAVE: $10k → 14%INSULATION INDUSTRY'S INTERNATIONAL APPRENTICE & TRAINING FUND: $16k → 11%DC TOYS FOR TOTS: $12k → 14%INSULATORS INTERNATIONAL NON-FEDERAL POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE: $8k → 11%CMRAVE: $10k → 14%INSULATORS INTERNATIONAL NON-FEDERAL POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE: $8k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Grants abroad, by region — $53k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

North America (Canada and Mexico)$53k · 100% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: SUPPORT

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$127k · 5 repeat orgs$85k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against -28% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
7

Total granted

$127k
$85k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
-28%

Still filing today

60%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’22’23’24’25
HealthEmploymentPhilanthropyEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • II
    INSULATION INDUSTRY'S INTERNATIONAL APPRENTICE & TRAINING FUND
    2× · 2022–2023 · $48k · revenue +16%
  • MT
    MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION
    3× · 2020–2022 · $24k · revenue +45%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR MILITARY RECRUITMENT ASSESSMENT AND VETERANS EMPLOYMENT
    3× · 2020–2022 · $20k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • SM
    ST MARYS ABBEY
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • TB
    TISSUE BANK ASBESTOS RESEARCH CHARITABLE TRUST
    one grant, 2023 · $18k · revenue -82%
  • US
    UNION SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -8%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 825ABCDRRH

The work of the union, as the representative of its members, is to provide for the continuous employment of labor, to bring about stable conditions in the industry, and to establish necessary procedures for resolutions of disputes between…

2
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

3
Laborer's International Union of North a

A fraternal labor organization whose purpose is to promote employment of members in a safe work environment and ensurefair labor practices.

4
Amalgamated Transit Union

The object of the international union shall be to organize local unions. to place our occupation on a higher plane of intelligence, efficiency and skill; encourage settlement of disputes between employees and employers; secure employment…

5
International Liquid Terminals Association

To benefit our members by providing resources that enable the liquid terminal industry to thrive.

6
Asphalt Institute Inc

Through education, engineering, technical development, environmental stewardship and marketing leadership, the asphalt institute promotes the safe use, benefits, and quality performance of petroleum asphalts in a unified voice for our…

7
International Life Sciences Institute

Ilsi is a global, nonprofit federation dedicated to generating and advancing emerging science and groundbreaking research to ensure foods are safe, nutritious and sustainable, and that they improve planetary and human health and well-being…

Science & Tech
8
Afl-Cio Technology Institute

The institute's mission is to conduct research and education on the role of worker voice in the innovation economy and to ensure the benefits of technology are broadly shared, creating good union jobs in communities across the country,…

Civil Rights
9
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

10
Association of Union Constructors

Our mission is to act as an advocate for the union construction and maintenance industry advancing the cause through an educated and action-driven membership. we aim to enhance labor-management cooperation, workplace safety and health, and…

11
Laborers International Union of Na Sewer and Tunnel Miners Union Local 2

Secure fair compensation and working conditions for all members.

12
International Brotherhood of Teamsters

The objectives of this international union are to organize under one banner all workers engaged in industry; to educate them to cooperate in every movement which tends to benefit the organization; and to impress upon our membership,…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Building and Construction Trades Department Afl-Cio and the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

INSULATION INDUSTRY'S INTERNATIONAL APPRENTICE & TRAINING FUND — $47,502 · EmploymentINSULATION INDUSTRY'S INTERNATIONAL …CENTER FOR MILITARY RECRUITMENT ASSESSMENT AND VETERANS EMPLOYMENT — $20,000 · EmploymentCENTER FOR MILITARY RECRUITMENT ASSE…ST MARYS ABBEY — $25,000 · OtherST MARYS ABBEYTVTLCTVA LABOR MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE — $20,000 · OtherTVTLCTVA LABOR MANAGEMENT CONFERENC…INSULATORS INTERNATIONAL NON-FEDERAL POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE — $15,725 · OtherINSULATORS INTERNATIONAL NON-FEDERA…FRIENDS OF LONNIE STEPHENSON — $5,600 · OtherFRIENDS OF LONNIE STEPHENSONTISSUE BANK ASBESTOS RESEARCH CHARITABLE TRUST — $18,400 · HealthTISSUE BANK ASBESTOS…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $10,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED …DIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · HealthDIABETES RESEARCH IN…MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $24,000 · PhilanthropyMARINE TOYS FOR …IRISH PEACE FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 · PhilanthropyIRISH PEACE FOUN…UNION SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE — $10,000 · Environment
Employment$67,502Other$66,325Health$38,400Philanthropy$30,000Environment$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetINSULATION INDUSTRY'S INTERNATIONAL APPRENTICE & TRAINING FUND — $47,502 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $24,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR MILITARY RECRUITMENT ASSESSMENT AND VETERANS EMPLOYMENT — $20,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTISSUE BANK ASBESTOS RESEARCH CHARITABLE TRUST — $18,400 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetUNION SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIRISH PEACE FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

International Assn of Bridge Structural Ornamental and Reinforcing Iron WorkersDC13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: International Assn of Bridge Structural Ornamental and Reinforcing Iron Workers · International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Int'L Assoc of H&F Insul & Allied Wkrs funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph