Skip to content
Hyman & Marjorie Weinberg Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Hyman & Marjorie Weinberg Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$61k
Granted FY2021
27
Grants FY2021
10
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2021.

Health$16kEducation$13kPhilanthropy$10kFood & Nutrition$6kAnimals$4kHousing & Shelter$3kEmployment$2kHuman Services$2kOther$0
02FY2021 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k26 grants · $51k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIV OF S DAKOTA FOUNDATION (ROSEBUD YELLOW ROBE ENDOWMENT)$10,000
CURE ALZHEIMER'S FUND$5,000
THE NOAH BENJAMIN REISMAN FOUNDATION$5,000
ADELPHI UNIVERSITY$5,000
HAMPTON LIBRARY$5,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOC$4,000
JDRF (JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION)$4,000
PHILABUNDANCE$2,500
PROJECT HOME$2,000
PAWS (PHILA ANIMAL WELFARE SOC)$2,000
THE WARDROBE (FKA THE CAREER WARDROBE)$2,000
BRIDGEHAMPTON CHILDCARE CENTER$2,000
RESCUE & WELFARE TRUST FUND OF THE BULL TERRIER CLUB OF AMERICA$2,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOC$1,000
PHILA OUTRIGGER CANOE CLUB (POCC)$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PROJECT HOME: $2k → 22%SUNDAY LOVE PROJECT: $3k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
SD
PA
RI
CA
AZ
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
4
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
6
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
7
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
8
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
9
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
10
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Saint Joseph's University

As philadelphia's jesuit catholic university, saint joseph's provides a rigorous, student-centered education rooted in the liberal arts. we prepare students for personal excellence, professional success, and engaged citizenship. striving…

Education
12
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Philabundance; the most unlike its peers is Rescue & Welfare Trust Fund of the Btca. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIV OF S DAKOTA FOUNDATION (ROSEBUD YELLOW ROBE ENDOWMENT): $10,000 · OtherUNIV OF S DAKOTA FOUNDATION (ROSEBUD YELLOW ROBE ENDOWMENT)HAMPTON LIBRARY: $5,000 · OtherHAMPTON LIBRARYTHE NOAH BENJAMIN REISMAN FOUNDATION: $5,000 · OtherTHE NOAH BENJAMIN REISMAN FOUNDATIONJDRF (JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION): $4,000 · OtherJDRF (JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION)BRIDGEHAMPTON CHILDCARE CENTER: $2,000 · OtherPAWS (PHILA ANIMAL WELFARE SOC): $2,000 · OtherTHE WARDROBE (FKA THE CAREER WARDROBE): $2,000 · Other+12 more: $8,350 · Other+12 moreALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEA…American Heart Association Inc: $5,000 · HealthAmerican Heart As…+1 more: $250 · HealthADELPHI UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · EducationADELPHI UN…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1,000 · EducationTRUSTEES O…THE SUNDAY LOVE PROJECT INC: $2,700 · Human ServicesPROJECT HOME: $2,000 · Human ServicesPhilabundance: $2,500 · Food & NutritionSHARE FOOD PROGRAM: $500 · Food & NutritionRESCUE & WELFARE TRUST FUND OF THE BTCA: $2,000 · AnimalsTREVOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 · Civil RightsHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION: $250 · Civil Rights
Other$38,350Health$10,250Education$6,000Human Services$4,700Food & Nutrition$3,000Animals$2,000Civil Rights$1,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetADELPHI UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SUNDAY LOVE PROJECT INC: $2,700 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetPhilabundance: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HOME: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRESCUE & WELFARE TRUST FUND OF THE BTCA: $2,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JOHN THE EVANGELIST HOMELESS SHELTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE FOOD PROGRAM: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF LAUREL HILL AND WEST LAUREL HILL CEMETERIES: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCURTIS INSTITUTE OF MUSIC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Association for Cancer Research Foundation: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hyman & Marjorie Weinberg Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hyman & Marjorie Weinberg Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hyman & Marjorie Weinberg Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Hyman & Marjorie Weinberg Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hyman & Marjorie Weinberg’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home