Skip to content

· Private foundation

Indian Paintbrush Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$64k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$123kHuman Services$109kHealth$100kYouth Development$100kPhilanthropy$60kEmployment$25kFood & Nutrition$15kPublic Benefit$500
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JACKSON HOLE COMMUNITY HOUSING TRUST$40,000
CITY OF PHOENIX PEDIATRIC HEALTH$10,000
NAMI$7,000
ST MARY'S FOOD BANK$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $129k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ONE22: $39k → 5%ONE22 RESOURCE CENTER: $35k → 5%ONE22 RESOURCE CENTER: $25k → 5%CLIMB WYOMING: $20k → 5%ONE22 RESOURCE CENTER: $10k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Indian Paintbrush Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 60% of the giving stays in WY; by stated purpose, 53%.

Indian Paintbrush Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$521k · 8 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
1

Total granted

$521k
$500

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+63%

Still filing today

88%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyFood & NutritionHealthPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OI
    One22 Inc
    4× · 2019–2023 · $109k · revenue +84%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE VALLEY INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $100k · revenue +14%
  • GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2023 · $60k · revenue +140%

Funded once

  • BJ
    Becoming Jackson Wholegraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $500 · revenue +63%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Scenic Montana Trails
—
2
Jackson Hole Nordic Alliance

Jackson hole nordic alliance connects people & winter trails. we are the resource hub for local nordic, fat bike, snowshoe & trail information. we help build the winter trails community & promote responsible recreation.

Recreation & Sports
3
The Jackson Hole Technology Partnership

To fuel local, regional and global tech ecosystems to shape a better future.

Science & Tech
4
Montana Meth Project

The Montana Meth Project is a large-scale prevention program aimed at reducing first-time teen methamphetamine use through public service messaging and educational outreach. Known for our media campaigns that communicate the risks of Meth…

Health
5
Mountain Pacific Quality Health Foundation

Dedicated to empowering community partners to achieve health care quality goals.

Health
6
Center for the Future of Arizona

Bringing arizonans together to create a stronger and brighter future for our state.

Community Improvement
7
Jamhi Health & Wellness Inc

We provide a comprehensive, co occurring disorder-capable, community behavioral health center. we provide quality care using best practices designed to promote health, wellness, self-determination, and recovery. the service area is the…

Health
8
Connect Summit County

To create a well-informed and stigma-free community with access to mental health services for all residents of summit county, utah.

Health
9
Evergreen Mountain Bike Alliance

Evergreen's mission is to create, maintain, and protect sustainable mountain biking opportunities in Washington State.

Environment
10
Wyoming Pathways

Wyoming Pathways mission is to inspire motivate and unite a strong community of public business and political leaders to improve people-powered transportation and recreation opportunities in Wyoming communities including bicycling walking…

Environment
11
Portland Trails

Over the next five years, portland trails will work to transform greater portland into a regional hub of connectivity and sustainability. by facilitating the expansion and enhancement of our trail network, we will foster inclusive…

Environment
12
Big Sky Sno Inc

Big sky sno is a collaborative sustainability resource hub dedicated to achieving net-zero emissions by 2050 through environmental initiatives & community action. we work closely with local businesses, community stakeholders & donors to…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Climb Dba Climb Wyoming; the most unlike its peers is Grand Teton National Park Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JACKSON HOLE COMMUNITY HOUSING TRUST: $122,500 · OtherJACKSON HOLE COMMUNITY HOUSING TRUSTBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE VALLEY INC: $100,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE VALLEY INCTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $75,000 · OtherTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION+1 more: $10,000 · OtherOne22 Inc: $108,622 · Human ServicesOne22 IncCLIMB DBA CLIMB WYOMING: $25,000 · Human ServicesCLIMB DBA CLIMB WYOMINGGRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $60,000 · PhilanthropyGRAND TETON …ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $15,000 · Food & NutritionNAMI National: $15,000 · HealthBecoming Jackson Whole: $500 · Public Benefit
Other$307,500Human Services$133,622Philanthropy$60,000Food & Nutrition$15,000Health$15,000Public Benefit$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJACKSON HOLE COMMUNITY HOUSING TRUST: $122,500 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetOne22 Inc: $108,622 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE VALLEY INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCLIMB DBA CLIMB WYOMING: $25,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI National: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBecoming Jackson Whole: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Indian Paintbrush Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Indian Paintbrush Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Indian Paintbrush’s filings →

    More from the funding graph