Skip to content

· Private foundation

Inspire & Achieve Corporation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$300
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$300
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$119kEducation$107kScience & Tech$25kReligion$11kArts & Culture$10kYouth Development$6kPhilanthropy$5kHuman Services$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$300
Median grant
1
States reached
$20
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAJOR VIRTUAL INNOVATIONS$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HUNTSVILLE MARGARITA SOCIETY: $1k → 11%WEDC FOUNDATION: $600 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
PA
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$227k · 20 repeat orgs$76k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
68

Total granted

$227k
$76k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+17%

Still filing today

25%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $300 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    ASCTE FOUNDATION FKA ALABAMA SCHOOL OF CYBER AND ENGINEERING FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2019–2022 · $16k · revenue +216%
  • SC
    Spelman College
    3× · 2017–2019 · $16k · revenue +46%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTH ALABAMA
    2× · 2018–2019 · $5k · revenue +88%

Funded once

  • AA
    ALABAMA A&M UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $13k · revenue +292%
  • HC
    HUNTSVILLE-MADISON COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -54%
  • UW
    United Way of Madison County Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Higher Education Partnership Foundation Inc

To advocate the importance of higher education in bettering the lives of people in alabama.

Education
2
The University Foundation

The university foundation is organized to assist and aid the board of trustees of the university of alabama in fulfilling its educational, research, and public service programs and activities.

—
3
Alabama a&M University Trust for Educational Excellence

The Trusts mission is to support and improve educational excellence at Alabama A&M University through the granting of academic scholarships at the Unviversity, the endowment of academic chairs, the subsidizing of current faculty positions,…

Education
4
The Harvard Club of Alabama
Education
5
Alabama Higher Education Association D/B/a Higher Education Partnership

To advocate the importance of higher education in bettering the lives of people in alabama.

—
6
Uab Educational Foundation

To support the university of alabama at birmingham in its scientific and educational mission, including managing and disbursing funds, acquiring real property, and providing operational flexibility.

Education
7
University of North Alabama Foundation

To support the university of north alabama in its educational endeavors.

Education
8
Alabama Alliance Network

The alabama alliance netowrk works to strengthen and enhance alabama's civic society through research, education, and grantmaking

Public Benefit
9
Hudson-Alpha Institute for Biotechnology

The primary mission of the institute will be to use the increasingly powerful research tools being developed in the biotechnology area to better understand the causes of certain diseases and to apply the findings of such research to help…

Science & Tech
10
Alabama State University Trust for Educational Excellence

The trust seeks to support and improve educational excellence at alabama state university (the university) through the following: (1) granting of academic scholarships at the university, (2) endowment of academic chairs, (3) subsidizing of…

Education
11
Alabama Housing Authorities Education and Enrichment Fund Inc

To administer and award scholarships to low-income residents of Public Housing in Alabama.

Youth Development
12
Alabama High School of Mathematics and Science Foundation

Provide facilities and support for the alabama high school of mathematics and science

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Links Inc; the most unlike its peers is Encounter Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 89 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
16/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Alabama A&M University: $117,650 · OtherAlabama A&M UniversityUS SPACE AND ROCKET CENTER: $21,000 · OtherUS SPACE AND ROCKET CENTERALABAMA A&M UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $13,200 · OtherALABAMA A&M UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $10,500 · OtherUniversity of Alabama in Huntsville: $10,250 · OtherHUNTSVILLE-MADISON COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherAuburn University: $8,250 · Other+68 more: $55,374 · Other+68 moreASCTE FOUNDATION FKA ALABAMA SCHOOL OF CYBER AND ENGINEERING FOUNDATION INC: $16,000 · EducationASCTE FOUNDA…Spelman College: $15,500 · EducationSpelman Coll…AUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1,500 · Education+3 more: $1,760 · EducationMenil Foundation Inc: $4,764 · Arts & CultureMESERVE-KUNHARDT FOUNDATION: $4,750 · Arts & CultureBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTH ALABAMA: $5,200 · Youth DevelopmentDIVERSE EDUCATIONAL LIFE TRAINING ACTIVITIES INC: $200 · Youth DevelopmentUnited Way of Madison County Inc: $5,000 · PhilanthropyThe Huntsville Margarita Society: $1,000 · Human ServicesThe WEDC Foundation Inc: $600 · Human ServicesHEALS INC: $1,000 · Health
Other$246,224Education$34,760Arts & Culture$9,514Youth Development$5,400Philanthropy$5,000Human Services$1,600Health$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetASCTE FOUNDATION FKA ALABAMA SCHOOL OF CYBER AND ENGINEERING FOUNDATION INC: $16,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSpelman College: $15,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHUNTSVILLE-MADISON COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTH ALABAMA: $5,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMenil Foundation Inc: $4,764 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUDSONALPHA FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEADERSHIP ALABAMA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Huntsville Margarita Society: $1,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetHEALS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDOWNTOWN RESCUE MISSION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIRMINGHAM-SOUTHERN COLLEGE: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe WEDC Foundation Inc: $600 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOMEGA MEN OF NORTH ALABAMA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE LINKS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENCOUNTER MINISTRIES: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDEVELOPMENTAL ENHANCEMENT LIFE TRAINING ALLIANCE INC: $480 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ASCTE FOUNDATION FKA ALABAMA SCHOOL OF CYBER AND ENGINEERING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Spelman College ↗
  • Who funds ALABAMA A&M UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HUNTSVILLE-MADISON COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTH ALABAMA ↗
  • Who funds United Way of Madison County Inc ↗
  • Who funds Menil Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds MESERVE-KUNHARDT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HARRIS HOME FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds HUDSONALPHA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LEADERSHIP ALABAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds The Huntsville Margarita Society ↗
  • Who funds HEALS INC ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds BIRMINGHAM-SOUTHERN COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Greater HuntsvilleAL25.7× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Huntsville · Wallace E Kirkpatrick Family Foundation · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · The I3 Cares Foundation · The Northrop Grumman Foundation · Stender Family Foundation · Alpha Foundation · The Jane K Lowe Charitable Foundation · The Maynard Nexsen Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Inspire & Achieve Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Inspire & Achieve Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Inspire & Achieve Corporation?

    Find your warmest path to Inspire & Achieve Corporation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 89 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Inspire & Achieve’s filings →

    More from the funding graph