Skip to content
Human Immunome Project Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Human Immunome Project Inc

To maximize the potential of advanced immunological data to transform health outcomes for everyone, everywhere.

$543k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$81k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$6.3MScience & Tech$2.8MEducation$866kSocial Science$247k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $153,900, the rows itemized in this filing. The $542,533 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $388,633 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$81,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE$81,000
TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INSTITUTE$72,900
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 92% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $73k → 11%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $150k → 8%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $150k → 11%THE WISTAR INSTITUTE (UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA): $150k → 22%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $150k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE: $81k → 10%J CRAIG VENTER INSTITUTE: $374k → 11%LA JOLLA INSTITUTE: $126k → 14%THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $150k → 17%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS: $150k → 11%VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $1.7M → 14%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO ANSCHUTZ MEDICAL CAMPUS: $150k → 10%INFECTIOUS DISEASE RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $64k → 9%J CRAIG VENTER INSTITUTE: $442k → 8%TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $73k → 11%J CRAIG VENTER INSTITUTE: $367k → 11%LA JOLLA INSTITUTE: $123k → 14%JOAN & SANFORD WEIL MEDICAL COLLEGE OF CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $150k → 17%VANDERBUILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $1.5M → 14%J CRAIG VENTER INSTITUTE: $186k → 11%LA JOLLA INSTITUTE: $106k → 14%VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL: $1.2M → 14%LA JOLLA INSTITUTE: $108k → 11%VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $223k → 14%THE SCRIPPS INSTITUTE: $98k → 11%VANDERBUILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $155k → 14%THE SCRIPPS INSTITUTE: $65k → 11%VANDERBILT COORDINATING CENTE: $139k → 14%THE SCRIPPS INSTITUTE: $35k → 11%VANDERBUILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $120k → 14%J CRAIG VENTER INSTITUTE: $10k → 11%VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $65k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - SAN DIEGO: $231k → 11%VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $9k → 14%UNIV OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO: $201k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $140k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - SAN DIEGO: $75k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $59k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - SHERLOCK: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
NY
MA
PA
CA
CO
MO
MD
AZ
NM
TN

Grants abroad, by region: $117k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Region not stated$117k · 100% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: RESEARCH FUNDING

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.3M · 6 repeat orgs$3.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
15

Total granted

$6.3M
$3.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+3%

Still filing today

83%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $81k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
HealthEducationScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VU
    Vanderbilt University Medical Center
    4× · 2018–2022 · $3.7M · revenue +110%
  • LJ
    LA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY
    3× · 2018–2020 · $355k · revenue +45%
  • TS
    THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    3× · 2017–2020 · $198k · revenue +88%

Funded once

  • VU
    VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL
    one grant, 2017 · $1.2M
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBI
    one grant, 2017 · $365k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO
    one grant, 2019 · $300k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
4
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
5
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
6
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
7
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
8
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
9
Van Andel Research Institute

Medical research organization van andel research institute is an independent biomedical research organization committed to improving the health and enhancing the lives of current and future generations.

Health
10
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
11
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
12
The Jackson Laboratory

The purposes of the laboratory are scientific, medical, charitable, and educational. our mission is to discover precise genomic solutions for disease and empower the biomedical community.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology; the most unlike its peers is University of Colorado Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Vanderbilt University Medical Center: $3,726,600 · HealthVanderbilt University Medical CenterTHE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $198,204 · HealthTHE WISTAR INSTITUTE OF ANATOMY AND BIOLOGY: $150,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $148,977 · Health+2 more: $209,440 · HealthVANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL: $1,240,415 · OtherVANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICALREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $509,904 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIAUNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBI: $365,167 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBILA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY: $355,093 · OtherLA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGYUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $300,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCOUNIV OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO: $200,795 · OtherUNIV OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGOWeill Medical College of Cornell Univers: $150,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $150,000 · OtherVANDERBILT COORDINATING CENTE: $139,170 · Other+3 more: $248,117 · Other+3 moreJ CRAIG VENTER INSTITUTE: $1,379,880 · Science & TechJ CRAIG VENTER …Massachusetts Institute of Technology: $150,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $150,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $150,000 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $150,000 · EducationTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $150,000 · Education
Health$4,433,221Other$3,658,661Science & Tech$1,379,880Education$750,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center: $3,726,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJ CRAIG VENTER INSTITUTE: $1,379,880 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetLA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY: $355,093 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $198,204 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WISTAR INSTITUTE OF ANATOMY AND BIOLOGY: $150,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $148,977 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $145,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetACCESS TO ADVANCED HEALTH INSTITUTE: $63,640 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Emory UniversityAmerican Cancer Socie…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Emory UniversityGA13.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Emory University · American Cancer Society Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Human Immunome Project Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Human Immunome Project Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Human Immunome Project Inc?

Find your warmest path to Human Immunome Project Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Human Immunome Project’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home