Skip to content

· Private foundation

Innovative Technology Education Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$392k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$71k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$3.4MRecreation & Sports$112kEnvironment$9k
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $126k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $249k
$23,573
Median grant
2
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORMANDY SCHOOLS COLLABORATIVE$70,515
SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OF UNIVERSITY CITY$60,564
MAPLEWOOD RICHMOND HEIGHTS SCHOOL DISTRICT$59,791
THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF UNIVERSITY CITY$58,594
HILLSBORO R-3 SCHOOL DISTRICT$30,000
LEBANON COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT$29,996
SUNRISE R-9 SCHOOL DISTRICT$23,573
AL-SALAM DAY SCHOOL$16,500
VALLEY PARK SCHOOL DISTRICT$12,954
HANCOCK PLACE SCHOOL DISTRICT$12,954
CONNECTED LEARNING$5,250
FERGUSON FLORISSANT SCHOOL DISTRICT$5,050
USGBC MO GATEWAY CHAPTER$5,000
NEBSA$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 87% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE FULTON SCHOOL: $56k → 9%LEBANON COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $30k → 15%SAINT LOUIS PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $71k → 21%SISTER THEA BOWMAN CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $46k → 16%PEINE RIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $35k → 5%FESTUS R-VI SCHOOL DISTRICT: $62k → 9%VENICE CUSD #3: $30k → 12%SISTER THEA BOWMAN CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $30k → 16%HILLSBORO R-3 SCHOOL DISTRICT: $30k → 9%RITENOUR SCHOOL DISTRICT: $84k → 11%RITENOUR SCHOOL DISTRICT: $43k → 11%DESOTO #73 SCHOOL DISTRICT: $30k → 9%LIFT FOR LIFE ACADEMY: $54k → 21%SAINT FRANCES CABRINI ACADEMY: $30k → 21%SUMNER HIGH SCHOOL: $65k → 21%PARKWAY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $42k → 11%GATEWAY MST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $30k → 21%FOX HIGH SCHOOL: $57k → 9%MAPLEWOOD RICHMOND HEIGHTS SCHOOL DISTRICT: $60k → 11%THE SOULARD SCHOOL: $68k → 21%HODGEN TECH ACADEMY: $49k → 21%FERGUSON FLORISSANT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $82k → 11%LIFT FOR LIFE ACADEMY: $41k → 21%FERGUSON FLORISSANT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $42k → 11%MARGARET BUERKLE MIDDLE SCHOOL: $61k → 11%CROSSROADS COLLEGE PREP: $45k → 21%MEHLVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $58k → 11%NOTRE DAME HIGH SCHOOL: $47k → 11%CROSSROADS COLLEGE PREP: $39k → 21%GATEWAY STEM HIGH SCHOOL: $51k → 21%CHRIST COMMUNITY LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $36k → 11%ADAMS ELEMENTARY: $35k → 21%CITY GARDEN MONTESSORI: $34k → 21%THE BIOME SCHOOL: $51k → 21%SAINT LOUIS LANGUAGE IMMERSION SCHOOL: $33k → 21%NORTH SIDE COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $30k → 21%SAINT LOUIS PRIORY SCHOOL: $33k → 11%LINDBERGH SCHOOL DISTRICT: $55k → 11%WALBRIDGE ELEMENTARY: $62k → 21%NORMANDY SCHOOLS COLLABORATIVE: $71k → 11%NORMANDY SCHOOLS COLLABORATIVE: $59k → 11%OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE: $30k → 11%MIRIAM ACADEMY: $30k → 11%HAZELWOOD EAST HIGH SCHOOL: $32k → 11%HAZELWOOD EAST HIGH SCHOOL: $31k → 11%WEBSTER GROVES SCHOOL DISTRICT: $67k → 11%SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OF UNIVERSITY CITY: $61k → 11%THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF UNIVERSITY CITY: $59k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 38 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +34% for those funded once.

38 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 28 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
59

Total granted

$2.2M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+34%

Still filing today

13%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $131k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LF
    LIFT FOR LIFE ACADEMY INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $112k · revenue +149%
  • TS
    THE SOULARD SCHOOL
    3× · 2017–2022 · $99k · revenue +63%
  • PI
    PROGRESS IN EDUCATION INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $34k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • SH
    SUMNER HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $65k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $62k
  • MB
    MARGARET BUERKLE MIDDLE SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $61k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Thomas Jefferson School

Thomas jefferson school engages its students in the education necessary to live as responsible citizens of the world. through the strongest possible college-prepatory program and within a nurturing community, students develop a…

—
2
La Salle Charter Schools Inc

La salle middle school is a public charter school located in st. louis. la salle is committed to transforming children and our community through innovative education. students at la salle are pushed to achieve excellence academically,…

Education
3
Grace Christian Academy St Louis

The mission of Grace Christian Academy is to first serve families and children by giving them a Biblically-based education centered on a growing relationship with Jesus Christ, imparting a Christian world view and emphasizing Godly…

Education
4
Momentum Academy Inc

Momentum academy is an open enrollment public charter school. momentum academy pursues academic excellence in a safe, supportive and loving learning environment.

Education
5
Siue Charter School

The mission of the siue east st. louis charter high school is to prepare sudents, who are career - and college - ready, upon graduation.

Education
6
Hogan Preparatory Academy Inc

Hogan preparatory academy is an exceptional k-12 public charter school where students become compassionate leaders who are college and career ready with a distinct competitive advantage.

Education
7
Saint Louis Sudbury School

Saint Louis Sudbury School offers self-directed education for ages 5-18. Our mission: "We believe that children are born with the drive and skills to create a meaningful and successful life and learn best when given the opportunity to…

Education
8
Hope Leadership Academy

To provide a world-class neighborhood school whose students excel in a culture of academic rigor, character development, and caring relationships.

Education
9
Gateway Science Academy of St Louis

Teachers, parents, and students work together to develop young people who are confident and achieve academic excellence in a powerful college prep curriculum. students do not question "whether" they will go to college but, instead, ask…

Education
10
Atlas Public Schools

Atlas public schools nurtures a thriving community by educating the whole child through a rigorous academic program enriched with real-world experiences, while prioritizing the support, growth, and sustainability of our dedicated educators.

Education
11
Louisville Collegiate School

Louisville collegiate school inspires academic excellence, extraordinary character and global citizenship.

Education
12
Capitol Hill Day School

Capitol Hill Day School is a co-educational independent school serving students from pre-kindergarten through 8th grade. Capitol Hill Day School deeply engages a diverse community of students in connecting the classroom with the larger…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Fulton School; the most unlike its peers is National Ebs Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 101 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FERGUSON-FLORISSANT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $161,830 · OtherRITENOUR SCHOOL DISTRICT: $130,904 · OtherNORMANDY SCHOOLS COLLABORATIVE: $129,515 · OtherSISTER THEA BOWMAN CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $128,546 · OtherMehlville School District: $109,641 · OtherSAINT LOUIS PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $105,984 · Other+86 more: $2,344,655 · Other+86 moreTHE SOULARD SCHOOL: $98,550 · EducationTHE SOULAR…THE FULTON SCHOOL: $56,354 · EducationTHE FULTON…THE BIOME SCHOOL: $51,000 · EducationTHE BIOME …PROGRESS IN EDUCATION INC: $33,800 · EducationPROGRESS I…CITY ACADEMY INC: $29,700 · EducationCITY ACADE…MARIAN MIDDLE SCHOOL: $26,500 · EducationMARIAN MID…Lafayette Preparatory Academy Inc: $25,764 · EducationLafayette …+1 more: $10,000 · EducationLIFT FOR LIFE ACADEMY INC: $111,997 · Recreation & Sports
Other$3,111,075Education$331,668Recreation & Sports$111,997

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLIFT FOR LIFE ACADEMY INC: $111,997 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetTHE SOULARD SCHOOL: $98,550 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetTHE FULTON SCHOOL: $56,354 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTHE BIOME SCHOOL: $51,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetPROGRESS IN EDUCATION INC: $33,800 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCITY ACADEMY INC: $29,700 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMARIAN MIDDLE SCHOOL: $26,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLafayette Preparatory Academy Inc: $25,764 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHAWTHORN LEADERSHIP SCHOOL FOR GIRLS: $16,735 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL EBS ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetMISSOURI GATEWAY GREEN BUILDING COUNCIL: $8,750 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetKIPP ST LOUIS: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COLLEGE SCHOOL ASSOCIATION: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LIFT FOR LIFE ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SOULARD SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE FULTON SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE BIOME SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds PROGRESS IN EDUCATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community FoundationMO25.7× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation Inc · The Opportunity Trust D/B/A Zest Education · World Wide Technology Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Jordan Mary R & Ettie a Charitable · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Project Lead the Way Inc · Dollar General Literacy Foundation · Olive Dempsey Charitable Trust · Dewitt and Caroline Van Evera Fdn

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Innovative Technology Education Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Innovative Technology Education Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Innovative Technology Education Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Innovative Technology Education Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 101 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Innovative Technology Education’s filings →

    More from the funding graph