Skip to content
Indiana Telephone Relay Access Corp for the Hearing & Speech Impaired at a glance

· Public charity

Indiana Telephone Relay Access Corp for the Hearing & Speech Impaired

This organization was established to provide telephone relay access service to hearing and speech impaired persons residing in indiana.

$21k
Granted FY2023
2
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2023.

Health$156kHuman Services$75kEducation$45kRecreation & Sports$25kEmployment$16kYouth Development$8k
02FY2023 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$12,569
Median grant
1
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JOSEPH MALEY FOUNDATION INC$12,569
INDIANA ASSOCIATION FOR THE DEAF$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%EVERYBODY COUNTS INC: $25k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Deaf Research Institute

create, develop, and conduct deaf focus assessment and data gathering

International
2
Indiana Deaf Camps Foundation Inc

Camp for deaf & hard of hearing children

Recreation & Sports
3
National Deaf Interscholastic Athletic Association
Recreation & Sports
4
Electical Workers Indianapolis Motorcycle Group Inc
Human Services
5
Illinois Association of the Deaf

Promote deaf awareness and deaf issues in the state of illinois

—
6
Center On Deafness-Inland Empire

Social services for the deaf & hard of hearing

Human Services
7
Indiana Lions Speech & Hearing Inc

Resources to Organizations serving the deaf

Human Services
8
Deaf Services Center Inc

To empower the Deaf and Hard of Hearing people and to promote access to communication, services, and events in Central, Southern, and Northwest Ohio.

Health
9
Louisiana Association of the Deaf Inc

To advocate and promote improvement in the quality of life for deaf, deafblind, hard of hearing as well as parents thereof, interpreters, deaf professionals and children of the deaf.

—
10
Family to Family Inc dba Family Voices Indiana

Family Voices Indiana's Mission is to support families who have children and youth with health care needs and/or disabilities through eduction, outreach, and community partnerships.

—
11
Deaf Independent Living Association Inc

To promote access to the services and resources for the eastern shore residents who are deaf or hard of hearing and provide opportunities for full participation in all aspects of community life.

Human Services
12
Idd Employment Foundation
Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hear Indiana Inc; the most unlike its peers is Tradewinds Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ARCHIBALD MEMORIAL HOME INC: $25,000 · OtherARCHIBALD MEMORIAL HOME INCSILENT SENIOR HOOSIERS: $25,000 · OtherSILENT SENIOR HOOSIERSGREATER INDIANAPOLIS DEAF CLUB INC: $25,000 · OtherGREATER INDIANAPOLIS DEAF CLUB INCSHARP EYED GROUP LLC: $25,000 · OtherSHARP EYED GROUP LLCHEAR INDIANA INC: $25,000 · OtherHEAR INDIANA INCHOOSIER BLACK DEAF ADVOCATES INC: $20,000 · OtherHOOSIER BLACK DEAF ADVOCATES INCINDIANA CHAPTER OF REGISTRY OF INTERPRETERS FOR THE DEAF INC: $16,300 · OtherINDIANA CHAPTER OF REGISTRY OF INTERPRETERS FOR THE DEAF…CROSSROADS REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $50,000 · HealthCROSSROADS REHABILITATION CENTER INCLEAGUE FOR THE BLIND AND DISABLED INC: $25,000 · HealthLEAGUE FOR THE BLIND AND DISABLED IN…TRADEWINDS SERVICES INC: $18,450 · HealthTRADEWINDS SERVICES INCJOSEPH MALEY FOUNDATION INC: $12,569 · HealthJOSEPH MALEY FOUNDATION INCINDIANA DEAF CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyEVERYBODY COUNTS INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesINDIANA ASSOCIATION OF THE DEAF INC: $8,000 · Public Benefit
Other$161,300Health$106,019Philanthropy$25,000Human Services$25,000Public Benefit$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCROSSROADS REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetARCHIBALD MEMORIAL HOME INC: $25,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetINDIANA DEAF CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 82% of budgetGREATER INDIANAPOLIS DEAF CLUB INC: $25,000 over 1y, 38% of budgetHEAR INDIANA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetEVERYBODY COUNTS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetLEAGUE FOR THE BLIND AND DISABLED INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTRADEWINDS SERVICES INC: $18,450 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJOSEPH MALEY FOUNDATION INC: $12,569 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lilly Endowment IncFidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Lilly Endowment IncIN12.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lilly Endowment Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Indiana Telephone Relay Access Corp for the Hearing & Speech Impaired funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Indiana Telephone Relay Access Corp for the Hearing & Speech Impaired. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Indiana Telephone Relay Access Corp for the Hearing & Speech Impaired?

    Find your warmest path to Indiana Telephone Relay Access Corp for the Hearing & Speech Impaired through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Indiana Telephone Relay Access Corp for the Hearing & Speech Impaired’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home