Skip to content
II Corinthians 9 7 Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

II Corinthians 9 7 Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$216k
Granted FY2024still arriving
54
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.3MReligion$206kRecreation & Sports$201kHealth$45kPublic Benefit$39kAnimals$21kHuman Services$18kYouth Development$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 54 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k48 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $115k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
$256
Median grant
10
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST MICHAEL'S CATHOLIC ACADEMY$69,940
12TH MAN FOUNDATION$44,893
WESTLAKE HILLS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$38,998
YOUNG LIFE$10,732
Individual grant recipient$10,600
AUDOBON SOCIETY OF HOUSTON$10,100
TEXAS A&M FOUNDATION$4,924
HEARTGIFT FOUNDATION$4,500
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$2,500
EAST WEST (0567)$2,400
HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN$2,010
Individual grant recipient$1,600
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $2k → 10%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $500 → 10%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $486 → 10%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $230 → 10%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $163 → 10%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $108 → 10%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $26 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
NY
MA
NV
WY
OH
PA
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
DE
NM
AR
TN
DC
LA
MS
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 43 repeat orgs$116k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

43 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 30 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
105

Total granted

$1.7M
$97k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+22%

Still filing today

44%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    Texas A&M University 12th Man Foundation
    7× · 2017–2024 · $189k · revenue +55%
  • TA
    Texas A&M Foundation
    6× · 2019–2024 · $133k · revenue +74%
  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $14k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • VO
    VETRANS OF FOREIGN WARS
    one grant, 2022 · $39k
  • DC
    DELL CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2020 · $28k
  • HP
    HYDE PARK CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
2
Texas Medical Association

The texas medical association (tma), the nation's largest and one of the oldest state medical societies, represents over 59,000 physicians and medical students dedicated to enhancing the health of all texans. in collaboration with 110…

—
3
Greater Austin Christian Foundation

Mobilizing resources by inspiring biblical generosity in the greater austin, texas area.

Religion
4
Texas Children's Hospital Foundation

To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and research.

Health
5
Texas a&M Research Foundation

To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.

Education
6
Texas Association of Business

As the state chamber of commerce, tab is the most influential and dominant voice for public policy issues affecting business in texas. through proven results-oriented advocacy and member services, tab develops a climate in texas which…

—
7
Uatx

Uatx is a nonprofit dedicated to building a liberal arts university committed to freedom of inquiry, freedom of conscience, and civil discourse. to maintain these principles, the university will be fiercely independent financially,…

Education
8
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
9
Dallas Citizens Council

To lead and serve in the moments that matter the most for the people of dallas.

—
10
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
11
Texas Academy of Medicine Engineering Science and Technology

To provide broader recognition of the state's top achievers in medicine, engineering and science, and to build a stronger identity for texas as an important destination and center of achievement in these fields.

Health
12
Texas Children's

To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education, and research.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas a&M Foundation; the most unlike its peers is KIDZ1STFUND Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

52 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 52 of the 178 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
51/52
Grantees still filing
36/52
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST MICHAEL'S CATHOLIC ACADEMY: $971,974 · OtherST MICHAEL'S CATHOLIC ACADEMYWESTLAKE HILLS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $195,390 · OtherWESTLAKE HILLS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHKAPPA ALPHA ORDER: $55,711 · Other+148 more: $265,254 · Other+148 moreTexas A&M University 12th Man Foundation: $189,292 · EducationTexas A&M Universit…Texas A&M Foundation: $133,170 · EducationTexas A&M Foundatio…+4 more: $2,721 · EducationYOUNG LIFE: $13,732 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $2,500 · Youth Development+1 more: $290 · Youth DevelopmentMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC: $12,435 · Religion+1 more: $50 · ReligionHEARTGIFT FOUNDATION: $4,500 · HealthTHE MIRACLE FOUNDATION INC: $2,750 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $925 · HealthKIDZ1STFUND INC: $600 · HealthCHAMPIONSHIP HEARTS FOUNDATION: $500 · Health+8 more: $1,375 · HealthHELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $3,523 · Human ServicesHOUSTON LIVESTOCK SHOW AND RODEO INC: $1,600 · Recreation & SportsCAPITAL CITY A&M CLUB INC: $590 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,488,329Education$325,183Youth Development$16,522Religion$12,485Health$10,650Human Services$3,523Recreation & Sports$2,190

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTexas A&M University 12th Man Foundation: $189,292 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation: $133,170 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $13,732 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC: $12,435 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTGIFT FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ADMIRALS CLUB OF AUSTIN INC: $3,622 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetHELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $3,523 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MIRACLE FOUNDATION INC: $2,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEYOND BATTEN DISEASE FOUNDATION: $1,788 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSTON LIVESTOCK SHOW AND RODEO INC: $1,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $925 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL OF TEXAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COUNCIL: $850 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBetter ATX: $804 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMANOS DE CRISTO INC: $734 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOak Forest Homeowners Association: $680 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKIDZ1STFUND INC: $600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAPITAL CITY A&M CLUB INC: $590 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetTHE ASSOCIATION OF FORMER STUDENTS OF TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $506 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHAMPIONSHIP HEARTS FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAUSTIN SAMARITANS: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLAMESA BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC: $450 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWAYLAND BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $417 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILLOW CITY VOLUNTEER FIRE & RESCUE: $350 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRAIL OF LIGHTS FOUNDATION: $334 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA - CAPITOL AREA COUNCIL - TOM WOOTEN TRUST: $290 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCURESEARCH FOR CHILDREN'S CANCER: $275 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOLDED FLAG FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOR RECOVERY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN MIGUEL EDUCATIONAL FUND: $220 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ANDREW MCDONOUGH B FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $194 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $157 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR RARE DISORDERS INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN DISASTER RELIEF NETWORK: $106 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS 4000 FOR CANCER: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetScleroderma Research Foundation: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON: $99 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF AUSTIN INC: $97 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE: $60 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLONE STAR CIRCLE OF CARE: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew Canaan Society Inc: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTWELFTH STEP MINISTRY INC: $35 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER AUSTIN PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $30 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Texas A&M University 12th Man Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Texas A&M Foundation ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC ↗
  • Who funds HEARTGIFT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE ADMIRALS CLUB OF AUSTIN INC ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MIRACLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND BATTEN DISEASE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOUSTON LIVESTOCK SHOW AND RODEO INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Austin Community Foun…United Way WorldwideGreater Houston Commu…Topfer Family Foundat…United Way for Greate…Shell USA Company Fou…Nelson Puett Foundati…The Moody FoundationBetter Business BureauAscension SetonTexas Instruments Fou…Communities Foundatio…
Austin Community Foundation IncTX32.4× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Austin Community Foundation Inc · United Way Worldwide · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Topfer Family Foundation · United Way for Greater Austin · Shell USA Company Foundation · Nelson Puett Foundation · The Moody Foundation · Better Business Bureau · Ascension Seton · Texas Instruments Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization II Corinthians 9 7 Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from II Corinthians 9 7 Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 178 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on II Corinthians 9 7’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home