Loading…
· Public charity
INDIANA PROGRESSIVE COLLABORATIVE INC
The promotion of a healthy democracy through research, engagement and education of the citizens of indiana about the positions of public officials, legislative bills, and proposed legislative action on issues related to a healthy democracy, education, the environment, economic justice, and human rights.
$233k
Granted FY2024
9
Grants
2
Communities
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0165% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2022–2024.
Public Benefit$180kCommunity Improvement$30kHealth$25kEnvironment$15kOther$137k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2022
—
2023
—
2024
voter mobilizationmobilization prioritypriority districtshealthadvocacymuslim voterhoosier
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 9 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k8 grants · $182k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$943k
Total assets
Largest grants
- HOOSIER WOMEN FORWARD$50,000
- MAD VOTERS$30,000
- IMAN ADVOCATES INC$30,000
- INDIANA MUSLIM ADVOCACY NETWORK$25,000
- THE GOOD TROUBLE COALITION$25,000
- AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION LLC$21,000
- PLANNED PARENTHOOD ADVOCATES OF INDIANA$20,000
- INDIANA TASK FORCE$16,000
- FAITH IN PLACE ACTION FUND$15,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 12%. 93% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Indiana Legal Foundation
Public Interest Legal Organization
—
2
Indiana Recovery Alliance Inc
The IRA shifts resources and power to people who use drugs. We reduce both the individual and structural harms caused by racialized drug policy through direct action and advocacy.
Health
3
University of Indianapolis
The mission of the University of Indianapolis is to prepare its graduates for effective membership in the societies in which they live and serve, and for excellence and leadership in their lives.
Education
4
Muslim Alliance of Indiana Inc
Our mission is to inspire Muslim Hoosiers to connect through service and civic engagements in their communities. Our vision is to see Muslim Hoosiers actively involved in their community, helping to build a diverse and vibrant state…
Civil Rights
5
Indiana University Alumni Association Inc
Identify and involve more than 750,000 alumni to serve indiana university and each other.
—
6
Faith in Indiana
Faith in Indiana (formerly IndyCAN) is a catalyst for faith communities and marginalized peoples to act collectively for racial and economic justice in Indiana. FaithIN develops civic leaders directly impacted by inequality, awakens the…
Human Services
7
American Association of Physicians of in
To bring together individuals and organizations of physcians, dentists, and other medical scientists of india origin practicing in the united states to conduct seminars and educational programs to acquaint
Health
8
Indiana Progressive Collaborative Inc
The promotion of a healthy democracy through research, engagement and education of the citizens of indiana about the positions of public officials, legislative bills, and proposed legislative action on issues related to a healthy…
Civil Rights
9
Indiana Democracy Collective Inc
We are building a diverse community of donors dedicated to investing in the long-term political and civic infrastructure needed to lift up all hoosiers. vision: an indiana that is a healthy, just place to live in an economy and a democracy…
Civil Rights
10
Wellness Council of Indiana Inc
The wellness council of indiana is dedicated to promoting healthier lifestyles for all citizens of indiana through health promotion activities at the worksite.
Education
11
Indiana University Foundation
To maximize private philanthropic support for Indiana University
Education
12
Indianapolis Neighborhood Housing Partnership Inc
to create affordable housing solutions for people with low and moderate incomes, and collaborate to enhance the quality of life in Indianapolis neighborhoods.
Housing & Shelter
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Planned Parenthood Advocates of Indiana and the most unlike its peers is Good Trouble Coalition Indiana Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Public Benefit$180,000Other$137,000Community Improvement$30,000Health$25,000Environment$15,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds INDIANA VOTES (AKA ACT INDIANA INC) ↗
- Who funds HOOSIER ACTION ↗
- Who funds IMAN ADVOCATES INC ↗
- Who funds INDIANA MUSLIM ADVOCACY NETWORK ↗
- Who funds THE GOOD TROUBLE COALITION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION LLC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD ADVOCATES OF INDIANA ↗
- Who funds FAITH IN PLACE ACTION FUND ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Indiana Democracy Collective IncIN18.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Indiana Democracy Collective Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation INDIANA PROGRESSIVE COLLABORATIVE INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: INDIANA MUSLIM ADVOCACY NETWORK.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
medium risk
4 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 821917427 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on INDIANA MUSLIM ADVOCACY NETWORK, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 84% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Indiana Progressive Collaborative Inc?
Find your warmest path to Indiana Progressive Collaborative Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines