Skip to content
Hungry for a Day at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Hungry for a Day

A non-profit organization that seeks to inspire generosity in others.

$375k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$102k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$363kReligion$105kHuman Services$42kYouth Development$11k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $328,301, the rows itemized in this filing. The $375,289 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $46,988 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $207k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $102k
$23,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$107k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Sweetwater Mission$102,000
Caroll County Soup Kitchen$47,000
The Pantry$42,575
Individual grant recipient$25,726
City of Refuge$25,000
Madison Morgan Community Food Pantry$23,500
Pure Hope$17,000
Radius Church$16,100
New Path$10,000
Chaffin Church$7,000
Warehouse of Hope$6,400
Nichols Center$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $205k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 36% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Sweetwater Mission: $102k → 8%Madison Morgan Community Food Pantry: $24k → 11%Sweetwater Mission: $30k → 8%Madison Morgan Community Food Pantry: $15k → 11%Life Tools Community Development Corporation aka The Pantry: $35k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$345k · 6 repeat orgs$176k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
4

Total granted

$345k
$78k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

83%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $98k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionReligionYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    SWEETWATER MISSION INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $132k · revenue 0%
  • CC
    Carroll County Soup Kitchen Inc
    2× · 2024–2025 · $67k · revenue -12%
  • CO
    CITY OF REFUGE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $50k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • LT
    LIFE TOOLS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    one grant, 2024 · $35k · revenue 0%
  • LC
    LAKEPOINTE CHURCH INC
    one grant, 2024 · $30k
  • HH
    HELPING HANDS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Jerusalem Outreach Ministries

Provide human social educational and spiritual services to individuals in the community

Religion
2
Bread of Life Community Services
Food & Nutrition
3
Light of the World Neighborhood and Economic Development Inc

Assist homeless, hungry, and people in low income communities.

Community Improvement
4
Jabez Ministries Inc
Food & Nutrition
5
Community for Christ Outreach

Religious Orginazation

Housing & Shelter
6
Grace Resource Center Inc

To provide food, shelter, clothing, medical assistance and other immediate need to the thousands of needy and homeless people living in our area.

Housing & Shelter
7
Messengers of Hope Mission Inc

mobile food pantry

Food & Nutrition
8
Bread of Refuge Inc

Bread of Refuge is a food pantry that distributes over 1600 banana boxes of food every month to families in need. We also feed 75-to-100 homeless people every week.

Human Services
9
3G Food Pantry

Local food pantry serving those food insecurity.

Food & Nutrition
10
Delivery Hope Ministries

Charitable

Human Services
11
People Help Exchange Inc

Food Pantry to combat hunger and prevent homelessness.

Public Safety & Disaster
12
Victory Life Church International

Church, religious

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Life Tools Community Development Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Nichols Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
2/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SWEETWATER MISSION INC: $132,000 · Human ServicesSWEETWATER MISSION INCMadison-Morgan Community Food Pantry Inc: $38,000 · Human ServicesMadison-Morgan Community Food Pantry IncLIFE TOOLS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $35,000 · Human ServicesLIFE TOOLS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONThe Pantry: $42,575 · OtherThe PantryRADIUS CHURCH ST PETE INC: $30,350 · OtherRADIUS CHURCH ST PETE INCLAKEPOINTE CHURCH INC: $29,956 · OtherLAKEPOINTE CHURCH INCIndividual grant recipient: $25,726 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHAFFIN CHURCH: $7,000 · OtherHELPING HANDS INC: $7,000 · OtherLORD OF THE HARVEST CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP: $6,000 · OtherCarroll County Soup Kitchen Inc: $67,000 · Food & NutritionCarroll County …WAREHOUSE OF HOPE INC: $6,400 · Food & NutritionWAREHOUSE OF HO…CITY OF REFUGE: $50,000 · ReligionCITY OF RE…PURE HOPE INC: $28,000 · Youth DevelopmentNEW PATH 1010 INC: $10,000 · Civil RightsNICHOLS CENTER INC: $6,000 · Health
Human Services$205,000Other$148,607Food & Nutrition$73,400Religion$50,000Youth Development$28,000Civil Rights$10,000Health$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSWEETWATER MISSION INC: $132,000 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetCarroll County Soup Kitchen Inc: $67,000 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetCITY OF REFUGE: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMadison-Morgan Community Food Pantry Inc: $38,000 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetLIFE TOOLS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $35,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetPURE HOPE INC: $28,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetNEW PATH 1010 INC: $10,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetWAREHOUSE OF HOPE INC: $6,400 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greystone Power Found…Amazonsmile Foundation
Greystone Power Foundation IncGA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greystone Power Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hungry for a Day funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hungry for a Day. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hungry for a Day?

    Find your warmest path to Hungry for a Day through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hungry for a Day’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home