Skip to content
Infectious Diseases Society of America at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Infectious Diseases Society of America

The mission of the INFECTIOUS DISEASES SOCIETY OF AMERICA (idsa) is to improve the health of individuals, communities, and society by promoting excellence in patient care, education, research, public health, and prevention of infectious diseases.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$4.0MEducation$250kArts & Culture$25kScience & Tech$10k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $250,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,060,246 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $810,246 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$250,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$66M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IDSA EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION$250,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 12% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $50k → 16%MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER: $100k → 28%NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $10k → 14%OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $50k → 12%VANDERBILT UNIV MED CTR: $50k → 14%RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $50k → 14%IDSA EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $992k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND: $100k → 19%PRATT MEDICAL GROUP INC: $50k → 16%SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTE: $25k → 14%VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $50k → 14%IDSA EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $863k → 7%IDSA EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $553k → 7%IDSA EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $250k → 7%IDSA EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $250k → 7%IDSA EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $250k → 7%IDSA EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $250k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
OR
CT
CO
NE
VA
MD
TN
DC

Grants abroad, by region: $512k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 8 regions, all to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$209k · 41% · 40 people

Stated purpose: GRANTS TO RECIPIENTS · PROGRAM SERVICES AND ASSISTANCE TO RECIPIENTS LOCATED IN THE REGION

East Asia and the Pacific$143k · 28% · 23 people

Stated purpose: GRANTS TO RECIPIENTS · PROGRAM SERVICES AND ASSISTANCE TO RECIPIENTS LOCATED IN THE REGION

North America (Canada and Mexico)$69k · 13% · 14 people

Stated purpose: GRANTS TO RECIPIENTS · PROGRAM SERVICES AND ASSISTANCE TO RECIPIENTS LOCATED IN THE REGION

South America$59k · 12% · 17 people

Stated purpose: GRANTS TO RECIPIENTS · PROGRAM SERVICES AND ASSISTANCE TO RECIPIENTS LOCATED IN THE REGION

South Asia$14k · 3% · 12 people

Stated purpose: GRANTS TO RECIPIENTS

Middle East and North Africa$8k · 2% · 5 people

Stated purpose: GRANTS TO RECIPIENTS · PROGRAM SERVICES AND ASSISTANCE TO RECIPIENTS LOCATED IN THE REGION

Sub-Saharan Africa$6k · 1% · 3 people

Stated purpose: PROGRAM SERVICES AND ASSISTANCE TO RECIPIENTS LOCATED IN THE REGION · GRANTS TO RECIPIENTS

Central America and the Caribbean$4k · 1% · 2 people

Stated purpose: GRANTS TO RECIPIENTS · PROGRAM SERVICES AND ASSISTANCE TO RECIPIENTS LOCATED IN THE REGION

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary

THE MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY ("THE INFIRMARY") IS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT TEACHING HOSPITAL CONDUCTING PATIENT CARE AND RESEARCH. THE INFIRMARY IS A TEACHING HOSPITAL OF HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL AND AN INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH.…

Health
2
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
3
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
4
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
5
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
6
Upmc Group

Healthcare, education, and research

—
7
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
8
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
9
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
10
New York Society for the Relief of the Ruptured and Crippled Maintaining the

The mission of hospital for special surgery is to provide the highest quality patient care, improve mobility, and enhance the quality of life for all and to advance the science of orthopedic surgery, rheumatology, and their related…

Health
11
Upmc

Support of subsidiary tax-exempt healthcare, education and research organizations (see schedule o)

Health
12
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Montefiore Medical Center; the most unlike its peers is Smithsonian Institution. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IDSA EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $3,408,527 · HealthIDSA EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION+5 more: $400,000 · Health+5 moreBOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA: $100,000 · OtherBOARD OF …SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $100,000 · OtherSEATTLE C…YALE UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · OtherYALE UNIV…TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER PHYSICIANS ORGANIZATION INC: $50,000 · OtherTUFTS MED…REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $50,000 · OtherREGENTS O…OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EducationSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $25,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $10,000 · Science & Tech
Health$3,808,527Other$350,000Education$50,000Arts & Culture$25,000Science & Tech$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIDSA EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $3,408,527 over 8y, 61% of budgetMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center: $100,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Maryland Medical System Corporation: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRush University Medical Center: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Infectious Diseases Society of America funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Infectious Diseases Society of America. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • Oregon Health & Science University Foundation: 1% of income from government
  • University of Maryland Medical System Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Infectious Diseases Society of America’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home