Skip to content
Independent Group Home Living Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Independent Group Home Living Foundation Inc

The foundation's primary exempt mission is to raise funds through a planned giving program and the holding of special events for the benefit of independent group home living program, inc.

$336k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$191k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$490kEducation$216kHealth$47kEmployment$37kCrime & Legal$31kArts & Culture$6k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $302,925, the rows itemized in this filing. The $335,675 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $32,750 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $31k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $272k
$80,415
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE NEW INTERDISCIPLINARY SCHOOL$191,295
INDEPENDENT GROUP HOME LIVING PROGRAM INC$80,415
KINEXION INC$31,215
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $505k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 5%independent group home living program inc: $133k → 7%INDEPENDENT GROUP HOME LIVING PROGRAM INC: $80k → 7%independent group home living program inc: $68k → 7%Independent Group Home Living Program Inc: $63k → 7%Independent Group Home Living Program Inc: $52k → 7%Independent Group Home Living Program Inc: $40k → 7%INDEPENDENT GROUP HOME LIVING PROGRAM INC: $30k → 7%INDEPENDENT GROUP HOME LIVING PROGRAM INC: $25k → 7%The Center for Developmental Disabilities Inc: $16k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$551k · 3 repeat orgs$275k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +69% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
3

Total granted

$551k
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+69%
+37%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 27% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $223k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    INDEPENDENT GROUP HOME LIVING PROGRAM INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $490k · revenue +34%
  • SF
    SMILE FARMS INC
    4× · 2018–2023 · $37k · revenue +133%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF NIS INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $25k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • VI
    VICTIMS INFORMATION BUREAU OF SUFFOLKgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $31k · revenue +73%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIESgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $16k · revenue +37%
  • VO
    VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS DEPARTMENT
    one grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue -27%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
East End Disability Associates Inc

The agency's motto and mission statement is "creating opportunities for happy lives: dedicated to creating practical solutions and provide innovative supports to people with intellectual and developmental disabilities on the east end of…

Human Services
2
Individual Advocacy Group Inc

Iag's mission is to aid & provide customized services to both children and adults with disabilities, and their families, to live normal lives in the community, to remain in a community home, live independently and actively participate in…

Civil Rights
3
Tiegerman Community Services Inc

Tiegerman community services, inc. (tcs) offers adults with developmental disabilities a supportive and nurturing environment that promotes a lifetime of personal growth, learning and self-esteem. the program is designed to assist…

Human Services
4
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
5
Kjr Holding Inc

Kjr holding, inc. is a real estate holding company that owns real estate properties for the benefit of its parent organization, independent group home living program, inc., and its related non-profit organizations.

—
6
New York Institute for Special Education

The mission of the new york institute for special education is to provide quality educational programs and support to students and families in a safe caring environment to awaken and inspire student curiosity, lifelong learning and…

Education
7
Association for Technology Dependent Children Inc

To identify families caring for their children who may have a severe disability or medical condition so that we may help them obtain supportive services to improve the quality of life for the children and their family. these children have…

Human Services
8
Kennedy Krieger Children's Hospital Inc

Kennedy krieger children's hospital (kkch) offers clinical programs to meet the specialized needs of children and adolescents with developmental disabilities. more than 35 different outpatient programs and four inpatient units address the…

Health
9
Independent Group Home Living Foundation Inc

The foundation's primary exempt mission is to raise funds through a planned giving program and the holding of special events for the benefit of independent group home living program, inc. and its affiliated not-for profit organizations.

Philanthropy
10
Empire State Employment Resources for the Blind Inc

Creating employment opportunities and upward mobility for new yorkers who are blind.

Human Services
11
Nysarc Inc New York City Chapter

We are committed to helping people with intellectual (cont. on schedule o) and developmental disabilities to live full lives.

Human Services
12
The Summit Center Inc

The summit center, inc. is a private, not-for-profit organization approved by new york state to provide educational, therapeutic, and support services to children and young adults with autism, speech delays and disorders, and other…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kinexion Inc; the most unlike its peers is Veterans of Foreign Wars Department. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INDEPENDENT GROUP HOME LIVING PROGRAM INC: $489,587 · Human ServicesINDEPENDENT GROUP HOME LIVING PROGRAM INC+1 more: $15,500 · Human ServicesTHE NEW INTERDISCIPLINARY SCHOOL: $191,295 · OtherTHE NEW INTERDISCIPLINARY SCHOOLVICTIMS INFORMATION BUREAU OF SUFFOLK: $31,095 · OtherVICTIMS INFORMATION BUREAU OF SUFF…FRIENDS OF NIS INC: $25,010 · OtherFRIENDS OF NIS INC+1 more: $5,900 · OtherSMILE FARMS INC: $36,500 · EmploymentKINEXION INC: $31,215 · Health
Human Services$505,087Other$253,300Employment$36,500Health$31,215

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINDEPENDENT GROUP HOME LIVING PROGRAM INC: $489,587 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NEW INTERDISCIPLINARY SCHOOL: $191,295 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSMILE FARMS INC: $36,500 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetKINEXION INC: $31,215 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVICTIMS INFORMATION BUREAU OF SUFFOLK: $31,095 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF NIS INC: $25,010 over 2y, 16% of budgetCENTER FOR DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES: $15,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS DEPARTMENT: $5,900 over 1y, 2.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Independent Group Home Living Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Independent Group Home Living Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Independent Group Home Living’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home