Skip to content

· Private foundation

Imaginable Futures Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$22M
Granted FY2024still arriving
63
Grants FY2024still arriving
14
States reached
$1.5M
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Education$27MHuman Services$9.7MInternational$7.8MSocial Science$4.4MHealth$3.8MCommunity Improvement$3.0MScience & Tech$1.3MPublic Benefit$968kOther$0
02FY2024 · 63 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k20 grants · $3.2M
  • $250k+30 grants · $19M
$200,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$52M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Alliance for Early Success$1,500,000
All Our Kin Inc$1,500,000
National Black Child Development Institute Inc$1,500,000
Fundo Socioambiental Casa$1,365,000
Firelight Foundation$1,202,000
The Aspen Institute Inc$1,166,667
Generation Hope$850,000
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill$750,000
Firelight Foundation$602,000
The Wildflower Foundation$600,000
Individual grant recipient$500,000
PelotonU Inc$500,000
Association of Community College Trustees$500,000
President and Fellows of Harvard College$500,000
Individual grant recipient$500,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 69% of grant dollars ($46M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 31% that went abroad ($20M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $4.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 51% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%National Black Child Development Institute Inc: $1.5M → 8%Centering Healthcare Institute Inc: $600k → 16%National Black Child Development Institute (NBCDI): $500k → 8%FAMILY AND YOUTH INITIATIVE INC: $3k → 14%Family and Youth Initative INC: $3k → 14%Alliance for Early Success: $750k → 14%Alliance for Early Success: $750k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
MN
NY
MA
OH
PA
CT
CA
CO
NE
VA
MD
NC
SC
DC
HI
LA
AL
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 31% of all-years giving ($20M)

5 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Brazil$9.0M · 42 grants
Kenya$5.3M · 20 grants
South Africa$5.2M · 14 grants
United Kingdom$466k · 3 grants
Mexico$300k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Imaginable Futures Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Imaginable Futures Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 33% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$47M · 46 repeat orgs$16M to everyone else

46 repeat relationships: 29 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
40

Total granted

$47M
$11M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+17%

Still filing today

59%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
EducationInternationalHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureSocial ScienceOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $3.5M · revenue +134%
  • AF
    ALLIANCE FOR EARLY SUCCESS FKA BIRTH TO FIVE POLICY ALLIANCE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $3.0M · revenue +3%
  • GH
    GENERATION HOPE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $2.5M · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • The Education Trust Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $1.4M · revenue +0%
  • NEW AMERICA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $800k · revenue -20%
  • IW
    IMAGINE WORLDWIDEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $750k · revenue +338%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
Aacsb International - the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business

Aacsb international provides quality assurance of business school programs, the latest in business education intelligence, thought leadership, and learning and development services.

Education
4
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
5
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
6
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
7
Global Ties Us

Global ties u.s. (global ties) powers individuals, communities, and nations to build trust and advance peace and prosperity through international exchange.

International
8
National Association of Independent Schools Inc

As the largest association of independent schools, nais co-creates the future of education by uniting and empowering our community. we do this through thought leadership, research, creation and curation of resources, and direct…

—
9
AI4ALL

Ai4all's mission is to ensure that the next generation of ai leaders reflects humanity. ai4all is transforming the pipeline of ai practitioners who will shape ai for the benefit of humanity.

Youth Development
10
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
11
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
12
American Association of State Colleges and Universities

Aascu is a washington, d.c. based higher education association that represents the sector of over 500 regional public colleges, universities, and systems whose members share a learning and teaching centered culture, a commitment to…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Teach for All Inc; the most unlike its peers is The 5 Gyres Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

68 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 68 of the 117 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
67/68
Grantees still filing
39/68
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SmartStart Early Learning (RF) NPC: $1,950,000 · OtherSmartStart Early Learning (RF) NPCFundo Socioambiental Casa: $1,865,000 · OtherFundo Socioambiental CasaZizi Afrique Foundation: $1,510,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,400,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $1,200,000 · OtherMaharishi Invincibility Institute-NPC: $1,150,000 · OtherInnovation Edge Foundation (RF) NPC: $1,017,000 · OtherLIFT INC: $1,000,000 · Other+71 more: $18,697,300 · Other+71 moreALL OUR KIN INC: $3,075,000 · EducationALL OUR KIN INCGENERATION HOPE: $2,450,000 · EducationGENERATION HOPEPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $2,000,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harva…THE WILDFLOWER FOUNDATION: $2,000,000 · EducationTHE WILDFLOWER FOUNDATIONTEACH FOR ALL INC: $1,500,000 · EducationTEACH FOR ALL INCThe Education Trust Inc: $1,400,000 · EducationThe Education Trust IncPELOTONU INC: $1,250,000 · EducationPELOTONU INCSHINING HOPE FOR COMMUNITIES INC: $800,000 · EducationAMERICAN COUNCIL ON EDUCATION: $800,000 · EducationTeachers College Columbia University: $625,000 · Education+9 more: $2,137,500 · Education+9 moreALLIANCE FOR EARLY SUCCESS FKA BIRTH TO FIVE POLICY ALLIANCE: $3,000,000 · Human ServicesALLIANCE …NATIONAL BLACK CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE: $2,000,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL …CENTERING HEALTHCARE INSTITUTE INC: $600,000 · Human ServicesCENTERING…+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesFIRELIGHT FOUNDATION: $2,962,794 · InternationalEducate: $1,200,000 · InternationalBRAZIL FOUNDATION: $518,175 · InternationalMYRIAD USA INC: $350,000 · International+2 more: $152,500 · InternationalTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $3,500,000 · Social ScienceTHE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION: $450,000 · Social ScienceTHE URBAN INSTITUTE: $175,000 · Social ScienceTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC: $1,255,000 · Community ImprovementIMAGINE WORLDWIDE: $750,000 · Community ImprovementUBONGO INTERNATIONAL: $550,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC: $475,000 · Arts & CultureGLOBAL FUND FOR CHILDREN: $200,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $2,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$29,789,300Education$18,037,500Human Services$5,605,000International$5,183,469Social Science$4,125,000Community Improvement$2,005,000Arts & Culture$1,227,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $3,500,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetALL OUR KIN INC: $3,075,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetALLIANCE FOR EARLY SUCCESS FKA BIRTH TO FIVE POLICY ALLIANCE: $3,000,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetFIRELIGHT FOUNDATION: $2,962,794 over 3y, 72% of budgetGENERATION HOPE: $2,450,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $2,000,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILDFLOWER FOUNDATION: $2,000,000 over 3y, 7.2% of budgetNATIONAL BLACK CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE: $2,000,000 over 2y, 24% of budgetTEACH FOR ALL INC: $1,500,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetThe Education Trust Inc: $1,400,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC: $1,255,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetPELOTONU INC: $1,250,000 over 3y, 28% of budgetEducate: $1,200,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetLIFT INC: $1,000,000 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetNEW AMERICA FOUNDATION: $800,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetSHINING HOPE FOR COMMUNITIES INC: $800,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetAMERICAN COUNCIL ON EDUCATION: $800,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetIMAGINE WORLDWIDE: $750,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $725,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTH FEDERATION OF PHILADELPHIA INC: $675,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTeachers College Columbia University: $625,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCENTERING HEALTHCARE INSTITUTE INC: $600,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetCAPITA SOCIAL INC: $600,000 over 1y, 62% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $600,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUBONGO INTERNATIONAL: $550,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetBRAZIL FOUNDATION: $518,175 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetTHINK EQUAL USA INC: $500,000 over 2y, 30% of budgetKHAN ACADEMY INC: $500,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY COLLEGE TRUSTEES: $500,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetTHE VIRGINIA FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATION INC: $475,000 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC: $475,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJEREMIAH PROGRAM: $450,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetTHE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION: $450,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetEARLY LEARNING ACCESS INC: $425,000 over 2y, 52% of budgetMYRIAD USA INC: $350,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE MALALA FUND: $300,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER: $300,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetAmalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc: $250,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR CHILDREN: $200,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetBELIEVE IN STUDENTS INC: $190,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetTHE URBAN INSTITUTE: $175,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLatin American Leadership Foundation Inc: $165,000 over 2y, 7.6% of budgetPATH: $150,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW STORIES: $130,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetINTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION: $125,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $120,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law: $100,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR WOMEN'S POLICY RESEARCH: $100,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds ALL OUR KIN INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR EARLY SUCCESS FKA BIRTH TO FIVE POLICY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds FIRELIGHT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GENERATION HOPE ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds THE WILDFLOWER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL BLACK CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds TEACH FOR ALL INC ↗
  • Who funds The Education Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds PELOTONU INC ↗
  • Who funds Educate ↗
  • Who funds LIFT INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW AMERICA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SHINING HOPE FOR COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN COUNCIL ON EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds IMAGINE WORLDWIDE ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH FEDERATION OF PHILADELPHIA INC ↗
  • Who funds Teachers College Columbia University ↗
  • Who funds CENTERING HEALTHCARE INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds CAPITA SOCIAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UBONGO INTERNATIONAL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Omidyar Network Fund IncCA40.4× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Omidyar Network Fund Inc · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · WK Kellogg Foundation · Gates Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Ecmc Foundation · Tides Foundation · The Efrusy Family Foundation · Valhalla Foundation · Buffett Early Childhood Fund · The Burke Foundation Inc · Bainum Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Imaginable Futures Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Imaginable Futures Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Third Sector New England Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College: 3% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Clubs of Boston Inc: 2% of income from government
  • All Our Kin Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Imaginable Futures Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Imaginable Futures Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 117 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Imaginable Futures’ filings →

More from the funding graph