· Public charity
Indiana Progressive Collaborative Inc
The promotion of a healthy democracy through research, engagement and education of the citizens of indiana about the positions of public officials, legislative bills, and proposed legislative action on issues related to a healthy democracy, education, the environment, economic justice, and human rights.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k8 grants · $182k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $50,000 |
| MAD VOTERS | $30,000 |
| IMAN ADVOCATES INC | $30,000 |
| THE GOOD TROUBLE COALITION | $25,000 |
| INDIANA MUSLIM ADVOCACY NETWORK | $25,000 |
| AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION LLC | $21,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD ADVOCATES OF INDIANA | $20,000 |
| INDIANA TASK FORCE | $16,000 |
| FAITH IN PLACE ACTION FUND | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 93% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Public Interest Legal Organization
Faith in Indiana (formerly IndyCAN) is a catalyst for faith communities and marginalized peoples to act collectively for racial and economic justice in Indiana. FaithIN develops civic leaders directly impacted by inequality, awakens the…
Our mission is to inspire Muslim Hoosiers to connect through service and civic engagements in their communities. Our vision is to see Muslim Hoosiers actively involved in their community, helping to build a diverse and vibrant state…
The promotion of a healthy democracy through research, engagement and education of the citizens of indiana about the positions of public officials, legislative bills, and proposed legislative action on issues related to a healthy…
We are building a diverse community of donors dedicated to investing in the long-term political and civic infrastructure needed to lift up all hoosiers. vision: an indiana that is a healthy, just place to live in an economy and a democracy…
The indiana justice project is a non-partisan, non-profit legal advocacy organization. we use all available legal tools to ensure equal justice and opportunity for all hoosiers. we focus on health, housing, and food insecurity.
Policy and Political Awareness
Mission is to perform research, public education and development efforts to improve the quality of life for residents of indiana.
To initiate & coordinate citizens action directed to improving the quality of life of all inhabitants of the state of indiana through principled advocacy of public policies to preserve democracy, conserve natural resources, and to protect…
Count us in is the first indiana based 501(c)(3) non-partisan non-profit and movement whose mission is to uplift the voice of citizens and fosters more inclusive and equitable political participation by encouraging a larger, more diverse…
CA/I organizes, advocates and builds coalitions to win support for progressive policies that improve the lives of all Illinoisans.
To uplift voices of hoosiers across the state and support them in the fight for a better indiana. we strive to be the communications hub for the activists who need it most, providing communities with the tools they need to organize for a…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Planned Parenthood Advocates of Indiana and Kentucky Inc and the most unlike its peers is Iman Advocates Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Act Indiana - ↗
- Who funds HOOSIER ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds IMAN Advocates Inc ↗
- Who funds Good Trouble Coalition Indiana Inc ↗
- Who funds Indiana Muslim Advocacy Network LLC ↗
- Who funds INDIANA CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD ADVOCATES OF INDIANA AND KENTUCKY INC ↗
- Who funds FAITH IN PLACE ACTION FUND ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Indiana Democracy Collective Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Indiana Progressive Collaborative Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Indiana Progressive Collaborative Inc?
Find your warmest path to Indiana Progressive Collaborative Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.