Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Hurst Wood Education Foundation

To transform, through education, the lives of children with autism and the lives of their families.

$2.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$600k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Education$2.9MHealth$1.5MPhilanthropy$150kHuman Services$30k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $28k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $267k
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.7M
$300,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SCENICVIEW ACADEMY INC$600,000
SPECTRUM ACADEMY$415,000
THE LEARNING CENTER FOR FAMILIES DBA ROOT FOR KIDS$400,000
UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY$300,000
PETERSBURG BOROUGH SCHOOL DISTRICT$166,500
ST GEORGE ACADEMY$50,000
WASHINGTON COUNTY SC DIS FOUNDATION$50,000
FREEDOM KITS OF YAKIMA$28,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 84% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%SPECTRUM ACADEMY: $415k → 6%UTAH AUTISM ACADEMY: $325k → 8%THE REFUGE UTAH: $30k → 8%THE LEARNING CENTER FOR FAMILIES DBA ROOT FOR KIDS: $400k → 10%FREEDOM KITS OF YAKIMA: $28k → 17%PETERSBURG BOROUGH SCHOOL DISTRICT: $167k → 7%MADISON HOUSE AUTISM FOUNDATION: $40k → 8%SPECTRUM ACADEMY: $322k → 6%UTAH AUTISM ACADEMY: $316k → 8%THE RAY AND TYE NOORDA FOUNDATION: $150k → 8%THE LEARNING CENTER FOR FAMILIES DBA ROOT FOR KIDS: $150k → 10%UTAH AUTISM ACADEMY: $51k → 8%UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY: $300k → 8%THE LEARNING CENTER FOR FAMILIES DBA ROOT FOR KIDS: $100k → 10%UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY: $150k → 8%WASHINGTON COUNTY SC DIS FOUNDATION: $50k → 10%UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY: $100k → 8%ST GEORGE ACADEMY: $50k → 10%SCENICVIEW ACADEMY INC: $600k → 8%ST GEORGE ACADEMY: $50k → 10%SCENICVIEW ACADEMY INC: $400k → 8%ST GEORGE ACADEMY: $50k → 10%SCENICVIEW ACADEMY INC: $250k → 8%UTAH REGIONAL HOSPITAL: $100k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.0M · 6 repeat orgs$565k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
4

Total granted

$4.0M
$320k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+53%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $245k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    ScenicView Academy
    3× · 2022–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +96%
  • SA
    Spectrum Academy
    2× · 2023–2024 · $737k · revenue +14%
  • UA
    UTAH AUTISM ACADEMY
    3× · 2019–2021 · $692k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • TR
    THE RAY AND TYE NOORDA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $150k · revenue -33%
  • IH
    IHC HEALTH SERVICES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +53%
  • MH
    MADISON HOUSE AUTISM FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $40k · revenue -83%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Ranches Academy Incorporated

Public charter school educating Utah students.

Education
2
Timpanogos Academy Foundation

To establish a school where each student gains the scholarly knowledge and skills vital to becoming a self-motivated, lifelong learner and to succeed in the rapidly evolving and complex world. This mission will be accomplished by using the…

Education
3
Utah Arts Academy

Utah Arts Academy is a premier academic and arts-focused school. By combining rigorous academic programming with pre-professional training in a wide array of arts (theatre, dance, music, visual and media arts), we inspire our students'…

Education
4
Terra Academy

Terra academy focuses on each student as a "unique" whole person in a global society by providing individualized instruction in a community learning model through educational experiences including a broad range of curricular options and…

Education
5
Utah County Academy of Sciences

A Utah public charter school supported by state and federal funding.

Education
6
Midwives College of Utah

Educate and train midwives to provide safe, professional, affordable and personal maternity and general health care.

Education
7
Salt Lake Arts Academy

To prepare students to become confident and creative builders of their future, equipped through the arts and academics to take responsibility for shaping their communities.

Education
8
Venture Academy

Inspire the rising generation to reach the heights of their potential, ignite their curiosity to venture into challenging new learning experiences, and through service, empower them to be leaders who are committed to family and community…

Education
9
Summit Academy Incorporated

To manage and operate a Utah public charter school funded by local, state and federal sources.

Education
10
Lakeview Academy of Science Arts and Technology

To manage, operate, guide, direct, and promote a public charter school funded by local, state, and federal sources.

Education
11
The Freedom Academy Foundation

Kindergarten through 12th grade charter school in the State of Utah.

Education
12
Leadership Academy of Utah

To prepare promising students for meaningful lives as principled leaders.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Women and Children in Crisis and the most unlike its peers is The Ray and Tye Noorda Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ScenicView Academy — $1,250,000 · EducationScenicView AcademySpectrum Academy — $737,000 · EducationSpectrum AcademyUTAH AUTISM ACADEMY — $691,973 · EducationUTAH AUTISM ACADEMYUTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $550,000 · EducationUTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCSt George Academy — $150,000 · EducationTHE LEARNING CENTER FOR FAMILIES — $650,000 · HealthTHE LEARNING CENTER …IHC HEALTH SERVICES INC — $100,000 · HealthIHC HEALTH SERVICES …MADISON HOUSE AUTISM FOUNDATION INC — $40,000 · HealthThe Center for Women and Children in Crisis — $30,000 · Health+1 more — $28,000 · HealthRAE C STEDMAN ELEMENTARY PARTNERS IN EDUCATION INC — $166,500 · OtherTHE WASHINGTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION — $50,000 · OtherTHE RAY AND TYE NOORDA FOUNDATION — $150,000 · Philanthropy
Education$3,378,973Health$848,000Other$216,500Philanthropy$150,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetScenicView Academy — $1,250,000 over 3y, 9.2% of budgetSpectrum Academy — $737,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetUTAH AUTISM ACADEMY — $691,973 over 3y, 7.6% of budgetTHE LEARNING CENTER FOR FAMILIES — $650,000 over 3y, 7.7% of budgetUTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $550,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetSt George Academy — $150,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetTHE RAY AND TYE NOORDA FOUNDATION — $150,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetIHC HEALTH SERVICES INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WASHINGTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetMADISON HOUSE AUTISM FOUNDATION INC — $40,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetThe Center for Women and Children in Crisis — $30,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Vivint Giveback FoundationUT13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Vivint Giveback Foundation · The Ashton Family Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hurst Wood Education Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hurst Wood Education Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Hurst Wood Education Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph