Skip to content

· Public charity

Indy Pride Inc

Indy Pride Inc.

$60k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Youth Development$161kCivil Rights$61kHealth$6kArts & Culture$6kHuman Services$5k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $22,872, the rows itemized in this filing. The $60,494 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $37,622 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$6,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$230k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERPRIDE$11,372
Indiana Pride of Color$6,000
INDY DRAG THEATER$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $172k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%TRANS SOLUTIONS RESEARCH AND RESOURCE CENTER: $5k → 16%DAMIEN CENTER: $6k → 16%INDIANA YOUTH GROUP: $116k → 16%INDIANA YOUTH GROUP: $21k → 16%INDIANA YOUTH GROUP: $11k → 16%INDIANA YOUTH GROUP: $8k → 16%INDIANA YOUTH GROUP: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Castle Rock Pride
Civil Rights
2
Community Pride Mi
Public Benefit
3
Nw Pa Pride Alliance Inc

Officially incorporated in 2012, NWPA Pride Alliance is the driving force behind Pride events in Erie and Crawford Counties, uniting and celebrating the Queer community since 1992. Our mission: to enhance visibility, foster unity, and…

Arts & Culture
4
Centre Lgbtqa Support Network

The Mission of Centre LGBT+ is to bring the community together through LGBT+ education, advocacy, and activities in the Centre Region

Civil Rights
5
Quad Cities Pride Alliance

The quad cities pride alliance goal is to unify and serve the lgbtq+ community, raise awareness, nurture our allys, and provide a safe place for everyone to land.

Civil Rights
6
Oklahoma City Pride Alliance Inc dba Oklahoma Pride Alliance

The Oklahoma Pride Alliance is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit focusing on the 2SLGBTQIA+ population and is committed to dismantling oppression through community empowerment, advocacy, and celebration. We center those most impacted by injustice to…

Civil Rights
7
Inreach

InReach fka AsylumConnect is a trans-led tech nonprofit dedicated to building the world's first open source verified LGBTQ+ resource platform. InReach's free platform connects LGBTQ+ people facing persecution or discrimination with a range…

Education
8
Southwest Minnesota Pride
Civil Rights
9
Iraqueer Inc

The organization spread awareness on and advocate for the rights of LGBT people in Iraq through providing training producing publications providing direct services and other activities

Human Services
10
Indiana Recovery Alliance Inc

The IRA shifts resources and power to people who use drugs. We reduce both the individual and structural harms caused by racialized drug policy through direct action and advocacy.

Health
11
Merced Lgbtq Alliance

The mission of the Merced LGBTQ+ Alliance is to advocate for the interests of the LGBTQ+ community within Merced County. We celebrate our diversity and advocate for justice and opportunities for members of our vulnerable community. We…

Education
12
Springfield Pride Parade

At the Springfield Pride Parade, we walk together in a community-driven movement of support, inclusivity, and public recognition to remind our LGBTQ+ youth that they are safe, they are loved, and they are not alone.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fort Wayne Pride Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is Interpride. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IYG INC: $161,238 · Human ServicesIYG INC+2 more: $10,600 · Human Services+2 moreFORT WAYNE PRIDE INCORPORATED: $28,350 · Civil RightsFORT WAYNE PR…INDIANA PRIDE OF COLOR: $6,000 · OtherINDY DRAG THEATER: $5,500 · OtherNORTH AMERICAN RESCUE LLC: $5,308 · OtherINTERPRIDE: $11,372 · EducationRIVER CITY PRIDE INC: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Human Services$171,838Civil Rights$28,350Other$16,808Education$11,372Arts & Culture$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIYG INC: $161,238 over 6y, 4.1% of budgetFORT WAYNE PRIDE INCORPORATED: $28,350 over 4y, 53% of budgetINTERPRIDE: $11,372 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetTHE DAMIEN CENTER: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY RESEARCH & RESOURCE CENT fka TransSolutions Rsrch & Res Ctr: $5,100 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Indianapolis Foundation IncIN13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Indy Pride Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Indy Pride Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Indy Pride’s filings →

    More from the funding graph