Skip to content
Indiana University Credit Union at a glance

· Public charity

Indiana University Credit Union

Credit union programs.

$63k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$150kPhilanthropy$108kHousing & Shelter$80kFood & Nutrition$40kCommunity Improvement$30kYouth Development$15k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$22,711
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.8B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Community Kitchen of Monroe County Inc$30,000
United Way of South Central Indiana$22,711
Hamitat for Humanity of Monroe County$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 19%. 0% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 19%Hamitat for Humanity of Monroe County: $10k → 18%Habitat for Humanity of Monroe County: $10k → 18%Monroe County Habitat for Humanity: $10k → 18%Monroe County Habitat for Humanity: $10k → 18%Habitat for Humanity of Monroe County: $10k → 18%Girl's Inc: $15k → 18%Dimension Mill: $10k → 18%Dimension Mill: $10k → 18%Dimension Mill: $10k → 18%United Way of South Central Indiana: $23k → 18%United Way of South Central Indiana: $23k → 18%United Way of Monroe County: $22k → 18%United Way of Monroe County: $20k → 18%United Way of Monroe County: $20k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$368k · 5 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +97% since the first grant, against +34% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
2

Total granted

$368k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+97%
+34%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Housing & ShelterFood & NutritionEducationPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Indiana University Foundation
    3× · 2017–2019 · $150k · revenue +97%
  • HF
    Habitat for Humanity of Monroe County
    5× · 2017–2024 · $50k · revenue +165%
  • DM
    Dimension Mill INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $30k · revenue +285%

Funded once

  • GI
    GIRLS INCORPORATED OF MONROE COUNTY
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +34%
  • HH
    HOOSIER HILLS FOOD BANK INC
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +18%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Feeding Indiana's Hungry Inc

By drawing on varied resources within public agencies and the private sector, we hope to provide hunger relief for those in need throughout Indiana.

Human Services
2
Indiana University Health Morgan Inc
—
3
Monroe County Habitat for Humanity

Our mission is to build strength, stability, and self-reliance through shelter in the monroe county community. we do this through helping homeowners with our home preservation and home ownership programs. these programs, with the help from…

—
4
House of Neighborly Service - Monroe County Il

Charitable organization formed to assist needy families in the Monroe County, IL area and provide a clearinghouse for other charitable organizations in the area.

Human Services
5
Indiana University Health Paoli Hospital Foundation Inc

Provide philanthropic support to help provide services, equipment, resources and education for indiana university health paoli, inc. ("iu health paoli") to meet the healthcare needs of our community well into the future.

—
6
Monroe County Business Development Corporation

Growing monroe county's economy by creating new and diversified job opportunities for its citizens.

—
7
Healthlinc Incorporated

Coordinate health care information by providing a community-wide clinical data and information exchange to the health care community.

—
8
Indiana University Health North Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
9
New Hope Services Inc

Provide services in response to individual need

Human Services
10
Indiana University Health Bloomington Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
11
Monroe Chamber of Commerce

The monroe chamber of commerce is the premier member-driven business league in the city of monroe. the mcc works on behalf of private-sector business and the community to develop partnerships; support prosperous conditions for business and…

—
12
Habitat for Humanity of Marion County

Seeking to put God's love into action, we bring people together to build homes, communities, and hope.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hoosier Hills Food Bank Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dimension Mill Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Indiana University Foundation: $150,000 · EducationIndiana University FoundationUNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL INDIANA: $108,143 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL …Habitat for Humanity of Monroe County: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterHabitat for Humanity …NEW HOPE FAMILY SHELTER INC: $30,000 · Housing & ShelterNEW HOPE FAMILY SHELT…COMMUNITY KITCHEN OF MONROE COUNTY INC: $30,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY …HOOSIER HILLS FOOD BANK INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionHOOSIER HI…Dimension Mill INC: $30,000 · Community ImprovementGIRLS INCORPORATED OF MONROE COUNTY: $15,000 · Other
Education$150,000Philanthropy$108,143Housing & Shelter$80,000Food & Nutrition$40,000Community Improvement$30,000Other$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIndiana University Foundation: $150,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL INDIANA: $108,143 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of Monroe County: $50,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetDimension Mill INC: $30,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetNEW HOPE FAMILY SHELTER INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY KITCHEN OF MONROE COUNTY INC: $30,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF MONROE COUNTY: $15,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetHOOSIER HILLS FOOD BANK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of South C…Community Foundation …The Smithville Charit…
United Way of South Central IndianaIN13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of South Central Indiana · Community Foundation of Bloomington and Monroe County Inc · The Smithville Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Indiana University Credit Union funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Indiana University Credit Union. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Indiana University Credit Union’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home