Skip to content
Humangood Foundation West at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Humangood Foundation West

At humangood we believe everyone should have the opportunity to live with enthusiasm, confidence and security, regardless of physical, social, or economic circumstances.

$3.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$7.3MHousing & Shelter$6.1MHealth$548kArts & Culture$40kRecreation & Sports$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 16 grants below total $2,637,124, the rows itemized in this filing. The $3,321,138 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $684,014 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $42k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $971k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.6M
$11,877
Median grant
1
States reached
$86M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HUMANGOOD NORCAL$1,142,204
HUMANGOOD FRESNO$446,225
HUMANGOOD SOCAL$233,082
HUMANGOOD WASHINGTON$220,313
HUMANGOOD ARIZONA$205,163
HUMANGOOD CORNERSTONE$178,250
HUMANGOOD NEVADA$134,103
SUN TOWER$11,877
ANDRES DUARTE TERRACE$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$8,176
SHEPHERD GARDEN APT$7,981
Individual grant recipient$7,500
JUDSON TERRACE$6,750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $8.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 58% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HUMANGOOD NORCAL FKA ABHOW: $984k → 10%HUMANGOOD NORCAL: $1.5M → 14%HUMANGOOD NORCAL: $842k → 10%HUMANGOOD NORCAL: $1.1M → 14%HUMANGOOD NORCAL FKA ABHOW: $824k → 10%HUMANGOOD NORCAL: $937k → 14%HUMANGOOD NORCAL: $703k → 10%HUMANGOOD NORCAL: $779k → 14%HUMANGOOD SOCAL: $233k → 14%HUMANGOOD ARIZONA INC DBA TERRACES OF PHOENIX: $43k → 10%HUMANGOOD ARIZONA INC DBA TERRACES OF PHOENIX: $41k → 10%HUMANGOOD ARIZONA INC FKA AMERICAN BAPTIST ESTATES: $38k → 10%HUMANGOOD AFFORDABLE HOUSING: $98k → 14%HUMANGOOD SOCAL: $69k → 14%HUMANGOOD AFFORDABLE HOUSING: $31k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14M · 12 repeat orgs$259k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
13

Total granted

$14M
$200k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+19%

Still filing today

83%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $59k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Housing & ShelterHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HN
    HUMANGOOD NORCAL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $7.7M · revenue +45%
  • HF
    HUMANGOOD FRESNO
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +49%
  • HW
    HUMANGOOD WASHINGTON
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • VV
    VALLEY VISTA
    one grant, 2023 · $30k
  • AT
    ALLEN TEMPLE ARMS I
    one grant, 2023 · $28k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $24k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Senior Affordable Housing Corp No 3

At humangood we believe everyone should have the opportunity to live with enthusiasm, confidence, and security, regardless of physical, social, or economic circumstrances. and when we say everyone, we mean everyone - including you.

Housing & Shelter
2
Mountain Park Terrace Inc

At humangood we believe everyone should have the opportunity to live with enthusiasm, confidence, and security, regardless of physical, social, or economic circumstrances. and when we say everyone, we mean everyone - including you.

Housing & Shelter
3
Humangood Foundation West

At humangood we believe everyone should have the opportunity to live with enthusiasm, confidence and security, regardless of physical, social, or economic circumstances. and when we say everyone, we mean everyone - including you. continued…

Human Services
4
Humangood

At humangood we believe everyone should have the opportunity to live with enthusiasm, confidence and security, regardless of physical, social, or economic circumstances. and when we say everyone, we mean everyone - including you.because we…

Housing & Shelter
5
Humangood East

At humangood we believe everyone should have the opportunity to live with enthusiasm, confidence and security, regardless of physical, social, or economic circumstances. and when we say everyone, we mean everyone - including you. because…

Housing & Shelter
6
Humangood Foundation South

At humangood we believe everyone should have the opportunity to live with enthusiasm, confidence and security, regardless of physical, social, or economic circumstances. and when we say everyone, we mean everyone - including you. continued…

Human Services
7
Oak Knolls Haven Inc

At humangood we believe everyone should have the opportunity to live with enthusiasm, confidence, and security, regardless of physical, social, or economic circumstrances. and when we say everyone, we mean everyone - including you.

—
8
Westminster Gardens

The mission of the organization is to redefine the meaning of aging well for adults 55 and older, and deliver products and services that offer opportunities to pursue engaged, purposeful lives.

—
9
Redwood Senior Homes & Services Corporation

The mission of the organization is to redefine the meaning of aging well for adults 55 and older, and deliver products and services that offer opportunities to pursue engaged, purposeful lives.

—
10
West Valley Nursing Homes Inc

At humangood we believe everyone should have the opportunity to live with enthusiasm, confidence and security, regardless of physical, social, or economic circumstances. and when we say everyone, we mean everyone - including you. because…

Health
11
Mount Pleasant Home Inc

At humangood we believe everyone should have the opportunity to live with enthusiasm, confidence and security, regardless of physical, social, or economic circumstances. and when we say everyone, we mean everyone - including you. continued…

—
12
Humangood Pennsylvania

At humangood we believe everyone should have the opportunity to live with enthusiasm, confidence and security, regardless of physical, social, or economic circumstances. and when we say everyone, we mean everyone - including you. because…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Humangood Affordable Housing; the most unlike its peers is Vista Community Clinic. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HUMANGOOD NORCAL: $7,730,867 · Human ServicesHUMANGOOD NORCALHUMANGOOD SOCAL: $302,311 · Human Services+2 more: $250,747 · Human ServicesHUMANGOOD FRESNO: $2,328,838 · Housing & ShelterHUMANGOOD FRESNOHUMANGOOD CORNERSTONE: $782,233 · Housing & ShelterHUMANGOOD CORNERSTONEHUMANGOOD NEVADA: $610,881 · Housing & ShelterHUMANGOOD NEVADAHUMANGOOD IDAHO: $592,726 · Housing & ShelterHUMANGOOD IDAHO+7 more: $110,412 · Housing & ShelterHUMANGOOD WASHINGTON: $1,160,587 · HealthHUMANGOOD…+1 more: $5,500 · HealthVALLEY VISTA: $30,306 · OtherALLEN TEMPLE ARMS I: $28,470 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $24,227 · OtherHARBORVIEW MANOR: $21,032 · OtherSUN TOWER: $19,545 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $15,106 · OtherALLEN TEMPLE GARDENS: $11,378 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,686 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherFILIPINO COMMUNITY VILLAGE: $10,000 · OtherTOWER PARK: $9,625 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $8,176 · OtherSHEPHERD GARDEN APT: $7,981 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,500 · Other
Human Services$8,283,925Housing & Shelter$4,425,090Health$1,166,087Other$224,032

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHUMANGOOD NORCAL: $7,730,867 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetHUMANGOOD FRESNO: $2,328,838 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetHUMANGOOD WASHINGTON: $1,160,587 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetHUMANGOOD CORNERSTONE: $782,233 over 4y, 7.3% of budgetHUMANGOOD NEVADA: $610,881 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetHUMANGOOD IDAHO: $592,726 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetHUMANGOOD SOCAL: $302,311 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHUMANGOOD AFFORDABLE HOUSING: $128,899 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHUMANGOOD ARIZONA INC: $121,848 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBEACON SENIOR HOUSING CORP: $47,262 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetSENIOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING CORP NO 4: $10,500 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetREDDING MOUNTAIN VISTAS II: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetANDRES DUARTE TERRACE: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBANDERA SENIOR HOUSING CORP: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetROSE VIEW TERRACE INC: $8,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetVISTA COMMUNITY CLINIC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HUMANGOOD NORCAL ↗
  • Who funds HUMANGOOD FRESNO ↗
  • Who funds HUMANGOOD WASHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds HUMANGOOD CORNERSTONE ↗
  • Who funds HUMANGOOD NEVADA ↗
  • Who funds HUMANGOOD IDAHO ↗
  • Who funds HUMANGOOD SOCAL ↗
  • Who funds HUMANGOOD AFFORDABLE HOUSING ↗
  • Who funds HUMANGOOD ARIZONA INC ↗
  • Who funds BEACON SENIOR HOUSING CORP ↗
  • Who funds JUDSON TERRACE HOMES INC ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING CORP NO 4 ↗
  • Who funds REDDING MOUNTAIN VISTAS II ↗
  • Who funds ANDRES DUARTE TERRACE ↗
  • Who funds BANDERA SENIOR HOUSING CORP ↗
  • Who funds ROSE VIEW TERRACE INC ↗
  • Who funds VISTA COMMUNITY CLINIC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA0.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Humangood Foundation West funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Humangood Foundation West. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Humangood Foundation West?

    Find your warmest path to Humangood Foundation West through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Humangood Foundation West’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home