Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Hummingbird Society Foundation

Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$608k
Granted FY2017
16
Grants FY2017
10
States reached
$100k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

67% of Hummingbird Society Foundation’s FY2019 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2019 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2017, the last year Hummingbird Society Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 8 organizations, $608k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

8
17
1
18
1
19

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172019.

Philanthropy$5.7MEnvironment$3.1MCivil Rights$200kHealth$92kScience & Tech$50kHousing & Shelter$5kAnimals$3kYouth Development$3k
02FY2017 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2017

  • Under $10k5 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $550k
$10,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Southern Poverty Law Center$100,000
ACLU Foundation$100,000
World Wildlife Fund$100,000
Natural Resource Defense Council$100,000
Environmental Defense Fund$50,000
Planned Parenthood Federation of America$50,000
Union of Concerned Scientists$50,000
Planned Parenthood Federation of America$10,000
Planned Parenthood Federation of America$10,000
Volunteers in Medicine HHI$10,000
Wilderness Society$10,000
Triangle Community Foundation$5,000
Hilton Head Habitat for Humanity$5,000
World Vets$3,000
Yana Club$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–19) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Union of Concerned Scientists: $50k → 8%SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND: $2.1M → 10%Planned Parenthood Federation of America: $50k → 17%Hilton Head Habitat for Humanity: $5k → 10%World Wildlife Fund: $100k → 14%Southern Poverty Law Center: $100k → 18%Triangle Community Foundation: $5k → 11%HONEY BEE HEALTH COALITION: $10k → 9%GROWING TREE FOUNDATION: $1.5M → 16%Natural Resource Defense Council: $100k → 14%World Vets: $3k → 12%Volunteers in Medicine HHI: $10k → 10%SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND: $1.7M → 10%Planned Parenthood Federation of America: $10k → 17%Environmental Defense Fund: $50k → 14%GROWING TREE FOUNDATION: $832k → 16%SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND: $800k → 10%Planned Parenthood Federation of America: $10k → 17%Wilderness Society: $10k → 14%GROWING TREE FOUNDATION: $459k → 16%SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND: $707k → 10%ACLU Foundation: $100k → 17%GROWING TREE FOUNDATION: $58k → 16%SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND: $197k → 10%Prospect House Inc: $2k → 16%SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND: $57k → 10%SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND: $57k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
ND
IL
NY
MA
OH
CA
CO
NC
SC
DC
AL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
2
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
3
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
4
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
5
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

6
Cdp North America Inc

Cdp north america, inc. 's ("cdp-na") vision for the future is a thriving economy that works for people and planet in the long term. we focus investors and companies on taking urgent action to build a truly sustainable economy by measuring…

Environment
7
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
8
Center for International Environmental Law Inc

To investigate, research, write, publish, present conferences and teach with respect to global, regional, transboundary, and comparative environmental issues and to make the findings from such activities available to the general public; to…

International
9
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
10
National Forest Foundation

The national forest foundation, chartered by congress, engages americans in community-based and national programs that promote the health and public enjoyment of the 193-million acre national forest system, and accepts and administers…

Recreation & Sports
11
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
12
The Trust for Public Land

The trust for public land creates parks and protects land for people, ensuring healthy, livable communities for generations to come. in the past year, we helped communities to plan for parks and conservation, fund parks and conservation,…

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Environmental Defense Fund Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is Growing Tree Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $5,711,572 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC+1 more — $5,000 · PhilanthropyGROWING TREE FOUNDATION INC — $2,859,751 · OtherGROWING TREE FOUNDATION INCNatural Resource Defense Council — $100,000 · Other+5 more — $31,000 · OtherWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $100,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $50,000 · EnvironmentTHE WILDERNESS SOCIETY — $10,000 · EnvironmentAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 · Civil RightsSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $100,000 · Crime & LegalPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $70,000 · Health+1 more — $2,000 · HealthTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC — $50,000 · International
Philanthropy$5,716,572Other$2,990,751Environment$160,000Civil Rights$100,000Crime & Legal$100,000Health$72,000International$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $5,711,572 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGROWING TREE FOUNDATION INC — $2,859,751 over 2y, 98% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $70,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WILDERNESS SOCIETY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRIANGLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetProspect House Inc — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hummingbird Society Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hummingbird Society Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Hummingbird Society Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph