Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Indianapolis Urban League Inc

To assist african americans, other minorities, and disadvantaged individuals to achieve social and economic equality.

$959k
Granted FY2023
11
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$33k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202023.

Community Improvement$176kPublic Safety & Disaster$28kHuman Services$26kEducation$20kEmployment$20kYouth Development$8kFood & Nutrition$5k
02FY2023 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 11 grants below total $236,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $958,601 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $722,601 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EQUITY 1821$33,000
GREATER INDIANAPOLIS PROGRESS COMMITTEE$23,000
EDNA MARTIN CHRISTIAN CTR$20,000
BANKABLE$20,000
UNION CAMPUS$20,000
LISC$20,000
BE NIMBLE FOUNDATION$20,000
STARTUP SPRINT$20,000
SCORE INDIANAPOLIS$20,000
INDY BLACK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$20,000
THE STARTUP LADIES$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%EDNA MARTIN CHRISTIAN CTR: $20k → 16%BE NIMBLE FOUNDATION: $20k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Metro Equity Collabotrative

To provide education and resources to minority operated businesses

Education
2
Flywheel Social Enterprise Hub

Through workshops, training programs and technical assistance, we help social entrepreneurs build ventures that deliver social impact.

Philanthropy
3
Black Owned Business Excellence

Help create a more equitable entrepreneurial ecosystem in Washington State.

Community Improvement
4
Advancing Black Entrepreneurship in

Build supportive ecosystem for black-owned business to help them be successful by providing information and coaching

Civil Rights
5
Webb Squared

To redress the racial wealth gap and build generational wealth by providing incubator and accelerator services to black and brown entrepreneurs in rural North Carolina.

Community Improvement
6
Black Economic Mobility Coalition

Identify and develop talent to increase the number of sustainable Black-owned business in the Upstate

Community Improvement
7
Endeavor Louisville Inc

Endeavor Louisville is leading the high-impact entrepreneurship movement in Kentucky, Indiana and Ohio, catalyzing long-term economic growth by selecting, mentoring, and supporting the best high-impact entrepreneurs in our region.…

International
8
The Stride Center

As an innovative social enterprise, The Stride Center's mission is to empower men and women facing barriers to employment to achieve economic self-sufficiency. We provide a comprehensive career development program that includes job skills…

9
Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council

SBE Council works to promote entrepreneurship and protect small business. SBE Council advocates for entrepreneurs and stronger entrepreneurship by encouraging policies, legislative solutions and private-sector initiatives that improve the…

10
Indiana Innovation Council Inc

Promote and educate indiana residents on the state's economic success and positive gains.

11
Innovation Marquette Enterprise Corporation

Non-profit business accelerator, providing support support and services to innovators, inventors, researchers and entrepreneurs.

Community Improvement
12
Indianapolis Downtown Marketing Inc

Indianapolis Downtown Marketing, Inc. (IDMI) exists to improve downtown Indianapolis. IDMI focuses on marketing downtown businesses, destinations, organizations, activities and events.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Indiana Black Expo Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Ross Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Equity 1821 Inc — $33,000 · Community ImprovementEquity 1821 IncGREATER INDIANAPOLIS PROGRESS COMMITTEE — $23,000 · Community ImprovementGREATER INDIANAPOLIS PROGRESS COMMITTEELOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION — $20,000 · Community ImprovementLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATIONFLAGSHIP ENTERPRISE CENTER — $20,000 · Community ImprovementFLAGSHIP ENTERPRISE CENTERIndy Black Chamber of Commerce Inc — $20,000 · Community ImprovementIndy Black Chamber of Commerce IncCircle Up Indy LTD — $16,000 · Community ImprovementCircle Up Indy LTDSCORE Association — $20,000 · OtherSCORE AssociationSTARTUP SPRINT — $20,000 · OtherSTARTUP SPRINTTHE STARTUP LADIES — $20,000 · OtherTHE STARTUP LADIESUNION CAMPUS — $20,000 · OtherUNION CAMPUSBIG HOMIES OF AMERICA LLC — $10,000 · OtherBIG HOMIES OF AMERICA LLCBe Nimble Foundation Inc — $20,000 · Human ServicesBe Nimble Founda…EDNA MARTIN CHRISTIAN CENTER INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesEDNA MARTIN CHRI…Indiana Black Expo Inc — $12,500 · Civil RightsTHE ROSS FOUNDATION — $7,500 · Youth Development
Community Improvement$132,000Other$90,000Human Services$40,000Civil Rights$12,500Youth Development$7,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEquity 1821 Inc — $33,000 over 1y, 52% of budgetGREATER INDIANAPOLIS PROGRESS COMMITTEE — $23,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBe Nimble Foundation Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetFLAGSHIP ENTERPRISE CENTER — $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSCORE Association — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIndy Black Chamber of Commerce Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetEDNA MARTIN CHRISTIAN CENTER INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCircle Up Indy LTD — $16,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetIndiana Black Expo Inc — $12,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ROSS FOUNDATION — $7,500 over 1y, 6.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Urban League IncNY17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Urban League Inc · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · United Way of Central Indiana Inc · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Local Initiatives Support Corporation · Charities Aid Foundation America

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Indianapolis Urban League Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $632k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph