Skip to content
Hundred Acres Manor Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Hundred Acres Manor Inc

To further exempt purposes and distribute funds to local charitable organizations

$21k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$65kHousing & Shelter$61kHuman Services$40kHealth$20kRecreation & Sports$9kEmployment$8k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $9,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $20,824 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $11,824 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$9,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$291k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PITTSBURGH AMATEUR PREDATORS HOCKEY ASSOCIATION$9,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC: $15k → 11%LIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC: $10k → 11%WARD HOME: $10k → 11%THE WATSON INSTITUTE: $5k → 11%WARD HOME: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$160k · 4 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +34% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
4

Total granted

$160k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+34%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesAnimalsPhilanthropyHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HOMELESS CHILDREN'S EDUCATION FUND
    5× · 2017–2023 · $61k · revenue +96%
  • AF
    Animal Friends Inc
    5× · 2017–2023 · $59k · revenue +24%
  • WH
    WARD HOME INC
    2× · 2017–2019 · $15k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • BC
    BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +4%
  • 2C
    25 CARRICK AVE PROJECT
    one grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue -5%
  • JC
    JEFFERSON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue +34%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane Pennsylvania

Humane pennsylvania empowers the people in our communities to increase their capacity to care for animals so that all animals are healthy, safe, and treated humanely.

Animals
2
Wrc Pennsylvania Memorial Home

Wrc pennsylvania memorial home's mission is to provide choices for generations. built on a not-for-profit foundation of caring, the organization offers residential and personal care, home and community-based services, skilled and…

Health
3
Zoological Society of Pittsburgh

The zoological society of pittsburgh is dedicated to being a leader in, and significant contributor to, the conservation of endangered and threatened species. the society provides an enjoyable family experience that fosters understanding,…

Animals
4
Housing Alliance of Pennsylvania

The housing alliance of pennsyvlania ("hap") has played a leading role in many significant housing policy advances. hap is an influential community of housing consumers, advocates, producers, providers, policy makers and government…

—
5
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
6
Humane Animal Rescue

We strive to provide all aspects of care to abandoned, neglected, and injured animals; reunite lost pets with their caregivers or seek new families for them; educate the community on humane care and interactions with all animals with the…

Animals
7
Auberle

Since 1952, auberle has been able to help thousands of individuals and their families by providing care, foster care, emergency shelter, in-home intervention, educational and workforce development programs, and community-based mental…

Human Services
8
Franklin County Humane Society

Temporary shelter & adoption of homeless pets.

Animals
9
Authoracare Collective

Authoracare collective empowers people to be active participants in their care journey, enabling them to live on their own terms through personalized support for mind, body, and spirit.

Human Services
10
Lawrence County Association for Responsible Care

To advocate for and provide quality services to people with developmental disabilities and ensure their health, safety and welfare while promoting personal choice and growth.

Human Services
11
Philadelphia Animal Welfare Society

Dedicated to saving philadelphias homeless and at-risk pets through rescue, adoption, and provision of veterinary care and other pet owner support services.

Animals
12
Pennsylvania Psychiatric Institute

Ppi is operated solely by penn state health and is dedicated to providing exceptional clinical care, advancing diverse educational opportunities for the next generation of behavioral health specialists, fostering impactful research, and…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Homeless Children's Education Fund; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Animal Friends Inc: $58,500 · AnimalsAnimal Friends IncJEFFERSON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $6,000 · AnimalsJEFFERSON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETYHOMELESS CHILDREN'S EDUCATION FUND: $61,000 · PhilanthropyHOMELESS CHILDREN'S EDUCATION FUNDLIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesLIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES …WARD HOME INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesWARD HOME INCTHE WATSON INSTITUTE: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE WATSON INSTITUTEBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $15,000 · HealthPITTSBURGH AMATEUR PREDATORS HOCKEY ASSOCIATION: $9,000 · Recreation & Sports25 CARRICK AVE PROJECT: $7,500 · Other
Animals$64,500Philanthropy$61,000Human Services$45,000Health$15,000Recreation & Sports$9,000Other$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOMELESS CHILDREN'S EDUCATION FUND: $61,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetAnimal Friends Inc: $58,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetLIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWARD HOME INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPITTSBURGH AMATEUR PREDATORS HOCKEY ASSOCIATION: $9,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget25 CARRICK AVE PROJECT: $7,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetJEFFERSON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $6,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHE WATSON INSTITUTE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

The Pittsburgh Founda…
The Pittsburgh FoundationPA13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hundred Acres Manor Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hundred Acres Manor Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hundred Acres Manor’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home