Skip to content

· Public charity

Impact 100 Srq Inc

To empower women to fund transformational grants to nonprofits in sarasota and manatee counties

$632k
Granted FY2023
8
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$111k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2023.

Human Services$524kHealth$326kYouth Development$130kEnvironment$116kFood & Nutrition$114kEducation$111kArts & Culture$90k
02FY2023 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $44k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $587k
$93,965
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SPARCC INC$110,500
BOOKER PROMISE FDN INC$110,500
HOPE FAMILY SERVICES$101,000
RESILIENT RETREAT$93,965
FL W Coast Sympnhony$90,430
SNR FRIENDSHIP CTR INC$80,899
DREAMER ACADEMY INC$28,740
CONSERVATION FDN OF THE GC$15,491
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $114k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE HAVEN: $114k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 50% of Impact 100 Srq Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 93% of the giving stays in FL; by stated purpose, 48%.

Impact 100 Srq Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

31%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$443k · 4 repeat orgs$968k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +132% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
4

Total granted

$443k
$430k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+132%
+28%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 15% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $538k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23
HealthArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YMCA OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $114k · revenue +132%
  • CC
    CHILDREN'S CANCER CENTER INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $114k · revenue +163%
  • MF
    MAYORS FEED THE HUNGRY PROGRAM INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $114k · revenue -24%

Funded once

  • MOTHERS HELPING MOTHERS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $114k · revenue +28%
  • Community Haven For Adults And Children With Disabilities Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $114k · revenue +61%
  • GI
    GIRLS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $101k · revenue +27%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Manatee Children's Services Inc

Preventing child abuse, restoring healing, and strengthening all children and their families through advocacy, treatment, and shelter.

Crime & Legal
2
Safe Children Coalition Inc

The safe children coalition's mission is to protect children and youth, strengthen families, and build community.

Human Services
3
Child Protection Center Inc

The mission of the child protection center, inc. is the prevention, intervention and treatment of child abuse. we envision a community where children are safe from abuse and free to thrive. to successfully address the issue of child abuse,…

Crime & Legal
4
Women's Resource Center of Sarasota Inc

The center is dedicated to improving and maintaining the quality of life for all women of sarasota county by providing an environment that fosters the open exchange of ideas and ideals and providing the suppport for the attainment of…

—
5
The Florida Center for Early Childhood Inc

The florida center supports the healthy development of young children, specializing in those with delays, disabilities or mental health challenges. our mission- "to help build and foster strong families and expand the potential of young…

Human Services
6
Child Advocacy Center Inc

A comprehensive, child-friendly facility where professionals from law enforcement, medical, child protection and therapeutic services collaborate to meet the individual needs of child victims and break the cycle of abuse.

Crime & Legal
7
Heart Gallery of Sarasota
—
8
Santa Rosa Kids' House Inc

To deliver a well coordinated and multi-disciplined response to child abuse in an environment that puts children first

Youth Development
9
Sarasota Academy of the Arts Inc

The mission of sarasota academy of the arts (saa) is to provide a motivating, challenging, and creative learning climate with a safe, caring, family atmosphere. saa will provide students interested in visual and performing arts with…

Education
10
Sarasota Medical Pregnancy Center Inc

To offer cost free medical services, behavioral and social services and general resources that can benefit the mother or father from pre-birth to post-birth. from the pregnancy test to the baby's first birthday we provide support,…

Health
11
Forty Carrots of Sarasota Inc

Forty carrots family center's mission is to nurture healthy child and family development through research-based, relationship-centered education and mental health services.

—
12
Realtor Association of Sarasota and Manatee Inc

The mission of the realtor association of sarasota and manatee is to advance members' professionalism through delivery of education and resources, and to advocate for real estate in the communities served.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Teen Court of Sarasota Inc; the most unlike its peers is Booker Promise Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
13/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILDREN'S CANCER CENTER INC: $114,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S CANCER CENTER I…Safe Place and Rape Crisis Center Inc: $110,500 · HealthSafe Place and Rape Crisis…RESILIENT RETREAT INC: $101,000 · HealthRESILIENT RETREAT INCYMCA OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $114,000 · OtherYMCA OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INCHope Family Services Inc: $101,000 · OtherHope Family Services IncSENIOR FRIENDSHIP CENTERS INC: $80,899 · OtherSENIOR FRIENDSHIP CENTERS INCBOOKER PROMISE FOUNDATION INC: $110,500 · OtherBOOKER PROMISE FOUNDATION INCBig Waters Land Trust Inc: $15,491 · OtherCROWLEY MUSEUM AND NATURE CENTER INC: $101,000 · Arts & CultureCROWLEY MUSEUM …Florida West Coast Symphony Inc dba Sarasota Orchestra: $90,430 · Arts & CultureFlorida West Co…GIRLS INC: $101,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS INCDREAMERS ACADEMY INC: $28,740 · Youth DevelopmentDREAMERS A…MOTHERS HELPING MOTHERS INC: $114,000 · Community ImprovementMOTHERS H…Community Haven For Adults And Children With Disabilities Inc: $114,000 · Human ServicesCommunity…MAYORS FEED THE HUNGRY PROGRAM INC: $114,000 · Food & NutritionMAYORS FE…
Health$325,500Other$421,890Arts & Culture$191,430Youth Development$129,740Community Improvement$114,000Human Services$114,000Food & Nutrition$114,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYMCA OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $114,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMOTHERS HELPING MOTHERS INC: $114,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER CENTER INC: $114,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetCommunity Haven For Adults And Children With Disabilities Inc: $114,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetMAYORS FEED THE HUNGRY PROGRAM INC: $114,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetBOOKER PROMISE FOUNDATION INC: $110,500 over 1y, 25% of budgetSafe Place and Rape Crisis Center Inc: $110,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetGIRLS INC: $101,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRESILIENT RETREAT INC: $101,000 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetHope Family Services Inc: $101,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetCROWLEY MUSEUM AND NATURE CENTER INC: $101,000 over 1y, 59% of budgetFlorida West Coast Symphony Inc dba Sarasota Orchestra: $90,430 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSENIOR FRIENDSHIP CENTERS INC: $80,899 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetDREAMERS ACADEMY INC: $28,740 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetBig Waters Land Trust Inc: $15,491 over 2y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co IncFL43.1× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co Inc · Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · William G and Marie Selby Foundation Inc · Manatee Community Foundation Inc · The Louis and Gloria Flanzer Philanthropic Trust · Charles & Margery Barancik Foundation Inc · Msc Foundation Inc · United Way Suncoast Inc · Junior League of Sarasota Inc · Wilson - Wood Foundation Inc · Sisterhood For Good Inc · The Mary Parker Foundation 157823-000

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Impact 100 Srq Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Impact 100 Srq Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 23%
  • Hope Family Services Inc: 40% of income from government
  • Safe Place and Rape Crisis Center Inc: 23% of income from government
  • Florida West Coast Symphony Inc dba Sarasota Orchestra: 0% of income from government
  • Resilient Retreat Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Impact 100 Srq Inc?

Find your warmest path to Impact 100 Srq Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $617k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Impact 100 Srq’s filings →

More from the funding graph