Loading…
· Public charity
IMAGINE SCHOOLS NON-PROFIT INC
Imagine schools non-profit's vision is for every child to reach his or her full potential and discover pathways for life-long success.
$2.5M
Granted FY2023
4
Grants
1
Communities
$935k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2023.
Education$13M
02FY2023 · 4 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- $50k–250k1 grant · $101k
- $250k+3 grants · $2.4M
$831,010
Median grant
1
States reached
$159M
Total assets
Largest grants
- IMAGINE PREP SURPRISE INC$935,000
- IMAGINE SUPERSTITION INC$831,010
- IMAGINE COOLIDGE ELEMENTARY INC$631,527
- IMAGINE CAMELBACK INC$100,658
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 9%. 100% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$13M · 9 repeat orgs$101k to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2023, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
9
1
Total granted
$13M
$101k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+41%
+36%
Still filing today
100%
100%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $101k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ICIMAGINE COOLIDGE ELEMENTARY INC5× · 2018–2023 · $3.7M · revenue +43%
- IPIMAGINE PREP SURPRISE INC5× · 2019–2023 · $3.2M · revenue +41%
- IPIMAGINE PREP COOLIDGE INC5× · 2018–2022 · $3.1M · revenue +46% · 36% of their budget
Funded once
- ICIMAGINE CAMELBACK INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $101k · revenue +36%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Imagine Charter Elementary At
To operate a not for profit charter school and conduct educational research, evaluation, and development activities.
Education
2
Imagine Middle At East Mesa Inc
To operate a not for profit charter school and conduct educational research, evaluation, and development activities.
Education
3
Imagine Middle At Surprise Inc
To operate a not for profit charter school and conduct educational research, evaluation, and development activities.
Education
4
West Gilbert Charter Elementary
To operate a not for profit charter school and conduct educational research, evaluation, and development activities.
Education
5
East Mesa Charter Elementary School
To operate a not for profit charter school and conduct educational research, evaluation, and development activities.
Education
6
Imagine - South Broward Inc
To operate a charter school serving grades k-8 and after care for charter school students, in broward county, florida.
Education
7
Imagine At Broward Inc
Education
8
Imagine Schools Inc
Imagine schools inc.'s vision is for every child to reach his or her full potential and discover pathways for life-long success. as a national family of public charter school campuses, imagine schools inc.'s mission is to partner with…
Education
9
Invest Collegiate Imagine Inc
Operation of a public charter school, serving grades k-12, in ashveille, nc
Education
10
Imagine School At North Port Inc
To provide charitable and educational services through the operation of one or more charter schools within the state of florida.
Education
11
Christ Church School Inc
To provide private pre-school and elementary school education
Education
12
Learning Excellence Foundation of West Broward County Inc
To provide outstanding education services to kindergarten through eighth grade students of west borward county, florida as a charter school.
Education
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Imagine Charter Elementary At and the most unlike its peers is Imagine Camelback Middle Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network
10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2018–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
10/10
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Education$13,372,854
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds IMAGINE COOLIDGE ELEMENTARY INC ↗
- Who funds IMAGINE PREP SURPRISE INC ↗
- Who funds IMAGINE PREP COOLIDGE INC ↗
- Who funds IMAGINE SUPERSTITION INC ↗
- Who funds IMAGINE SUPERSTITION MIDDLE INC ↗
- Who funds IMAGINE CAMELBACK MIDDLE INC ↗
- Who funds IMAGINE AVONDALE ELEMENTARY INC ↗
- Who funds IMAGINE DESERT WEST MIDDLE INC ↗
- Who funds IMAGINE AVONDALE MIDDLE INC ↗
- Who funds IMAGINE CAMELBACK INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Wonderful FoundationsMN13.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Wonderful Foundations · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation IMAGINE SCHOOLS NON-PROFIT INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: IMAGINE PREP COOLIDGE INC.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
high risk
~1 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 452529766 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on IMAGINE PREP COOLIDGE INC, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 36% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Imagine Schools Non-Profit Inc?
Find your warmest path to Imagine Schools Non-Profit Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines