Skip to content
Ihub San Joaquin at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Ihub San Joaquin

To provide education, training, resources, & mentorship to entrepreneurs, innovators & students for the purpose of strengthening the economic climate of the san joaquin valley & to benefit the public by helping to create jobs & encourage economic development.

$270k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$77k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Community Improvement$339k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $170k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $77k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$407k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STOCKTON COMMUNITY KITCHEN$77,035
HUDDLE CO-WORK CREATE$48,000
ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE COALITION FOR WATER$32,490
DRC TRUCKING$29,850
WORK VINE 209$24,000
BEAM CIRCULAR$20,000
AFRICAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$15,833
SAN JOAQUIN PARTNERSHIP$6,492
MISSION METT LLC$5,675
SJC HISPANIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$5,520
KOMMUNITY HUB NORCAL$5,139
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MISSION MET LLC: $6k → 8%MAIN STREET LAUNCH: $20k → 10%STOCKTON COMMUNITY KITCHEN: $77k → 12%BEAM CIRCULAR: $20k → 15%MISSION METT LLC: $6k → 8%PORT LABS: $20k → 10%STOCKTON COMMUNITY KITCHEN: $55k → 12%HUDDLE CO-WORK CREATE: $48k → 12%HUDDLE CO-WORK CREATE: $37k → 12%AFRICAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF SAN JOAQUIN FOUNDATION: $27k → 12%STOCKTON COMMUNITY KITCHEN: $25k → 12%AFRICAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $16k → 12%VISIONARY HOME BUILDERS: $15k → 12%HUDDLE CO-WORK CREATE: $12k → 12%WORK VINE 209: $24k → 12%WORK VINE 209: $23k → 12%WORK VINE 209: $13k → 12%SAN JOAQUIN PARTNERSHIP: $6k → 12%SJC HISPANIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $6k → 12%KOMMUNITY HUB NORCAL: $23k → 12%KOMMUNITY HUB NORCAL: $5k → 12%DRC TRUCKING: $30k → 12%DRC TRUCKING: $22k → 12%ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE COALITION FOR WATER: $32k → 12%STOCKTON ART LEAGUE: $20k → 12%ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE COALITION FOR WATER: $20k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$429k · 7 repeat orgs$179k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
7

Total granted

$429k
$141k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+33%

Still filing today

29%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Community ImprovementEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AT
    A TAVOLA TOGETHER FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $156k · revenue +52%
  • HC
    HUDDLE CO-WORK CREATE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $60k
  • EJ
    ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE COALITION FOR WATER
    2× · 2023–2025 · $52k

Funded once

  • HC
    HUDDLE CO-WORK CREATE
    one grant, 2023 · $37k
  • WV
    WORK VINE 209
    one grant, 2023 · $23k
  • MS
    Main Street Launch
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Visalia Chamber of Commerce

To stimulate economic and community development programs in the san joaquin valley.

Community Improvement
2
California Asian Pacific Chamber of Commerce

To advance statewide economic development strategies through public and private partnerships, strong advocacy efforts and by providing resources in our local communities through a network of community-based organizations dedicated to…

Community Improvement
3
Sacramento Asian Pacific Chamber of Commerce

To educate our members and the community by developing programs designed to strengthen and expand the potential of asian pacific islander (api) businesses and the api community. sacc's core competency and our competitive advantage is our…

—
4
San Joaquin County Bar Foundation
Unclassified
5
Sacramento Hispanic Chamber of Commerce Foundation

Our mission is to strengthen the regions business community by providing education, technical assistance, access to capital, procurement facilitation and workforce development training.

Community Improvement
6
San Bernardino Area Chamber of Commerce

To promote the commercial, industrial and civic welfare of the people of San Bernardino by encouraging the production and distribution of goods and services through the creation of more jobs and by enhancing the productivity and…

—
7
Solano Affordable Housing Foundation
Housing & Shelter
8
Vallejo Chamber of Commerce

The purpose is to promote a healthy business environment in the city of Vallejo.

—
9
Capital Black Chamber of Commerce

The mission of the Sacramento Black chamber of commerce is to assure member businesses will benefit through services that sustain and increase their revenue. Additionally, the region will benefit through the growth of African American…

—
10
San Joaquin Valley Housing Collaborative

The san joaquin valley housing collaborative promotes affordable housing for our region by leading policy advocacy through systemic change, fostering cross-sector partnerships, and convening to share innovative solutions

Housing & Shelter
11
San Joaquin County Hispanic Chamber Foundation Inc

The purpose of this corporation shall be to promote education and economic development in san joaquin county and to carry on other charitable activities associated with this goal as allowed by law.

Community Improvement
12
Castro Valley Chamber of Commerce Inc

The mission of the Castro Valley/Eden Area Chamber of Commerce is to lead the community toward sustainable economic growth, advocate for a pro-business climate for members, honor the area's historical foundations and future promise, and…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is African American Chamber of San Joaquin Foundation; the most unlike its peers is A Tavola Together Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HUDDLE CO-WORK CREATE: $60,420 · OtherHUDDLE CO-WORK CREATEENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE COALITION FOR WATER: $52,490 · OtherENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE COALITION FOR WATERDRC TRUCKING: $52,250 · OtherDRC TRUCKINGWORK VINE 209: $37,000 · OtherWORK VINE 209HUDDLE CO-WORK CREATE: $36,980 · OtherHUDDLE CO-WORK CREATEKOMMUNITY HUB NORCAL: $28,150 · OtherKOMMUNITY HUB NORCALWORK VINE 209: $23,300 · OtherWORK VINE 209STOCKTON ART LEAGUE: $20,042 · OtherSTOCKTON ART LEAGUEIndividual grant recipient: $19,721 · OtherIndividual grant recipientVISIONARY HOME BUILDERS OF CALIFORNIA INC: $15,000 · Other+3 more: $18,192 · OtherA TAVOLA TOGETHER FOUNDATION: $156,115 · EducationA TAVOLA TOGETHER FOUNDATIONMain Street Launch: $20,420 · Community ImprovementBEAM CIRCULAR: $20,000 · Community ImprovementSAN JOAQUIN COUNTY HISPANIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $5,520 · Community ImprovementAFRICAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF SAN JOAQUIN FOUNDATION: $43,052 · Youth Development
Other$363,545Education$156,115Community Improvement$45,940Youth Development$43,052

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetA TAVOLA TOGETHER FOUNDATION: $156,115 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetAFRICAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF SAN JOAQUIN FOUNDATION: $43,052 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetMain Street Launch: $20,420 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSTOCKTON ART LEAGUE: $20,042 over 1y, 22% of budgetBEAM CIRCULAR: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetVISIONARY HOME BUILDERS OF CALIFORNIA INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ihub San Joaquin funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ihub San Joaquin. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ihub San Joaquin?

    Find your warmest path to Ihub San Joaquin through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ihub San Joaquin’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home