Skip to content
Ig Family Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Ig Family Foundation Inc

Providing financial aid to persons who have experienced a qualifying hardship and, as a result, are in need of immediate assistance.

$1.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$614k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Health$1.8MInternational$101kYouth Development$95kHuman Services$10kPhilanthropy$10k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $951,606, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,881,894 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $930,288 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $307k
  • $250k+1 grant · $614k
$65,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OneWorld Health Inc$614,485
Sugan G Komen$242,121
Best Buddies$65,000
Movember$20,000
Make-A-Wish Foundation of Georgia Inc$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Movember: $20k → 14%Girls Scouts of USA: $50k → 17%OneWorld Health Inc: $614k → 12%Best Buddies: $65k → 15%For Peace Inc: $22k → 8%Make A Wish Foundation of Georgia Inc: $55k → 8%Big Brothers Big Sisters of Metro Atlanta: $45k → 13%Movember: $10k → 14%OneWorld Health Inc: $373k → 12%Best Buddies in Georgia: $14k → 15%Make-A-Wish Foundation of Georgia Inc: $10k → 8%Tech Bridge Inc: $10k → 13%OneWorld Health Inc: $303k → 12%OneWorld Health Inc: $155k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 4 repeat orgs$379k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +4% since the first grant, against -9% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
5

Total granted

$1.6M
$137k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
-9%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $242k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OH
    OneWorld Health
    4× · 2022–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +16%
  • Best Buddies International Inc
    2× · 2024–2025 · $79k · revenue 0%
  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF GEORGIA INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $65k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • GS
    GIRL SCOUTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +24%
  • BB
    Big Brothers Big Sisters of Metro Atlanta Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $45k · revenue -9%
  • FI
    FORPEACE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $22k · revenue -69%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
2
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
3
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
4
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
5
Women in Global Health Inc

Women in global health (wgh) is a global movement and organization that brings together all genders and backgrounds to achieve gender equality in global health leadership.

Public Benefit
6
One World Surgery

One world surgery's mission is to ignite the spirit of service and transform lives by providing access to high-quality surgical care globally.

International
7
Banner Health

Banner health's nonprofit mission is "making health care easier, so life can be better".

Health
8
Global Poverty Project Inc

Our mission is to build a movement of global citizens whose actions will help achieve our vision of a world without extreme poverty.

Social Science
9
Medtech Innovator

Medtech innovator organizes and runs a global competition and virtual accelerator for medical device, digital health, and diagnostic startup companies.

Education
10
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International
11
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
12
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Georgia Inc; the most unlike its peers is Movember Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
3/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OneWorld Health: $1,445,780 · InternationalOneWorld HealthBest Buddies International Inc: $79,000 · InternationalThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $242,121 · HealthThe Susan G Kom…MOVEMBER FOUNDATION: $30,000 · HealthMOVEMBER FOUNDA…MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF GEORGIA INC: $65,000 · PhilanthropyTECHBRIDGE INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyGIRL SCOUTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentBig Brothers Big Sisters of Metro Atlanta Inc: $45,000 · OtherFORPEACE INC: $21,911 · Community ImprovementBCFS Health and Human Services: $10,000 · Human Services
International$1,524,780Health$272,121Philanthropy$75,000Youth Development$50,000Other$45,000Community Improvement$21,911Human Services$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOneWorld Health: $1,445,780 over 4y, 8.4% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $242,121 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBest Buddies International Inc: $79,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF GEORGIA INC: $65,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters of Metro Atlanta Inc: $45,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMOVEMBER FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFORPEACE INC: $21,911 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetBCFS Health and Human Services: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTECHBRIDGE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundat…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA11.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ig Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ig Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Best Buddies International Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ig Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home