Skip to content

· Public charity

Illinois Corn Marketing Board

To provide research, market development and efficient markets for illinois corn and corn products.

$905k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$15MScience & Tech$2.5MEducation$1.5MHealth$1.3MEnvironment$1.1M
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $340k
  • $250k+1 grant · $500k
$65,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ILLINOIS CORN GROWERS ASSN$500,000
SIUE-NAT'L CORN TO ETHANOL RESEARCH$100,000
AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION$65,000
PURDUE UNIVERSITY$65,000
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION$60,000
BLUESTEM BIOSCIENCES$50,000
CLEAN FUELS DEVELOPMENT COALITION$35,000
HIGHLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $100k → 10%US GRAINS COUNCIL: $1.1M → 14%NATIONAL CORN GROWERS ASSOCIATION: $1.5M → 11%USA POULTRY & EGG EXPORT COUNCIL: $304k → 14%US MEAT EXPORT FEDERATION: $395k → 12%CLEARFLAME TECHNOLOGIES: $75k → 8%ILLINOIS FARM FAMILIES: $113k → 11%SIUE-NAT'L CORN TO ETHANOL RESEARCH: $257k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION: $205k → 19%CLEAN FUELS DEVELOPMENT COALITION: $95k → 8%US GRAINS COUNCIL: $850k → 14%NATIONAL CORN GROWERS ASSOCIATION: $413k → 11%USA POULTRY & EGG EXPORT COUNCIL: $294k → 14%US MEAT EXPORT FEDERATION: $365k → 12%IAA FOUNDATION: $90k → 11%SIUE-NAT'L CORN TO ETHANOL RESEARCH: $200k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION: $199k → 19%US GRAIN COUNCIL: $700k → 14%US POULTRY & EGG EXPORT COUNCIL: $260k → 14%US MEAT EXPORT FEDERATION: $325k → 12%IAA FOUNDATION: $90k → 11%SIUE-NAT'L CORN TO ETHANOL RESEARCH: $193k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION: $180k → 19%US GRAIN COUNCIL: $362k → 14%IAA FOUNDATION: $90k → 11%NATIONAL CORN TO ETHANOL RESEARCH: $166k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION: $180k → 19%IAA FOUNDATION: $90k → 11%SIUE-NAT'L CORN TO ETHANOL RESEARCH: $150k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION: $120k → 19%IAA FOUNDATION: $90k → 11%SIUE-NAT'L CORN TO ETHANOL RESEARCH: $133k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION: $120k → 19%ILLINOIS BEEF ASSOCIATION: $110k → 11%HEARTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDAT: $150k → 11%SIUE-NAT'L CORN TO ETHANOL RESEARCH: $100k → 12%AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $416k → 11%AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $180k → 11%ZEA MAYS: $160k → 11%AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $155k → 11%ZEA MAYS: $160k → 11%AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $145k → 11%ZEA MAYS: $150k → 11%AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $100k → 11%AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $80k → 11%AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $75k → 11%ILLINOIS PORK PRODUCERS ASSN: $130k → 11%ILLINOIS PORK PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION: $130k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
IA
IN
CO
NE
MO
MD
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$20M · 20 repeat orgs$823k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
7

Total granted

$20M
$823k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+20%

Still filing today

65%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionCommunity ImprovementHealthYouth DevelopmentPublic BenefitEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IC
    ILLINOIS CORN GROWERS ASSOCIATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $6.5M · revenue +361% · 51% of their budget
  • UG
    US GRAINS COUNCIL
    5× · 2017–2021 · $3.0M · revenue +42%
  • University of Illinois Foundation
    8× · 2018–2025 · $2.4M · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • GE
    GROWTH ENERGY
    one grant, 2017 · $380k · revenue +11%
  • HC
    HEARTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $150k · revenue +75%
  • IA
    Illinois Agricultural Association
    one grant, 2017 · $113k · revenue +20%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Missouri Corn Growers Association

The Missouri Corn Growers Association is a grassroots organization directed by its members dedicated to increasing the profitability of corn production by developing and expanding corn markets; collecting and distributing information;…

—
2
Iowa Corn Grower's Association

The iowa corn growers association (icga) is a membership organization lobbying to protect the rights of its more than 7,000 corn farmer members. icga serves as the collective voice for iowa corn farmers, lobbying on agricultural issues at…

—
3
Illinois Association of Future Farmers of America

FFA makes a positive difference in the lives of students by developing their potential for premier leadership, personal growth and career success, developing a competent and assertive agricultural leadership, increasing the awareness of…

Youth Development
4
Iowa Corn Promotion Board

The iowa corn promotion board (icpb) works to develop and defend markets, fund research, and provide education about corn and corn products. icpb's mission is to create opportunities for long term iowa corn grower profitability.

—
5
Illinois Fertilizer & Chemical Association

To assist and represent the crop production supply and service industry and promote the sound stewardship and utilization of agricultural inputs.

—
6
Nebraska Corn Growers Association

To promote corn and corn products

—
7
Agribusiness Association of Iowa

The agribusiness association of iowa exists to advocate communicate and educate on behalf of a professional agribusiness industry.

—
8
South Dakota Corn Growers Association

Promote corn and corn products and improve corn profitability. influence public policy and increase corn usage through livestock feeding and new domestic products.

—
9
Indiana Agribusiness Council Inc

An agribusiness network advocate, representing members' interests within all levels of government and keeping members informed of the latest industry trends and news.

—
10
Organic Farmers Association

The mission of the Organic Farmers Association is to provide a strong and unified national voice for domestic certified organic producers so that organic agriculture will become the basis of a viable United States food and agricultural…

Food & Nutrition
11
National Council of Farmer Cooperatives

To advance the business and policy interests of america's cooperatives and other farmer-owned enterprises.

—
12
Iowa Renewable Fuels Association

To promote the common business interests of member companies without profit and without the inuring of income to the benefit of any member company or individual. to present the executive, legislative, judicial and regulatory bodies…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Illinois Corn Growers Association; the most unlike its peers is American Lung Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
14/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ILLINOIS CORN GROWERS ASSOCIATION: $6,505,333 · OtherILLINOIS CORN GROWERS ASSOCIATIONUS GRAINS COUNCIL: $2,996,819 · OtherUS GRAINS COUNCILUNITED STATES MEAT EXPORT FEDERATION INC: $1,450,000 · OtherUNITED STATES MEAT EXPORT FEDERATION INCUSA POULTRY & EGG EXPORT COUNCIL: $857,900 · OtherUSA POULTRY & EGG EXPORT COUNCILSOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY EDWARDSVILLE: $722,956 · Other+14 more: $2,522,673 · Other+14 moreUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $2,396,350 · EducationUniversity o…NATIONAL CORN GROWERS ASSOCIATION: $1,895,000 · Food & NutritionNATIONAL COR…ZEA MAYS FOUNDATION: $470,000 · Food & NutritionZEA MAYS FOU…+1 more: $5,000 · Food & NutritionAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $1,291,000 · HealthGROWTH ENERGY: $380,000 · Community ImprovementTHE GLOBAL FARMER NETWORK: $25,000 · Community ImprovementIllinois Foundation Future Farmers of America: $86,660 · Youth DevelopmentILLINOIS AGRICULTURAL LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Public Benefit
Other$15,055,681Education$2,396,350Food & Nutrition$2,370,000Health$1,291,000Community Improvement$405,000Youth Development$86,660Public Benefit$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetILLINOIS CORN GROWERS ASSOCIATION: $6,505,333 over 9y, 51% of budgetUS GRAINS COUNCIL: $2,996,819 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $2,396,350 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL CORN GROWERS ASSOCIATION: $1,895,000 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetUNITED STATES MEAT EXPORT FEDERATION INC: $1,450,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $1,291,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetUSA POULTRY & EGG EXPORT COUNCIL: $857,900 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetZEA MAYS FOUNDATION: $470,000 over 3y, 63% of budgetIAA Foundation: $450,000 over 5y, 10% of budgetGROWTH ENERGY: $380,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCLEAN FUELS DEVELOPMENT COALITION: $325,000 over 5y, 83% of budgetILLINOIS PORK PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION: $260,000 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetHEARTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetIllinois Agricultural Association: $112,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetIllinois Foundation Future Farmers of America: $86,660 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetILLINOIS AGRICULTURAL LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetTHE GLOBAL FARMER NETWORK: $25,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetGRAIN & FEED ASSOCIATION OF ILLINOIS: $12,795 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTEXAS CORN PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ILLINOIS CORN GROWERS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds US GRAINS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds University of Illinois Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CORN GROWERS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES MEAT EXPORT FEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds USA POULTRY & EGG EXPORT COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds ZEA MAYS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds IAA Foundation ↗
  • Who funds GROWTH ENERGY ↗
  • Who funds CLEAN FUELS DEVELOPMENT COALITION ↗
  • Who funds ILLINOIS PORK PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds HEARTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Illinois Agricultural Association ↗
  • Who funds Illinois Foundation Future Farmers of America ↗
  • Who funds ILLINOIS AGRICULTURAL LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE GLOBAL FARMER NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds GRAIN & FEED ASSOCIATION OF ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS CORN PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Indiana Corn Marketing CouncilIN15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Indiana Corn Marketing Council · Iowa Corn Grower's Association

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Illinois Corn Marketing Board funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Illinois Corn Marketing Board. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Illinois Corn Marketing Board?

    Find your warmest path to Illinois Corn Marketing Board through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Illinois Corn Marketing Board’s filings →

    More from the funding graph