Skip to content

· Public charity

Impact 100 NYC Inc

By harnessing the power of collective giving and collaborative action, impact 100 nyc unites women across the five boroughs to fund transformative giving that helps the people and communities of nyc.

$422k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$105k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Human Services$324kEnvironment$162kCommunity Improvement$143kYouth Development$112kEmployment$107kHousing & Shelter$9kFood & Nutrition$7k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $415k
$105,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$617k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NIDO DE ESPERANAZA$105,000
CITY LIVING NY$105,000
KAVI$105,000
SURE WE CAN$50,000
HARLEM GROWN$50,000
GIRL VOW$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $331k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%CITY LIVING NY: $105k → 17%YOU GOTTA BELIEVE: $107k → 20%TEENS FOR FOOD JUSTICE: $7k → 17%NIDO DE ESPERANAZA: $105k → 17%DAY ONE: $7k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Youth Represent Inc

Youth represent uses legal services, policy advocacy, peer education, and other tools to build power and opportunity for black, latine, and other youth of color who the criminal legal system and other systems of oppression harm the most.…

Crime & Legal
2
New York State Youth Leadership Council Inc

New York State Youth Leadership Council, Inc. (NYSYLC or the Organization) works to empower immigrant youth through leadership development, grassroots organizing, educational advancement, and self-expression. NYSYLCs goal is to give…

Human Services
3
Do for One Nyc

To serve people with developmental disabilities

Human Services
4
Friends of the Children- New York

Friends of the children - new york has a mission of impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships with professional mentors - 12+ years, no matter what. 92% go on to enroll in…

Crime & Legal
5
Digital Girl Incorporated

Digital Girl, Inc. (DGI) is a non-profit organization dedicated to empowering the underserved youth of New York City, especially young girls, to pursue studies and careers in STEM ( Science, Technology, Engineering and Math) disciplines.

Education
6
Families Together in New York State Inc

Establish a unified voice for children and youth with emotional, behavioral, and social challenges. the organizational mission is to ensure that every family has access to needed information, support, and services.

Human Services
7
Faith in New York

The mission of Faith in New York is to equip congregations and develop grassroots leaders to move significant public policy change that supports our leaders vision of a more just New York City with excellent public schools, violence-free…

Religion
8
Careerwise New York Inc

Careerwise new york's mission is to forge pathways to meaningful careers through bold advocacy, innovative apprenticeships, and industry led partnerships, creating a dynamic talent ecosystem that connects ambition to opportunity for…

Education
9
Children in Conflict Inc

Vision: a world where no child's life is torn apart by war.children in conflict works tirelessly to restore hope, safety and childhoods to children whose lives are affected by war.

Human Services
10
New Yorkers Against Gun Violence Education Fund Inc

To inform the public, particularly youth, about the dangers of gun violence and ways to prevent and reduce gun violence. the organization works through community-based workshops and the reaction youth project to increase awareness in…

Arts & Culture
11
The Hope Program Inc

The hope program empowers new yorkers to build sustainable futures through training, jobs and career advancement.

Employment
12
Resources for Children With Special Needs Inc

Includenyc fosters positive futures and enhances the quality of life for new york city children and youth with disabilities, ages birth through 26, and their families. (continued on schedule o)includenyc empowers families of children and…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is City Living Ny Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sure We Can Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YOU GOTTA BELIEVE - THE OLDER CHILD ADOPTION & PERMANENCY MOVEMENT INC: $107,000 · Human ServicesYOU GOTTA BELIEVE - THE OLDER CHILD ADOPTIO…CITY LIVING NY INC: $105,000 · Human ServicesCITY LIVING NY INCNIDO DE ESPERANZA CHARITABLE SOCIETY: $105,000 · Human ServicesNIDO DE ESPERANZA CHARITABLE SOCIETY+2 more: $14,000 · Human ServicesHARLEM GROWN INC: $162,000 · EnvironmentHARLEM GROWN INCSure We Can Inc: $112,000 · EnvironmentSure We Can IncKings Against Violence Initiative Inc: $105,000 · Youth DevelopmentKings Against Vi…LATINAS ON THE VERGE OF EXCELLENCE- LOVE INC: $15,500 · Youth DevelopmentLATINAS ON THE V…GIRL VOW INC: $7,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL VOW INCFUTURES AND OPTIONS INC: $107,000 · EducationFUTURES AND OP…PROJECTART: $15,500 · OtherXAVIER MISSION INC: $9,000 · Housing & Shelter
Human Services$331,000Environment$274,000Youth Development$127,500Education$107,000Other$15,500Housing & Shelter$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHARLEM GROWN INC: $162,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetSure We Can Inc: $112,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetYOU GOTTA BELIEVE - THE OLDER CHILD ADOPTION & PERMANENCY MOVEMENT INC: $107,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetFUTURES AND OPTIONS INC: $107,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetCITY LIVING NY INC: $105,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetNIDO DE ESPERANZA CHARITABLE SOCIETY: $105,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetLATINAS ON THE VERGE OF EXCELLENCE- LOVE INC: $15,500 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetXAVIER MISSION INC: $9,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTEENS FOR FOOD JUSTICE INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDay One of New York Inc: $7,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGIRL VOW INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pinkerton FoundationNY21.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pinkerton Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Robin Hood Foundation · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · Brooklyn Community Foundation · The New York Community Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Impact 100 NYC Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Impact 100 NYC Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Impact 100 NYC Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Impact 100 NYC Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Impact 100 NYC’s filings →

    More from the funding graph